Text 1790, 48 rader
Skriven 2012-08-02 10:08:42 av Torbjorn Mohn (2:211/37)
   Kommentar till text 1330 av Janis Kracht (1:261/38)
Ärende: daja vu (was: .fidonet)
===============================
>> I
>> explained that already, and there is no disagreement on this! What I want to
>>know, is how you managed to stop MY messages from being passed on to Kim (all
>>your Fidonet messages should be sent to BCG-Box?) and not all the other ones?
>> Where did you loose track on my explanation? Log on to BCG-Box and see for
>> yourself!!!
> I had no way to do that, Torbjorn.. no way at all.  If someone else was doing
> it, I couldn't tell you that either.

Well, you cannot blame me for thinking that, all indications point at your
system, you have even confirmed it yourself... What am I to think?

>>I explained all this in my previous massage. Kim HAS BEEN GETTING messages fr
>>you (1:261/38), EXCEPT those that passed through 2:203/2 on its way to YOU!!!
>> I fail to see how the ">" sign can do that?
> Got me.  All I can see is what comes in here and how.  I did see some of your
> messages, but probably not all of them.  That's why I thought you perhaps
> uploaded to more than one source.  It could be that someone else is playing
> games but I can't help you figure that out.

Well, it's all water under the bridge now anyway.... I guess whoever was
responsible for it will never admit it. I'm pretty sure thought that it has to
do with the NAB actions last year. And who was in the drivers seat for that?

>>> That is absolutely not true.  There is no agenda here.
>> Well... it's there, and it's not very well hidden?
>No, you may be trying to make one here, but there is none. It's real simple to
> me.  Kim couldn't send messages to this echo before I removed the flag as I
> said.  That's all I know about this situation.

Yes, I hear you.....

>>Give me a reason to change my mind again about you then. Right now it's hard
>> see that happen..... Sorry Janis.....
> Torbjorn, this is one of those things where you have to either believe me or
> not.  I can't convince you it seems.  I can show you my external.bbb and the
> file before I made the change (my editor makes a backup of the original
> file)... that's it... but if you are thinking like Michiel, you'll say
> something like a file like that can be modified :(

I don't need or want to see your config file. It will proove nothing anyway.
However thank you for turning your "polite side" on again in this
discussion.:-)

Torbjørn

--- BBBS/NT v4.10 Dada-1
 * Origin: Circle Of Protection (2:211/37)