Text 6632, 79 rader
Skriven 2010-04-05 22:44:03 av Roy Witt (1:387/22)
   Kommentar till text 6601 av Joe Delahaye (105439.fidonews)
Ärende: Question about democracy
================================
04 Apr 10 20:41, Joe Delahaye wrote to Roy Witt:

 JD>   Re: Question about democracy
 JD>   By: Roy Witt to Joe Delahaye on Sun Apr 04 2010 15:06:25

 >> I guess tomorow's (Monday) report on it is beyond your comprehension
 >> today.

 JD> Since tomorrow's reports has not yet come out, it would certainly be
 JD> beyond my comprehension <G>

I would bet on that. Monday's report was released late on Sunday, FYI...

 >>  JD> Your favourite news channel <G>, probably did not carry it
 >>  JD> because it made things look bad, but a lot of other stations DID
 >>  JD> indee carry that item
 >>
 >> On the contrary, Joe. Fox news has no problem with covering the story
 >> and leaving the hype out of it. When CNN reports, they add more
 >> bullshit to make you sit up and notice. Which is why Ward's version is
 >> always the fucked up version.
 >>

 JD> That of course is your opinion.

For those who're not liberally minded, that's not only an opinion, that is
fact.

 JD> Mine is opposite, and I was not just talking about CNN.  I believe I
 JD> stated I saw it on multiple channels, on the news?

"Multiple" meaning: CNN, MSNBC, ABC, etc.. Of course these are all
liberally minded entities.

 >> FYI: Note that the citizen's patrol doesn't do the arresting. Note
 >> also that carrying long guns is frowned upon by the Border Patrol...

 JD> Doesnt mean that they dont do a citizen's arrest or worse/

Anything worse would be vigilantism, which is illegal in the US. The
Border Patrol would arrest those citizens for that.

 JD> Worse being shooting at them so they will (hopefully) turn around.

They're warned not to shoot at anyone, because that would be vigilantism.
Not to mention that many Mexicans will shoot back.

 JD> I'm sure that some would love to 'accidently' hit some of the
 JD> illegals.

Finding an illegal who is commiting a felony crime would make that self
defense, not an accidental shooting.

 JD> Just to bring home a point of course.

So far, there is no point to your diatribe about something you have no
idea of what it's all about.

                R\%/itt

PS - All along the US/Mexican border there is gun violence on a daily
basis, but not by any American citizens, save perhaps for those who may
be involved in running Mexican drugs north of the border.

The Mexican drug cartels have waged a war against their own government and
any private citizen who opens his mouth against them and their drug
runners. Shooting deaths in Mexican towns and cities close to their side
of border occur on a daily basis. No American citizen would stand a chance
against the cartel's automatic firearms that they use. Americans aren't
allowed to possess automatic firearms, thus they'd be out-gunned even with
a high powered and scoped rifle (which they're not allowed to carry on
border patrols, btw) Being a military man, you should know what it would
be like to fight automatic weapons fire with a handgun. If you don't,
shame on you.


    You can put lipstick on a pig, but the pig still stinks!
--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000-10
 * Origin: SATX Alamo Area Net * South * Texas, USA * (1:387/22)