Text 15295, 93 rader
Skriven 2014-05-16 07:18:00 av TIM RICHARDSON (1:123/140)
     Kommentar till en text av JOE DELAHAYE
Ärende: Re: Voting (new voting sy
=================================
On 05-15-14, JOE DELAHAYE said to TIM RICHARDSON:

JD>Re: Re: Voting (new voting sy
JD>By: TIM RICHARDSON to BILL MCGARRITY on Thu May 15 2014 15:46:00

TR> Problem is...you picked up the wrong weapon this time. You know little of
TR> the bible, even less about the teachings of both God, and His son Jesus,
TR> and either un-knowingly or deliberately, mis-interpret what the bible
TR> teaches on the subjects of both sodomy AND beastiality.



JD>I'll give you another problem.  The bible, is a book of parables.


I'll give you a couple more `problems'.


Firstly...there is a good possibility that the part of the bible known as the
`Pentateuch' (the first five books)...*supposedly* written mostly by Moses and
a few others...is actually much, much older than that, and was `adopted' by
the early `Hebrews' (supposedly `God's chosen people')!


And secondly...at a gathering ordered by Constantine in a place called Nicaea,
the foundations were laid for the Catholic church. Much of its dogma and so-
called `traditions' were probably dictated by Constantine himself. Much of the
mystique of the Christian religion was born at this, and some following
gatherings there.

JD>That
JD>includes both the old and new testaments.  It is interpeted differently by
JD>different Christian religions.  Just look at the various versions.  King
JD>James protestant version, the Catholic version, etc, etc.  The bible belt
JD>Christians seem to believe the bible verbatim.  It was never intended to
JD>be that way.  You should compare it to your own constitution.  It was
JD>written to reflect what was happening THEN.  That no longer h olds true
JD>for a lot of things in that constitution.  Tbat is why it is now
JD>interpeted differently then when it was written.


Yeah...well people like McGarrity sometimes get the notion they're talking to
a god-fearing, bible-believing, bible-verse-spouting down-home believer when
they're dealing with me.


McGarrity tried to pull the `switcheroo' on me and started trying to pound me
with a bible!


McGarrity knows little about the subject matter he's trying to use against me,
and he certainly ain't a Christian.


JD>The same hold true with the different versions of the bible.


There are several versions of the bible. My wife had several versions. The one
she carried to and from church was older than she was, and she had it in a
cloth print cover. Her sister asked me for it when she died, and I gave it to
her without ever taking the cloth cover off and seeing what `version; it was.


Another one she kept with her all the time was a `new age' version of the
bible which I have in my book case still.


There are many `versions' of the bible, just as there are many `versions' of
Christianity.


The Catholics teach that they and they alone are the `true' church, and there
isn't any other church.


JD>BTW, the Beast you mentioned in one of  your paragraphs, like was the
JD>Devil.


JD>Remember the sign of the Beaset.


The `only' time I even came close to mentioning a `beast' was in reference to
`beastiality' ...which refers to humans having sexual relations with animals.






---
*Durango b301 #PE* 
 * Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 bbs.docsnetservices.com (1:123/140)