Text 16389, 160 rader
Skriven 2014-06-24 13:16:53 av Roy Witt (1:387/22)
  Kommentar till text 16367 av Bill McGarrity (8664.2fidonews)
Ärende: (BIG YAWN!)
===================
Greetings Bill!

 BM>>> And does it not say Love thy neighbor?

 RW>>> It does, but it doesn't mean in a homosexual way. It merely means
 RW>>> that you should "love your neighbor as you would love yourself: But
 RW>>> now you also put off all these; anger, wrath, malice, blasphemy"
 RW>>> etc..

 RW>>> You havn't, so I'm guessing by your actions that you're still
 RW>>> sodomizing your brothers.

 BM>> Oh, you're a theologian now defining what loving thy neighbot is?

 RW>> I'm far from it, although I'll admit to having studied the bible
 RW>> many

 BM> About the only true statement you've made in a long time.

Everything I've ever said is true. You justhave a problem in English
comprehension that surpasses Joe Delaheye's comprehension.

 RW>> years ago and still quite able to read it in review. It provides a
 RW>> lot of entertainment when morons who 'quote from it' do so out of
 RW>> context; which is what you've been doing all along.

 BM> Where did I quote anything out of context.  I quoted a passage from
 BM> the exact same book of Leviticus you did.

When you take a complete paragraph and break out a one-liner from it, you
have taken words out of context.

i.e. Leviticus 18:17-"You shall not hate your fellow countryman in your
heart; you may surely reprove your neighbor, but shall not incur sin
because of him. 18-You shall not take vengeance, nor bear any grudge
against the sons of your people, but you shall love your neighbor as
yourself; I am the LORD."

 BM> Now the question is, why shouldn't I say your taking things out of
 BM> context?

Because you can't.

 BM> BTW, morons is not a personal attack?  You're a very strange man.

Do you consider moron in the plural to encompass just you...

 BM>> You wear many hats Roy..

 RW>> It's a bitch having so many hats, but somebody has to wear them in
 RW>> the face of those who misquote from the bible.

 BM> Again, show me where I misquoted that passage from Leviticus?

See above...

 BM>>> Oh wait, that's your selective comprehension again...

 RW>>> Actually, you're the one being selective. "Love they neighbor"
 RW>>> doesn't mean you should fuck them in the ass or such his dick.

 BM>> Never said that.

 RW>> You didn't have to, it was very well defined by your depicting a
 RW>> bible scholar stating out of context that which does not apply to
 RW>> 'love the sodomites' that you wanted it to mean.

 BM> Again, your reasoning is guided by your inherent blindness when it
 BM> comes to another human being.

You forgot to include 'ignorant' between another and human...

 BM> No one has ordained you as judge and jury when it comes to the Bible
 BM> just as no one has ordained me.

Actually, I was, but that's water over the bridge here.

 BM>   I'll let God do the judging when their time comes.

If there is such a being; I'm sure you won't have anything to say about
it that would make a hill of beans. I said I've studied the bible, not
that I believe any of it.

 BM> How about you worry about you own issues and leave the lives and
 BM> choices of others to them.

If they'd leave me alone, I don't have a problem with that. However, when
it comes down to you attacking me or anyone else, that's my que to engage.

 BM>>   My statements were based where I wasn't a homophobe over their
 BM>> actions.

 RW>> LOL! You're dismissed.

 BM>>> The rest of your drival is rehashed BS....

 RW>>>                  ^^^^^^
 RW>>> When you're caught up in your own misinterpreted drivel (note
 RW>>> proper spelling) that doesn't mean Tim is wrong, just that you're
 RW>>> not paying attention.

 BM>> Hey... spelling nazi.... is that all you got?

 RW>> Did I call it a misspelling? No. I merely used your tact to point
 RW>> out the obvious. Which means that your label of spelling Nazi (note
 RW>> cap on the noun) is rediculouse.

 BM> Didn't have to, it was implied by your statement "(note proper
 BM> spelling)".

Oh, but there is a difference. You're just not able to see it yet.

 BM> BTW, there's no "e" in the word rediculous. May want to make note of
 BM> that if your trying to make a point of correcting someone else's
 BM> spelling mistake.

Misspelings are sometimes deliberately done so to make people laugh or get
their attention. And in doing so, I succeeded in getting your attention
to every detail. That increases your reading English comprehension. From
now on, you'll be more careful in your spelling of words that seem to go
over your head; as in wittless.

 BM>> You do make me laugh..

 RW>> It's good that you can laugh at yourself.

 BM> No Roy, you are still the laughing stock of this echo along with your
 BM> buddy.

If you havn't noticed by now, no one is laughing as hard as Tim and my
self at your flailing of arms in defense of your personal attacks on us.

 BM> You're consistantly screaming at the top of your lungs about
 BM> something you have no control over and that is ripping you apart.

If you were a psychiatrist, you'd be an utter failure.

 BM> There called inalienable rights for a reason Roy...

They're...

 BM>  and they're off limits to the likes of you and your bigoted, racist,
 BM> idiot, wannabes followers.

c
You may say so until you're blue in the face, but you haven't convinced me
yet.

 BM> Have whatever you want... you're paying for it.

Oh, ok. Today is lunch on you...


    Have a day!

         R\%/itt - K5RXT

--- GoldED+/W32 1.1.5-31012
--- D'Bridge 3.99
 * Origin: Felten's BS Lunch Counter, Special; BS w/Stuffing! (1:387/22)