Text 14132, 110 rader
Skriven 2014-04-06 14:46:00 av TIM RICHARDSON (1:123/140)
     Kommentar till en text av ROY WITT
Ärende: Re: Ann Richards LOL!
=============================
On 04-05-14, BILL MCGARRITY said to ROY WITT:

-=> Roy Witt wrote to Bill McGarrity <=-

RW> @MSGID: <5340B55B.6388.2fidonews@tequilamockingbirdonline.net>
RW> Greetings fat boy!

RW> (liberal pigs)

TR>> The first was Anne Richards!

BM> Oh? All I understood was that Mrs. Richards was a good governor for
BM> the state.

RW> You're not very well informated and that has already been demonstrated.
RW> There must be a problem with your home page, wiki...

RW> In 1976, Richards ran against and defeated a three-term incumbent on
RW> the four-member Travis County, Texas Commissioners' Court. Of course
RW> during this time, her marriage ended, in part because of the strain of
RW> politics on the relationship. Richards' drinking became more
RW> pronounced, and she sought treatment for alcoholism in 1980.

RW> At the 1984 Democratic National Convention, Richards delivered one of
RW> the nominating speeches for nominee Walter Mondale (big time loser),
RW> and she campaigned very actively for the Mondale/Ferraro ticket in
RW> Texas, can you say LOSER?

RW> In 1990, Texas' Republican governor, Bill Clements, decided not to run
RW> for re-election to a third nonconsecutive term. Richards painted
RW> herself as a sensible progressive (she proved not to be), and won the
RW> Democratic gubernatorial nomination. Richards narrowly won on November
RW> 6, 1990 by a margin of 49-47 percent (Libertarian Jeff Daiell drew 3.3%
RW> in an effort that included TV spots and considerable personal
RW> campaigning).

RW> As a self confessed faggot, you will love this next one.

RW> In 1993, Richards signed into law the re-codified Texas Penal Code
RW> which included Section 21.06, the state's "Homosexual Conduct" law
RW> which states:

RW> "(a) A person commits an offense if he engages in deviate sexual
RW> intercourse with another individual of the same sex. (b) An offense
RW> under this section is a Class C misdemeanor."

RW> In 1990, Richards had campaigned in Houston to repeal the law. But, as
RW> governor, her signature criminalized same-sex sexual relations in
RW> Texas.

RW> Your typical liberal in action...

RW> In 1994 after only one term, she was defeated by George W. Bush, having
RW> polled 46% of the vote to Bush's 53% (Libertarian Keary Ehlers drew the
RW> remainder), despite spending 23% more than the Bush campaign. LOL!

RW> The Richards campaign had hoped for a misstep from the relatively
RW> inexperienced Republican candidate, but none appeared, and Richards
RW> created one of her own in calling Bush "some jerk." Also typical
RW> liberal mannerisms.

RW> And in retrospect, all liberal losers gather together to support each
RW> other, although usually in vain.

RW> She was a tireless campaigner for Democratic candidates throughout the
RW> United States. In the 2004 presidential election, Richards endorsed
RW> Howard Dean (another loser) for the Democratic nomination, and
RW> campaigned on his behalf. Richards later stumped for Democratic nominee
RW> John Kerry,(another loser) highlighting the issues of health care and
RW> women's rights. Some political pundits mentioned her as a potential
RW> running mate to Kerry; luckily, she did not make his list of top
RW> finalists, and he selected North Carolina Senator John Edwards (another
RW> loser, now serving time in a federal prison)...

RW> You are now dismissed until the next historical lesson is presented,
RW> fat boy.


BM>Damn Roy... your entire arguement is copied almost word for word from
BM>wikipedia...

BM>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ann_Richards

BM>Go get a life Roy... you're about as useless as tits on a bull and I was
BM>going to say the only things that come from texas are steers and queers...
BM>but I don't want to insult the gays by putting you in the their league.

BM>Adios there my friend.... and make sure you do a better job of at least
BM>trying to hide wilipedia's information...


You know what piss's them off really? Not that counter information is `out
there' disputing their distorted points of view.


What really piss's them off is someone would go out there, GET the counter
information, and then USE it to dispute their notions!


THATS the real problem with the Bill McGarrity's of the world! They can't
STAND it when their info is deflated!






---
*Durango b301 #PE* 
 * Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 Join Us: www.DocsPlace.org (1:123/140)