Text 14696, 129 rader
Skriven 2014-04-28 16:26:00 av TIM RICHARDSON (1:123/140)
     Kommentar till en text av BILL MCGARRITY
Ärende: Re: Gosnell
===================
On 04-27-14, BILL MCGARRITY said to TIM RICHARDSON:


BM>My point was to expose you and your rhetoric.


TR> The only thing you've been able to `expose' is your own ass! Your pants
TR> fell down again!


BM>Oh, because you didn't include he was also a republican and I called you
BM>out on it is my fault?  Being you knew he was both, why didn't you say
BM>that to begin with?  That's the basis of your pomposity when you deal with
BM>issues.  You leave out very important parts to fit your needs. Again,


TR> This is a hoot!


BM>A hoot? Seems like I've painted a very specific picture of you Tim.  If
BM>some other reader didn't happen to know who we were talking about they
BM>would have walked away thinking the killer was just a democrat.  My point
BM>was by exposing your lack of full disclosure it will give the average
BM>reader a better picture on what was being discussed, rather than a one
BM>sided political rant.  No matter what he was, we can both agree he's a
BM>discusting murderous animal.



By the way...the `only' thing you've really managed to `expose' here is your
own ass.


You have been all over the board here, trying to make a meal out of a
`nothing' sandwich, for about three or four packet cycles, now.


Your buddy brought up `deaths in traffic accidents' by what he called
`contributors' and you used that to start your course down the `distraction
trail' by expanding on that one yourself.


You THEN tried to inject `racism' onto conservatives, and when I answered that
one with a few `factual' revelations on who the `racists' REALLY were...you
took it further afield trying to gin up a `gotcha', which immediately fell
flat on its face.


THEN....when I mentioned that this latest shooter was not only KKK, but ALSO
tried to get elected under the *democrat* banner first...you continued your
attempt at leading the original discussion down the garden path by trying to
cobble together anOTHer `nothing sandwich' out of the fact that I did not
*specifically* state that the SECOND time he attempted to run for office, it
was as a *republican*!


Well...in case it flew right over your head....my POINT was; *he made his
first attempt as a democrat*! He was un-successful only because, over the
years, the democrats had changed their tune (NOT because they were any less
racist...but because they knew they HAD to swap sides on the issue or never
get elected again!), and he apparently didn't get the memo!


You've deliberately wandered far afield in your effort to gin up a `gotcha' on
me over the least little tidbit you THINK you can use as an indictment....


But the two main subjects of the discussion remain unchanged; the `choice' the
left wrested from Roe v Wade, has so far cost the lives of 50-and-counting! A
`Gosnell' clinic was almost inevitable, and their are probably more out there
we haven't uncovered yet.


And so-called `global warming'...which quickly morphed into `climate change'
when the champions of that boondoggle realized the game was up, wqas the OTHER
subject you were falling on your face over. That, by the way..has taken an
even bigger hit for the worst in the latest report to the UN on `climate
change'.


The lead author of that report himself says it was heavily altered for
`political' reasons having nothing whatever to do with `science'!


In fact...it was so heavily altered that one professor who worked on it
refused to sign it.


There was some sort of `contact group' meeting at which there were exactly
*two* scientists present....and 45 or 50 `government officials' of various
sorts.


He (the lead author) also states that more than three quarters of the original
document comprising the report had been altered!


And also according to him, those government officials made it clear that any
language IN the report that were considered inconsistent with THEIR interests
and `multi-lateral negotiations' (in other words...what THEY decided among
themselves was real and wasn't real, for the purposes of imposing taxation...
creating `government grant money' pretexts for..etc etc) was unacceptable!


Like....`don't rock the boat, Jack'! We like our little comfortable way of
making an income plus retirement packages and perks at the expense of the un-
enlightened! Leave it alone!


And again...this so-called `scientific' report has NOTHING whatever to do with
`science'...only perpetuating the `climate panic' in order to cheat the
taxpayers of various countries out of money to keep the `gravy train' of
`grants'...and endless `studies' at public expense.


Over nothing!


So....your little `nothing sandwiches' took you nowhere. You tried to get the
band to play the `gotcha' jig....and *you* were the only one dancing. Without
music at that.





---
*Durango b301 #PE* 
 * Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 bbs.docsnetservices.com (1:123/140)