Text 17259, 79 rader
Skriven 2014-07-29 10:40:00 av TIM RICHARDSON (1:123/140)
     Kommentar till en text av ROY WITT
Ärende: More shite...
=====================
On 07-28-14, ROY WITT said to JANIS KRACHT:


JK> "Fifteen out of twenty-nine sitting Republican governors deny climate
JK> science despite the overwhelming level of scientific consensus, the
JK> enormous cost to taxpayers, and the critical place governors occupy
JK> in implementing new limits on carbon pollution."


RW>That's nice, but irrelevent.


She's out in left field with that. It doesn't matter `what' a bunch of
governors think. They aren't in the White House or the U.S. Congress.


First of all...the only thing *overwhelming* in this whole thing is
the *overwhelming* amount of fraud being perpetrated on the people
of the nation.


Secondly...as I pointd out, this `consensus' of which everybod speaks,
is a completely made-up notion.


One of the *many* reasons I rarely trust a `poll' is the way its usually
conducted.


They want to `gin up' support for their candidate.


So...they take a `poll'.


They pick a neighborhood who's demographic is heavily, if not `solidly',
democrat.


They pick a 100 or so names from that neighborhood, call them on the
phone, and ask something like `....don't you think **** (democrat
candidate) will make a good choice?'


So...they get an overwhelming number of `hits' on democrats (out of 100
calls most if not all are democrats).


From that...they come out with their (totally expected) `overwhelming
majority of the city....blah blah blah...'!


This `97%' of scientists was a made-up number. Its hogwash.


And by the way...it doesn't matter what anyone *thinks*... the *truth*
is, they've been manipulating the temperatures to show the result they
want! That isn't the way `science' is done.


And these e-mails of the East Anglia CRU infamy? Along with refusing to
reveal data...show how `conclusions' were arrived at...refusing to
release their math or programing info in court cases...and the whole
conspiracy to `conceal' their material?


If `global warming' is so real....and Mankind in such dire danger...
why conceal anything? Why conspire to delete material they seem
to not want being made public?


What is it they are trying so hard to keep everybody from knowing?




---
*Durango b301 #PE* 
 * Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 bbs.docsnetservices.com (1:123/140)