Text 8079, 72 rader
Skriven 2010-06-04 20:51:55 av Michiel van der Vlist (2:280/5555)
   Kommentar till text 8070 av Roy Witt (1:387/22)
Ärende: Joram van der Sloot. Again..
====================================
Hello Roy,

On Friday June 04 2010 10:10, you wrote to me:

 MvdV>> I see. So it is not for what they say, but for their name that
 MvdV>> you ridicule them. I will keep that debating trick in mind for
 MvdV>> the next time some FEDERAL this or that makes a statement...

 RW> The difference being that nothing FEDERAL has anything to do with
 RW> ROYALTY, which seems to fly over your head.

The similarity is that carrying "Federal"in a name is just as laughable as
"Royal".

 MvdV>> Has is not occurred to you that this may be just a little bit
 MvdV>> too obvious? A girl found dead in a hotel room that was hired
 MvdV>> by someone who was prominently in the news for the
 MvdV>> disappearance of another girl, but who could not be convicted
 MvdV>> for lack of evidence? How convenient.

 RW> Betcha he'll be convicted this time. The evidence wasn't covered up by
 RW> an inept investigator this time.

What evidence? Where is the murder weapon with his finger prints on it?

Your are avoiding the question. Has it not occeured to you that this is just a
little but too obvious?

 MvdV>> What's a respectable girl doing in Joram van der Sloot's hotel
 MvdV>> room anyway?

 RW> Ummmm, her apartment is a hotel room? What was dipshit doing in her
 RW> apartment?

She was found dead in his hotel room. What was she doing there to begin with?

 RW>>> I knew that SOB was as guilty of murdering Natalee as he is of
 RW>>> the poor gal in Peru...

 MvdV>> You also knew there were WMD's in Iraq...

 RW> Not any more, they were shipped to Canada.

They were not found. Even Bush' own investigators admitted to that.

 RW>>> Stuck in South  America, he won't get off this time.

 MvdV>> We will see. But even if he gets convicted, that is not proof
 MvdV>> he was responsible for the death of Natalee Holloway.

 RW> I guess you haven't heard that van der Slut offered to tell the mother
 RW> where Natalees' body is, for $250,000...

It was all over the news here. So?

 RW>(FBI reported that occured on May 10, 2010) That's called distortion
 RW>and is also a crime.

Distortion? Distortion of what? And since when is it a crime to offer
information for sale?

 RW> It seems like your boy is in deep shit.

He is not "my boy" and yes, he is in deep shit. But even in Peru suspects are
assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. So we will see how this
works out.


Cheers, Michiel

--- GoldED+/W32-MINGW 1.1.5-b20070503
 * Origin: http://www.vlist.org (2:280/5555)