Text 14995, 71 rader
Skriven 2014-05-07 21:41:33 av Joe Delahaye (41494.fidonews)
  Kommentar till text 14983 av Roy Witt (1:387/22)
Ärende: Right up your, errrr,
=============================
  Re: Right up your, errrr,
  By: Roy Witt to Joe Delahaye on Wed May 07 2014 17:17:21


 RW> Oh, you referred to Fox as a fake news agency. Odd that it is the most
 RW> watched news source, isn't it. There must be something to that fake shit
 RW> that everybody prefers over the likes of the lib-lies perpetrated by news
 RW> channels, such as MSNBC, CBS, CNN, NBC, ABC, etc..

Yes I did.  News controlled and severely biased to the right, controlled by
Murdoch and company


 JD>> they are too damn biased in their opinions.

 RW> ROTFLMAO! Fox News doesn't report opinion, they report the news as it
 RW> happens(ed) and you decide how you'll take it in your own stride.

Of course it does.  I have never seen a pure news show on either Fox or CNN or
even on the three Canadian news channels.  It is running commentary 24/7 unless
there is a live event in which case that is covered 24/7


 RW> What you've been watching isn't news, it's one person's show (O'Reilly,
 RW> Hannity, etc.) and their opinion (although what they have to say is right
 RW> on the money. Fox just gives them an orange crate to speak from. The one I
 RW> like best among those people is Greta Van something. She brings in people
 RW> who're well equipped to comment on the subjects she has in her
 RW> 'investigations' of the most notorious fanatics on the left.

Both of those two you mention up above, have been shown the error of their
ways, by their guests more then once.  I hate commentators and interviewers,
(the bearded wonder on CNN included), who ask a question and then almost
immediately interrupt with either another question, or in the case of those two
above to call the person they are interviewing a liar.


 JD>> as well as that program on CNN where they pit an idea against a
 JD>> panel of opposite politcal views.  Most of the time that is quiet
 JD>> from what have seen of it but they do get carried away.

 RW> Not only that, but they can't stop reporting on it until something new
 RW> comes along. Talk about Boring!

I think you have the wrong show here.  I cant think of the show, but it was
gone for several years from CNN and just came back this or last year.  It
features people from both political parties, on a panel, with two hosts, also
from opposite sides.  

 RW> I did notice something good about CNN, they have less commercials than
 RW> Fox ... I guess if you don't have an audience, there's no sense in
 RW> advertising anything on it. I would hope that Fox would take notice of
 RW> that and do the same, but I guess when you're the top dog, you do what you
 RW> have to do. That alone probably pays each and every one of those very
 RW> beautiful blondes well enough to keep them coming. I've never seen an ugly
 RW> bitch like Rachael Maddow on Fox either.

I find an excessive amount of advertising on all networks, CNN included.  As
for top dog, who told you that fox was in that position? As I mentioned
elsewhere, polls can be made to give any result you wish to have, especially if
you pay for it.


 RW> That's because there are different views on every subject, no matter
 RW> what the subject is. At least most of us can agree that libs are the
 RW> executioners in anything political, attacking the conservatives until
 RW> they draw blood. I'm really surprised that conservatives have been so
 RW> docile in the face of that shit. But, they're of a different breed than
 RW> the mongrel dogs on the left.
--- SBBSecho 2.27-Win32
 * Origin: The Lions Den BBS, Trenton, On, CDN (1:249/303)