Text 16101, 115 rader
Skriven 2014-06-12 10:36:00 av TIM RICHARDSON (1:123/140)
     Kommentar till en text av JOE DELAHAYE
Ärende: Re: Right up your, errrr,
=================================
On 06-11-14, JOE DELAHAYE said to TIM RICHARDSON:

JD>Re: Re: Right up your, errrr,
JD>By: TIM RICHARDSON to WARD DOSSCHE on Wed Jun 11 2014 10:11:00


TR> Its a little more complicated than that....but, that discovery
TR> puts a whole new face on this `global warming' scare tactic
TR> perpetrated by those who have been using the taxpayers of the
TR> world as `cash-cows' they regularly milk for funds to further
TR> their own financial well-being.


JD>What can be more complicated then the fact that the whole earth is a giant
JD>volcano.  You can deny it all you want, but climate change is a fact, and
JD>man DOES have something to do with it.  It is of course not all from man
JD>made things


TR> Can you say `gigantic, on-going fraud'?


JD>No.


Well....I consider you to be the more sensible of the three, between you,
McGarrity, and Ward.....so I'll address you on this topic.


First of all...I don't just pull this information out of thin air, I go
out and FIND it. Its available to anyone who cares to look at this whole
`global warming' notion with a skeptic's eye. And when whole governments
are getting on the band wagon with policies and rules that both hurt tax
payers, AND cost them money needlessly, EVERYbody should be skeptical!


When any nation's leadership institutes policies that are repressive, costly,
and without the real scientific basis that has been claimed for many decades
now, people should certainly get real skeptical.


But...lets look at a few things;


The present leadership in this country has foot-dragged and instituted rules
that have cost both the US AND Canada money, not to mention jobs. I refer to
the oil pipeline that would have brought Canadian tar sand oil to the US.


The project would create thousands of new jobs in a time when several million
American workers have left the work force entirely because of the economic
policies of an out of control know-nothing, who was `Affirmative-Actioned'
into the U.S. presidency, and his low-information mob of screaming dwarfs
who have born him into office upon their shoulders twice in a row.


Not to mention go a long way toward making America more energy-independent,
and help lower the prices of heating fuel, gasoline, and electricity.


Is so-called *green energy* the wave of the future? Probably so. But the
technology of it does not now exist. Witness the heavy investment of tax
payer dollars in the so-called *green energy* industry, represented by
several outfits like Solyndra (or whatever the hell it was), starting up
with much ballyhoo, who then very quickly went bankrupt all within the
first few years of the Obama administration! (I bet if someone with the
resources and contacts made an in-depth investigation into just how
much money people like Al Gore had initially invested in some of the outfits
that failed, who then pulled out with a huge profit BEFORE the outfit went
down the tubes with a huge chunk of taxpayer money along with it, it would be
a real eye-opener!)


And...here's a few of the things I've found:


Back in March of this year, the IPCC (that is the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change) issued its most recent report.


And....guess what?


This report (as most all its past reports have done) comes up with dire,
apocalyptic threats of terrible things happening unless `mankind' (make
that read: the taxpayers of the world) does not give the UN the power to
tax and regulate fossil fuels, and subsidize and mandate the use of
`alternative' fuels (make that read: *green energy*).


So...lets see....we (the whole world) turn the power to regulate and tax
how we heat our homes, fuel our vehicles, and produce our electricity,
over to an organization that has far outlived its meaning OR usefulness,
and everything will be all rosy and happy once again!


But...much of what the IPCC is predicting will happen unless we all fall
into line with the UN's attempted power grab, was all happening back in
what has become known as `the little Ice Age'! Flooding was far worse then
than in the 20th century. Probably dikes and levees have contributed more
to modern-day flooding than so-called `climate change'.


There are reports by accredited, peer-reviewed scientists (insofar as any
of the media and warming alarmists allow contrary studies and findings
to be published) which strongly counter this `global warming' scare. In
fact, expose most of it as the nonsense it is.


The information is out there.


---
*Durango b301 #PE* 
 * Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 bbs.docsnetservices.com (1:123/140)