Text 19321, 167 rader
Skriven 2014-11-13 11:45:00 av TIM RICHARDSON (1:123/140)
     Kommentar till en text av WARD DOSSCHE
Ärende: Re: True Nature of Man
==============================
On 11-13-14, WARD DOSSCHE said to TIM RICHARDSON:

TR> But....impossible to reconcile is the discrepency between the professed
TR> mere
TR> six thousand-year existence the Bible attributes to Mankind...and the
TR> several
TR> hundred-thousand year old fossilized relics and remains of Man's culture
TR> and existence found all over the world.


WD>Oh, it's easy.


WD>My Mormon friend Howard explained it to me.


WD>First he claims he can prove with genealogicol texts and documents that
WD>he's a direct descendant from Adam and Eve (as you probably know, the LDS
WD>church has the largest genealogocal database in the world).


Which is almost next to meaningless. Thats like the geneological traces for
those who's ancestry are of European or British descent. They will `get you'
back to England or France...and `find' your family's coat of arms...for a
fee. When I first heard of such `services' I also learned that `over 60% of
their traces turned up a family coat of arms'!


So I think to myself....the world's population wasn't anywhere near what it
is now back then...and there were just `so many' family's who were `noble'
such that they had a `coat of arms' anyway. So...these outfits have to be
flooding with non-existent nobility.


Even given that a family `name' might only have been attached to some noble
house for so long a period that they are tracable to that coat of arms, like
a family who were servants or men-at-arms of a certain noble house, that isn't
justification for claiming nobility.


Same with the Mormons. Most of them try to get themselves back to Joseph Smith
or Brigham Young, and claim ancestry to them. Its weird.


WD>So I asked him, since he could trace all that, how long it was ago. And he
WD>said "about 6000BC).


Yeah...well humans such as us have been inhabiting the Earth for several
`hundred' thousand years. Some of the more ancient structures and relics
around the world go back 20 thousand years or more.


WD>So when I asked him about procreation and Adam and Eve's sons fucking
WD>their daughters, or even their mom, to father chilcren with all due
WD>genetical consequences, he said it was a mistery created by God.


According to some ancient tale there was a war in heaven between Lucifer and
his followers, and God and the angels who stayed loyal to him. God won and
cast Lucifer and his group down to Earth where they married with human
women. And thats how the human race was able to go from Adam and Eve, to
`multiplying on the Earth. According to the bible `there were giants in those
days...men of renown'. `And the sons of God took the daughters of men to
wife'.


WD>When I asked him about fossilised dinosaur-bones predating 6000BC, he said
WD>that carbon-dating of fossils is a hoax and those dinosaur bones had been
WD>burried there by God to test the faith in us humans.


I went through that with a bunch of Christians once. Although when it first
began to be used it might have been a little `loose' in its results, due to
the technology being pretty new then, and a bit uncertain. But over time
it greatly improved in accuracy.


From `Christian-oriented' sites you get information that is quite un-
scientific. Carbon 14 is actually a radioactive form of carbon that
gets into plants from the atmosphere. It then gets into animals and humans
when they eat it (vegetables, etc).


When they die, they cease the carbon exchange with the environment, and the
carbon 14 left in them begins a radioactive decay. The amount of carbon 14
left in a bone fragment or piece of wood from a structure can be used to
determine its `approximate' age.


Carbon 14 dating has a limit of about 50 or 60 thousand years...well beyond
the `6000' years claimed by religionists.


WD>He actually believes all that ... then again he's a horse-rancher, he
WD>breeds horses so that certain traits are combined and passed-on to the
WD>next generation meaning he understands genetics. It's just that in humans
WD>it doesn't work.


Yeah...well, he's not much different than other religionists; close-minded,
twisted science, and bible-believing.


WD>When talking to him I feel a little bit like talking to you ... it's like
WD>addressing a total idiot with preconceived ideas who will reject anything
WD>if it doesn't fit in his plan.


You are upset that I go out and find hard information that walks all over
the `global warming' panic, and then dare to post it to counter the vast
mis-information put out by the warming alarmists, aren't you?


Unfortunately, you can't keep the discussion on an adult plane...you have to
insult and name-call.


Winter seems to be coming early this year. In parts of the country records
of 100 years standing have been broken.


Looks like there'll be a great ski season in the Alps this winter. All those
`balmy, snowless winters' predicted by the `alarmists' aren't happening.


Some Swiss online news site says this is gonna be a `damn cold winter'.


Places in Siberia were already covered with snow in October, which almost
always speaks for a harsh winter coming.


By the way...all those solar panels might not be much help if the winter
ends up being severe. No sun....no power....no heat....


And they're saying that winter in Merry Ol' England is gonna be a real
bitch this year!


Hope you aren't depending on just `solar' panels to keep you warm this
winter.


Looking at the OPI (October Pattern Index) all the bars for October show
negative readings.


On the `Eurasian Snow Cover Extent' map for October of this year it shows
little snow fall at the beginning of October...and on October 27th shows
a huge snow cover! Largest extent since 1976, they say.


You don't have to look at the data if you don't want to. Just keep your
head in the sand....I'll post reminders every now and then, don't worry.


Hey...Al Gore seems to have disappeared for now. He's laying mighty low.


Ta ta!


---
*Durango b301 #PE* 
 * Origin: Check Out Doc's QWK Mail  Via Web BBS > DocsPlace.org  (1:123/140)