Text 30821, 63 rader
Skriven 2012-07-06 12:47:02 av mark lewis (1:3634/12.0)
  Kommentar till text 30818 av Roy Witt (1:387/22)
Ärende: Link requto  to the Z1C-echo
====================================
 ml> [QUOTE]

 JK>> AND... it could be that Vlist didn't understand WTF his mailer was
 JK>> telling him. I mean what "NO CARRIER" means if he even sees that in
 JK>> his logs.

 RW> WTF does she mean by 'his mailer' ?

any mailer... irex was not specifically mentioned and i never understood her to
be specifying irex without saying irex...

 RW> Since when does IREX, his mailer, make POTS calls?

he and many others who run irex also run at least one other mailer...
specifically for POTS... irex doesn't make POTS and never did... this is/was
not in question and was never contemplated or assumed on my part... 

 JK>>    Over here it can mean differenent things depending on
 JK>> which log you are looking at.... like all the nodes are busy. Don't
 JK>> forget he's was using abandonware.. Internet REX. outchey <spelling>

 ml> [/QUOTE]

 ml> no, SHOW US where she says that you used IREX to try to contact Bin
 ml> Li?

 RW> What part of 'his mailer' went over your head?

his POTS mailer is/was dbridge, IIRC... irex didn't come into play in the
earlier statement... it does come into play now in the abandonware statement...
neither implies or assumes the other, though... not to me... not now and not
then when i started this branch of discussion...

 ml> FACT: it isn't there!

 RW> But mailer is. She knew that Vlist uses Irex and cont'd with a
 RW> mention of IREX.

she also knows that he uses/used something else for POTS...

 ml> FACT: she didn't write it!

 RW> That's odd... what are those initials JK>>> all about?

to be very clear and pedantic: she never wrote that he used IREX to try to make
a POTS call... period...

 MvdV>> She is just trying to discredit me by misrepresenting what
 MvdV>> happened.

 ml> you are doing that all on your own...

 RW> She's doing that to herself as well. And you're doing it to
 RW> yourself by calling it make-believe...

i'm not calling anything make-believe... i'm pointing out exactly what was
stated and mis-read/mis-understood... obviously mvdv is not the only one who
cannot read what is written and understand it without making assumptions not in
evidence :/

)\/(ark

 * Origin:  (1:3634/12)