Text 25152, 44 rader
Skriven 2012-02-07 18:09:03 av Lee Lofaso (2:203/2)
  Kommentar till text 25071 av Roger Nelson (1:3828/7)
Ärende: News
============
Hello Roger,

 RN> If I keep getting wmaill like this, I may go back to reading Ann Coulter.
 RN> (-:

 RN> http://www.naturalnews.com/034848_Microsoft_Merck_eugenics.html

Aside from the obvious typo, who is to say that eugenics is bad?
We (the entire world) condemned Hitler and the Nazis for what they
did to the Jews (and others).  However, we did much the same thing
to blacks, women, intellectually challenged, and other minorities.
We gave them lobotomies, placed them in mental institutions, forced
them to be sterilized or be given vasectomies, and to suffer many
other indignities and injustices.  I say "we" not only to mean the
USA, but the world as a whole.

Yes, we thought we could make a better world by eliminating the
less fortunate from this earth.  Or at least put an end to their
capability of reproducing.

Another word for eugenics is "selective breeding".
We do it all the time, in our modern societies, using
gene-splicing and other hith-tech means to eliminate the
unwanted from our society.  Not only that, but we also
continue to use low-tech means, setting ourselves apart
in different "classes" so as not to associate with those
lesser than ourselves.  Rich white folks tend to associate
with other rich white folks while poor black folks remain
forced to associate with other poor black folks.  That sort
of thing.  In that way, multiculturalism can never be, as
that would be the death of us all.

We condemned Hitler and the Nazis because we chose to demonize
him and his kind.  And yet we did the same exact thing.  As such,
how can we call ourselves the "good guys" when we are (or were)
no different from the "bad guys"?

Even the Pope (who served in Hitler's army) agrees with me,
knowing Hitler was never excommunicated.

--Lee

--- MesNews/1.06.00.00-gb
 * Origin: news://felten.yi.org (2:203/2)