Text 16567, 156 rader
Skriven 2014-07-03 12:15:00 av TIM RICHARDSON (1:123/140)
     Kommentar till en text av JOE DELAHAYE
Ärende: Re: Right up your, errrr,
=================================
On 07-03-14, JOE DELAHAYE said to TIM RICHARDSON:

JD>Re: Re: Right up your, errrr,
JD>By: TIM RICHARDSON to JOE DELAHAYE on Wed Jul 02 2014 11:16:00

JD>>What truth?


TR> That `global warming' is about the biggest con job to come down the
TR> pike since snake oil!

JD>Only in your, and other conspiracy believers minds.


TR>> Major hint: NASA is a U.S. government agency. All employees of
TR>> NASA are paid by the U.S. government (make that read the
TR>> taxpayers). They have jobs, salaries, retirements and benefits
TR>> to protect. So....what do you suppose they'll find?

JD>These days, NASA is mainly a general contractor.  Yes, I have seen their
JD>scientists come to unpopular conclusions.


TR> Are you saying that they won't make a finding that preserves their
TR> jobs, salaries, retirements and benefits? Are you serious?


JD>Very


So am I. And so are millions upon millions of people who weren't
taken in by the pathetic explanation given about the use of the
word *trick* in the East Anglia e-mails that let the `global
warming' scam out of the bag.


Just as a favor to you....let me quote a few of them:


Here is Kevin Trenberth to Michael Mann:


"The fact is we can't account for the lack of warming at the
moment and it is a travesty that we can't. Our observing
system is inadequate." That was in an email exchange with
Michael Mann of the `hockey stick' graph.


He is deploring the fact that the Earth (by THEIR methods) hadn't
shown any `warming' in almost 15 years at that time.


Here's another:


This is from Jones to Mann. It seems that skeptics of the `global
warming' notion had gotten wind of something not quite right
with the CRU (Climate Research Unit) at East Anglia, and had
filed a (UK style) freedom of information request to view some
of the data. Jones seems determined they aren't going to see it:


"Can you delete any emails you had with Keith re AR4? Keith will
do likewise."


I have to tell you something right here. For the last 35 years I
have been an amateur astronomer. When I first got interested in
Astronomy, I found there were several facets of the discipline
that came with the territory (so to speak). A study of higher
mathematics and physics are almost mandatory, depending on
just how deeply you want to go into it. I wanted to know as
much as I possibly could learn, which meant that I would be
delving into subjects I soon wished I'd paid more attention
to during my school years.


In any case, my self-imposed study program took me into the works
of many past and present scientists, physicists, astronomers,
astrophysics (my main interest) mathematicians of all sorts.


Along the way, I also picked up a great deal of the `feel' of
real science and its strict methods of experiment, study, more
study...


I delved into Special and General Relativity enough to learn
some real strange things about nature, motion, and the
vastness of it all.


For instance....I learned that Isaac Newton was slightly off
with his laws of motion. Einstein made the slight correction
with his General Relativity in the early part of the 20th
century.


Most recently, it has been shown that Einstein himself was
slightly `off' by a minute amount, when `gravitational
lensing was discovered and used to push the age and size
of the Universe into a proportion never before known.


And in all that study and all those years I've NEVER come
across real scientists who have want each other to `delete'
or alter any of their work in order to *hide* a result or
line of experiment or investigation, from the world. EVER!


NOR...in the many years I've spent doing `all-nighters' at
one of my telescopes (I've had several, and still have two
6-inchers I use a lot) I have NEVER seen any scientists
use the word *trick* to describe how they arrive at results.


These emails and the activities they describe and\or suggest,
cannot be `spun' into anything other than exactly what they
are; a massive fraud perpetrated by so-called `scientists',
and the only motive possible is to perpetuate their own
financial well-being (tenure, salaries, retirements,
benefits, monetary grants, research funds, etc etc).


There's no getting around it. They are fighting strongly
the publishing of any and all opposing information to their
supposed `findings', belittling any and all who try to
publish any counter information, threatening and brow-
beating any credible publication that attempts to present
a paper that opposes `global warming' ...


Real scientists do not engage in that sort of thing.


That alone is proof positive that, where there's all that
smoke...there's some fire in there somewhere.


`Global warming' has been exposed as a massive fraud, costing
billions if not trillions of dollars, both in the past and
into the future. Its purpose is to defraud taxpayers, control
whole countries, and further the size and scope of big
governments worldwide. Scientists who take part in the scam,
as well as the main stream media who support the notion,
are nothing more than useful idiots, and those who
deliberately ignore the unmistakable evidence AGAINST `global
warming' are nothing mre than dupes!





---
*Durango b301 #PE* 
 * Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 bbs.docsnetservices.com (1:123/140)