Text 18331, 40 rader
Skriven 2014-09-15 15:17:59 av Michiel van der Vlist (2:280/5555)
     Kommentar till en text av Joe Delahaye (44671.fidonews)
Ärende: Dealing With Bullies
============================
Hello Joe,

On Sunday September 14 2014 10:54, you wrote to me:

 MV>> technical issues regarding echomail ARE covered. Nowhere do I see
 MV>> the word "technical". So where does the exception handling come
 MV>> from? I have read the whole document. Now what part that I have
 MV>> missed says technical echomail problems are covered despite the
 MV>> fact that there is no echomail policy?

 JD> Michiel, you cannot use the same paragraph for everything.  There are
 JD> enough examples in policy that you can quote, that would apply to this
 JD> situation.

Then please, please tell me where in P4 I can find it.

 JD>  Turning things around to suit an agenda is what you accuse
 JD> people in this zone of, so why are you doing it too?

I am not doing that. I am asking for clearification. Or playing devil's
advocate if you wish. They keep telling me I shoud read the whole document. I
have done that. Many, many times over. When I read "P4 covers echomail, you
tell me that is nullified by the section that follows, the section about an
echomail policy. You say there is no echomail policy and so P4 does not cover
echomail.

Now we have an echomal problem - excessive dupes - and now you claim that this
is an exception, it IS covered by P4 because it is a /technical/ echomail
problem. So I ask you again: "where in policy does it say that this
interpretation of yours that P4 does not cover echomail because there is no
echomail policy, does not apply to technical echomail problems? Where is this
exception documented?

I have read all of P4, I can not find it. So please tell me what I missed.


Cheers, Michiel

--- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20130111
 * Origin: http://www.vlist.org (2:280/5555)