Text 16121, 130 rader
Skriven 2014-06-15 03:29:00 av TIM RICHARDSON (1:123/140)
     Kommentar till en text av JOE DELAHAYE
Ärende: Re: Right up your, errrr,
=================================
On 06-12-14, JOE DELAHAYE said to TIM RICHARDSON:

JD>Re: Re: Right up your, errrr,
JD>By: TIM RICHARDSON to JOE DELAHAYE on Thu Jun 12 2014 10:36:00

TR> Well....I consider you to be the more sensible of the three, between you,
TR> McGarrity, and Ward.....so I'll address you on this topic.


TR> First of all...I don't just pull this information out of thin air, I go
TR> out and FIND it. Its available to anyone who cares to look at this whole
TR> `global warming' notion with a skeptic's eye. And when whole governments
TR> are getting on the band wagon with policies and rules that both hurt tax
TR> payers, AND cost them money needlessly, EVERYbody should be skeptical!


JD>Cut.....................


JD>I'll grant you that you can find that information.  I'll also say that you
JD>can find information to support any point of view y ou might have.


Please note the following:


Professor Freeman Dyson...professor of physics at the Institute for Advanced
Study, Princeton University, and one of the world's most eminent physicists
said (and I'm quoting) "...the models used to justify global warming alarmism
are full of "fudge factors", and do not begin to describe the real world".


Dyson further stated that:


"I have studied the climate models and I know what they can do. they do a
good job of describing the fluid motions of the atmosphere and oceans. They
do a very poor job of describing the clouds, the dust, the chemistry, and
the biology of fields and farms and forests. They do not begin to describe
the real world that we live in."



Dr. Zbigniew Jaworowski, chairman of the Scientific Counsil of the Central
Laboratory for Radialogical Protection in Warsaw, and a former chairman of
the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation,
who is a world-renown expert on the use of ancient ice cores for climate
research, said..."The UN based its global-warming hypothesis on arbitrary
assumptions, and it is now clear these assumptions are false."


Professor Hendrik Tennekes, director of research at the Royal Netherlands
Meteorological Institute said: "...there exists no sound theoretical
framework for climate predictability studies used for global warming
forecasts."


Dr. Richard Tol, principle researcher at the Institute for Environmental
Studies at Vrije Universitiet, and Adjunct Professor at the Center for
Integrated Study of the Human Dimensions of Global Warming at Carnegie
University, said the IPCC's Fourth Assessment Report "...is preposterous,
alarmist and incompetent".


Dr. Antonio Zichichi, emeritis professor of physics at the University of
Bologna, and former president of the European Physical Society, who is
also one of the world's leading physicists, said that "...global warming
models are incoherent and invalid."


Many of the scientists I cite here make the same observation I have in
the past: computer `models' can be tweaked to reconstruct climate models
from the past...but only reflect how good the `programers' are to get
the results they desire in relation to `future' climate predictions!


JD>For
JD>Global Warming, no problem, the info is there.  Against it, the info is
JD>there.


The big difference is...the alarmists want to control whole economies,
the rest of us just want life to go on normally.


We've got our own oil supplies here on the North American Continent, why
allow ourselves to be held hostage by a bunch of rag-headed religious
fanatics, who thinks its cool to hold up a severed human head for an
international news camera?


We've got enough coal to run power plants for the next 300 years. And we
also have the techonology to burn it cleanly and efficiently. Why do
we let know-nothing politicians and community organizers `legislate' us
out of it? In the 300 years it'll take us to use all the coal supplies,
some scientific discovery will come along that will supply power to
the entire world, cheaply, and probably almost endlessly. What makes us
want to `immortalize' ourselves by being *the ones who stopped allowing
the use of fossil fuels*?  You and I...and everybody who participates
in this echo... will be dead and gone when they finally harness the
technology of the Sun's method of producing energy, and doing it in a
way that is almost inexaustible! So...why allow the `few' to make it
hard on the `many' just so they can control us? That doesn't make any
sense.


Here's two things to give critical thought to:


Fuel for cooking, heating and privately-owned-vehicle fuel, at reasonable
costs. is readily available to all of us on this continent (North America).


Only politicians, academics with an agenda, and out of control government
agencies with no accountability to anyone, who make up rules as they go,
are standing in the way of it and ordinary citizens who just want to live
their lives.


Now....ask yourself why it is they are so anxious to dis-arm private
citizens?






---
*Durango b301 #PE* 
 * Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 bbs.docsnetservices.com (1:123/140)