Text 16259, 132 rader
Skriven 2014-06-20 13:50:38 av Roy Witt (1:387/22)
  Kommentar till text 16220 av TIM RICHARDSON (1:123/140)
Ärende: Known Faggot.
=====================
Greetings TIM!

 BM>> Fuck you Tim and your useless bullshit you're constantly posting.

 TR> The translation of that is:

 TR> Neither he nor anyone else can put up a credible argument as to
 TR> the reality of the `global warming' scam, so they just scoff,
 TR> insult, belittle and curse.

Or they don't have the ability to comprehend the English langauge as it
was/is written.  Joe Delahaye, Bjorn Felten and Michiel Vlist for sure.

 RW>> So, now the shoe is put on the other foot and the troll slinks off
 RW>> into the darkness, under the bridge.

 BM>>  Do you not understand you and Roy are the laughing stock

 TR> As more and more credible evidence surfaces that the `global warming'
 TR> scam was just that, a scam, the louder the denial, curses, false
 TR> accusations, and scoffing will get.

Exactly. As McJerkey so very well demonstrated.

 TR> (Incidently....have you seen the news? There are snow storms going
 TR> on this month! In JUNE...and the month is over half over! And
 TR> they're getting SNOW fall!)

Yes, and I haven't seen that since my first trip to California, where
there was snow on the ground in New Mexico.

 TR> For someone who claims to `hit the (N)ext key rather than read my
 TR> posts...he sure post `to' me and `about' my postings an awful lot!

He's probably set up a msg scanner that is set on his name, your name or
mine. When it rings a bell, he's Pavlov'd into reading it...

 TR> But...obviously I'm irking him. So...I'll keep looking for and
 TR> sharing any and all information contrary to the `global warming' scam
 TR> I can.

Good idea...

 TR> I like pissing know-it-all people off by throwing facts in their
 TR> face!

You can't keep on doing that, since they're bound to learn from it. Well,
all but McJerkey are nearly smart enough to learn something.

 TR> The same with the sodomite crowd.

Ah yes. The McJerkey family.

 TR> A couple of things on that:

 TR> I see Pelosi sent some Catholic Bishop a letter `warning' him not to
 TR> take part in the `traditional marriage between a man and a woman'
 TR> march scheduled for the coming days.

LOL! I saw that too and chalked it up to 'stupid woman'...

 TR> You know....Pelosi is also Catholic. The letter the Bishop sent in
 TR> reply was far too soft for my liking. He made several good points
 TR> in his reply, but....

 TR> Had I been the one replying to her, I would have pointed out that,
 TR> she was a `Catholic' first and foremost. She either followed the
 TR> teachings of Mother Church, or she wasn't a good Catholic.

Excommunicate the bitch!

 TR> Mother Church teaches that the Holy Sacrament of Marriage was a
 TR> joining of a Man and a Woman in the bond of holy Matrimony for
 TR> the purposes of sanctifying their love in the eyes of God and
 TR> the Church, and the production of children from the bonds of that
 TR> Holy Sacrament.

Good gawd man! Does this mean that Pelozi has/had children?

 TR> Further...Mother Church also teaches that any physical union between
 TR> individuals of the same sex is the practice of sodomy.

Yeup.

 TR> Sodomy, in thought, word OR deed, is a mortal sin, condemned by God
 TR> Himself in His Holy Word, and punishable by condemnation to Hell.

Yes.

 TR> Even privately or publically supporting the thought, word or act of
 TR> sodomy, is a mortal sin. And those who engage in such cannot safely
 TR> partake of the Sacrament of Holy Communion, without endangering their
 TR> immortal soul.

Bill.

 TR> In fact...those who publicly verbalize support for acts of sodomy,
 TR> who claim to be members of the Holy Catholic Church, stand in danger
 TR> of ex-communication from Mother Church, and all its Sacraments.

Yeup.

 TR> And....had she come out in public support of same-sex marriage one
 TR> more time after recieving my reply letter...I would PUBLICLY
 TR> begin ex-communication proceedings against her.


 TR> By the way....the bible, no matter WHICH version you want to use,
 TR> condemns the act of sodomy as an abomination, an un-natural
 TR> bastardization of the physical act of love between a Man and a
 TR> Woman.


 TR> Wasn't it `Bill McGarrity' who was recently boasting that `he only
 TR> went by the Bible'?

Well, he only went by certain parts of the Bible, none of which had
anything to do with supporting sodomy. You know, taken out of context, the
bible could be interpretted to mean a lot more, or less, than it does.

 TR> Talk about `feet of clay'.

Yes, we're slowly getting down to the last of humanity.


    Have a day!

         R\%/itt - K5RXT

--- GoldED+/W32 1.1.5-31012
--- D'Bridge 3.99
 * Origin: Felten's BS Lunch Counter, Special; BS w/Stuffing! (1:387/22)