Tillbaka till svenska Fidonet
English   Information   Debug  
ENET.SYSOP   33904
ENET.TALKS   0/32
ENGLISH_TUTOR   0/2000
EVOLUTION   0/1335
FDECHO   0/217
FDN_ANNOUNCE   0/7068
FIDONEWS   24128
FIDONEWS_OLD1   0/49742
FIDONEWS_OLD2   0/35949
FIDONEWS_OLD3   0/30874
FIDONEWS_OLD4   0/37224
FIDO_SYSOP   12852
FIDO_UTIL   0/180
FILEFIND   0/209
FILEGATE   0/212
FILM   0/18
FNEWS_PUBLISH   4408
FN_SYSOP   41679
FN_SYSOP_OLD1   71952
FTP_FIDO   0/2
FTSC_PUBLIC   0/13599
FUNNY   0/4886
GENEALOGY.EUR   0/71
GET_INFO   105
GOLDED   0/408
HAM   0/16070
HOLYSMOKE   0/6791
HOT_SITES   0/1
HTMLEDIT   0/71
HUB203   466
HUB_100   264
HUB_400   39
HUMOR   0/29
IC   0/2851
INTERNET   0/424
INTERUSER   0/3
IP_CONNECT   719
JAMNNTPD   0/233
JAMTLAND   0/47
KATTY_KORNER   0/41
LAN   0/16
LINUX-USER   0/19
LINUXHELP   0/1155
LINUX   0/22093
LINUX_BBS   0/957
mail   18.68
mail_fore_ok   249
MENSA   0/341
MODERATOR   0/102
MONTE   0/992
MOSCOW_OKLAHOMA   0/1245
MUFFIN   0/783
MUSIC   0/321
N203_STAT   926
N203_SYSCHAT   313
NET203   321
NET204   69
NET_DEV   0/10
NORD.ADMIN   0/101
NORD.CHAT   0/2572
NORD.FIDONET   189
NORD.HARDWARE   0/28
NORD.KULTUR   0/114
NORD.PROG   0/32
NORD.SOFTWARE   0/88
NORD.TEKNIK   0/58
NORD   0/453
OCCULT_CHAT   0/93
OS2BBS   0/787
OS2DOSBBS   0/580
OS2HW   0/42
OS2INET   0/37
OS2LAN   0/134
OS2PROG   0/36
OS2REXX   0/113
OS2USER-L   207
OS2   0/4786
OSDEBATE   0/18996
PASCAL   0/490
PERL   0/457
PHP   0/45
POINTS   0/405
POLITICS   0/29554
POL_INC   0/14731
PSION   103
R20_ADMIN   1121
R20_AMATORRADIO   0/2
R20_BEST_OF_FIDONET   13
R20_CHAT   0/893
R20_DEPP   0/3
R20_DEV   399
R20_ECHO2   1379
R20_ECHOPRES   0/35
R20_ESTAT   0/719
R20_FIDONETPROG...
...RAM.MYPOINT
  0/2
R20_FIDONETPROGRAM   0/22
R20_FIDONET   0/248
R20_FILEFIND   0/24
R20_FILEFOUND   0/22
R20_HIFI   0/3
R20_INFO2   3222
R20_INTERNET   0/12940
R20_INTRESSE   0/60
R20_INTR_KOM   0/99
R20_KANDIDAT.CHAT   42
R20_KANDIDAT   28
R20_KOM_DEV   112
R20_KONTROLL   0/13273
R20_KORSET   0/18
R20_LOKALTRAFIK   0/24
R20_MODERATOR   0/1852
R20_NC   76
R20_NET200   245
R20_NETWORK.OTH...
...ERNETS
  0/13
R20_OPERATIVSYS...
...TEM.LINUX
  0/44
R20_PROGRAMVAROR   0/1
R20_REC2NEC   534
R20_SFOSM   0/340
R20_SF   0/108
R20_SPRAK.ENGLISH   0/1
R20_SQUISH   107
R20_TEST   2
R20_WORST_OF_FIDONET   12
RAR   0/9
RA_MULTI   106
RA_UTIL   0/162
REGCON.EUR   0/2056
REGCON   0/13
SCIENCE   0/1206
SF   0/239
SHAREWARE_SUPPORT   0/5146
SHAREWRE   0/14
SIMPSONS   0/169
STATS_OLD1   0/2539.065
STATS_OLD2   0/2530
STATS_OLD3   0/2395.095
STATS_OLD4   0/1692.25
SURVIVOR   0/495
SYSOPS_CORNER   0/3
SYSOP   0/84
TAGLINES   0/112
TEAMOS2   0/4530
TECH   0/2617
TEST.444   0/105
TRAPDOOR   0/19
TREK   0/755
TUB   0/290
UFO   0/40
UNIX   0/1316
USA_EURLINK   0/102
USR_MODEMS   0/1
VATICAN   0/2740
VIETNAM_VETS   0/14
VIRUS   0/378
VIRUS_INFO   0/201
VISUAL_BASIC   0/473
WHITEHOUSE   0/5187
WIN2000   0/101
WIN32   0/30
WIN95   0/4288
WIN95_OLD1   0/70272
WINDOWS   0/1517
WWB_SYSOP   0/419
WWB_TECH   0/810
ZCC-PUBLIC   0/1
ZEC   4

 
4DOS   0/134
ABORTION   0/7
ALASKA_CHAT   0/506
ALLFIX_FILE   0/1313
ALLFIX_FILE_OLD1   0/7997
ALT_DOS   0/152
AMATEUR_RADIO   0/1039
AMIGASALE   0/14
AMIGA   0/331
AMIGA_INT   0/1
AMIGA_PROG   0/20
AMIGA_SYSOP   0/26
ANIME   0/15
ARGUS   0/924
ASCII_ART   0/340
ASIAN_LINK   0/651
ASTRONOMY   0/417
AUDIO   0/92
AUTOMOBILE_RACING   0/105
BABYLON5   0/17862
BAG   135
BATPOWER   0/361
BBBS.ENGLISH   0/382
BBSLAW   0/109
BBS_ADS   0/5290
BBS_INTERNET   0/507
BIBLE   0/3563
BINKD   0/1119
BINKLEY   0/215
BLUEWAVE   0/2173
CABLE_MODEMS   0/25
CBM   0/46
CDRECORD   0/66
CDROM   0/20
CLASSIC_COMPUTER   0/378
COMICS   0/15
CONSPRCY   0/899
COOKING   32960
COOKING_OLD1   0/24719
COOKING_OLD2   0/40862
COOKING_OLD3   0/37489
COOKING_OLD4   0/35496
COOKING_OLD5   9370
C_ECHO   0/189
C_PLUSPLUS   0/31
DIRTY_DOZEN   0/201
DOORGAMES   0/2061
DOS_INTERNET   0/196
duplikat   6002
ECHOLIST   0/18295
EC_SUPPORT   0/318
ELECTRONICS   0/359
ELEKTRONIK.GER   1534
ENET.LINGUISTIC   0/13
ENET.POLITICS   0/4
ENET.SOFT   0/11701
Möte FIDONEWS_OLD4, 37224 texter
 lista första sista föregående nästa
Text 20398, 210 rader
Skriven 2013-09-03 13:28:00 av Bill McGarrity (2568.2fidonews)
  Kommentar till text 10156 av Lee Lofaso (2:203/2)
Ärende: Re: USAian's strange take on their constitution
=======================================================
-=> Lee Lofaso wrote to Roy Witt <=-

Right now we're all splitting hairs here as to what the law once was, and what
the laws governing oaths of office are in today's world.  The "Original" US
Constitution only required the President to "support and defend" it.  In
today's world, under the United States Code, 2006 Edition, Supplement 5, Title
5 - GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION AND EMPLOYEES

.3331. Oath of office
  
An individual, except the President, elected or appointed to an office of honor
or profit in the civil service or uniformed services, shall take the following
oath: .I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the
Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic;
that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this
obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and
that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I
am about to enter. So help me God.. This section does not affect other oaths
required by law.
  
(Pub. L. 89.554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 424.)

So therefore for the past 47 years, everyone takes and oath to "support and
defend".  All this stuff going back and forth doesn't change the fact that the
original question whether Snowden and Manning took an oath to support and
defend is moot.  They both took it.  End of  story.

All the rest is people beating chests... 


 LL>> The President of the United States takes an oath to "protect and
 LL>> defend" the US Constitution. He is the only (elected or appointed)
 LL>> federal official to do so. All other federal officials (elected or
 LL>> appointed) merely take an oath to "uphold" the US Constitution.

 BF>> As far as my googling has ended me, the above is true.

 RW>Stupid is as stupid says, I always say.

 LL> When it comes to politics, as they say in Texas, Witt is all hat,
 LL> no cattle.

 LL>> The US Constitution contains one oath of office, and one oath of
 LL>> office only - an oath of office for the president.

 RW>It does? Section please.

 LL> Article II, Section I, Clause VII.

 RW>Here  is what the Constitution provides for by law.

 RW>3331 - Oath of office

 RW>US Code, Title 5, Part III, Subpart B, Chapter 33:

 LL> Not found in US Constitution.

 RW>This section does not affect other oaths required by law.

 LL> No section of US Code affects oaths (or other oaths) in the US
 LL> Constitution, as the US Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land.

 LL>> For all other (federal) government officials, INCLUDING MEMBERS OF
 LL>> CONGRESS, the only thing the US Constitution specifies is that they
 LL>> "shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation to support the Constitution."

 RW>Actually, the Congressional oath is prescribed by law:

 LL> Do you know what the Supreme Law of the Land is?  I just told you,
 LL> so you should know it by now.  Or do I have to repeat myself?

 RW>At the start of each new Congress, the entire House of
 RW>Representatives and one-third of the Senate are sworn into office.

 LL> Of course they are, as required by the US Constitution.  Your point
 LL> (if you have one)?

 LL> Here is what you seem to be missing -

 LL> The oath itself (aside from the oath of office for president) is not
 LL> specifically spelled out in the US Constitution.  The method for taking
 LL> such an oath is also not spelled out in the US Constitution.  But all
 LL> members are "bound by Oath or Affirmation to support the Constutiton."

 RW>Federal employees take the same oath of office as Congress, by
 RW>which they swear to support and defend the Constitution of the
 RW>United States of America.

 LL> Again, such oaths are not spelled out in the US Constitution.

 RW>But we regress.

 LL> You regress.  I am merely trying to bring you up to speed.
 LL> I did say trying.  Not that I would necessarily succeed.  ;)

 RW>You claimed that no one but the President swears to uphold
 RW>or defend the Constitution, which is a bald faced lie.

 LL> Nope.  The President does not swear or affirm to uphold or defend
 LL> the Constitution.  The President swears or affirms to defend the
 LL> Constitution.  Not to merely uphold the Constitution.  There is a
 LL> difference.

 LL> The Constitution mandates the President to do so.  The Constitution
 LL> makes no such mandate on anybody else.

 LL>> every individual take an oath of office?  Or should it be proclaimed
 LL>> en masse?  Hmmm.  The US Constitution does not say ...

 RW>Read it again, it actually spells out who will take the Oath of
 RW>office, which is defined by US Code.

 LL> The US Code is NOT the US Constitution.
 LL> The US Code is NOT the Supreme Law of the Land.

 LL> If you want members of Congress to take an oath of office to "defend"
 LL> the US Constitution, then pass an amendment to the US Constitution!

 BF>> But, alas, they only know what their mainstream media tells them in
 BF>> the "News Shows" they happen to prefer.

 LL>> If the Framers of the Constitution had intended for all federal
 LL>> officials to take the same oath of office, or a specific oath of
 LL>> office, that oath of office would have been included in the US
 LL>> Constitution.

 RW>Not necessarily; in 1789, the 1st United States Congress created a
 RW>fourteen-word oath to fulfill the constitutional requirement:

 RW>"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the
 RW>Constitution of the United States."

 LL> Why did the Congress do that?  Because the Framers of the
 LL> Constitution deliberately left out such an oath from being
 LL> included in the Consitution.  Why did the Congress choose
 LL> to pass a law, rather than pass and ratify an amendment to
 LL> the Constitution?  Because not all members of Congress thought
 LL> that taking an oath of office was a good idea.  Or maybe they
 LL> did, as long as they could write the oath themselves.

 LL> Notice the wording the Congress chose.  No mention of the word
 LL> "defend".  Members of Congress left it up to the president to
 LL> "preserve, protect and defend" the US Constitution, wanting
 LL> nothing to do with having that responsibility for themselves.

 RW>It also passed the Judiciary Act of 1789, which established an
 RW>additional oath taken by federal judges.

 LL> So what?  The Judiciary Act of 1789 is not part of the US Constitution.
 LL> The Framers of the Constitution were aware of the idea of having
 LL> federal judges, as well as justices of the US Supreme Court.  Had the
 LL> Framers wanted to include an oath of office, with specific wording,
 LL> they would have included it in the US Constitution.  But they didn't.
 LL> This was not an oversight, but a deliberate act.

 LL>> Likewise in reference to amendments, as none have been added dealing
 LL>> with the issue of oaths of office.

 RW>None are required, as the issue of who will take the Oath was
 RW>settled in 1789 and again in 1865...

 LL> You really do have a revisionist view of history ...

 BF>> And, after all, they have a presidential (GWB) decree that it's
 BF>> nothing but a piece of paper after all.

 LL>> Bill O'Reilly did *NOT* say that!  So it must *NOT* be true!

 RW>Neither did GW...

 LL> How do you know?  Were you there?

 LL>> Besides, the original document is not a piece of paper.  Even
 LL>> though Roy Witt might like to tell you otherwise.  ;)

 RW>Parchment is a type of paper...

 LL> Not really.

 BF>> Please Lee, keep on informing us aliens, and disregard any
 BF>> obstructive insults from a few brainwashed countrymen of yours.
 BF>> The rest of us out here in Fidonet are fairly aware of what may
 BF>> be true and what not.

 LL>> "I caught a fish T-H-I-S big!"  <holding arms wide apart>

 LL>> Now go ahead.  Top that.  If you can.  :)

 RW>I caught a lewseeana sucker...he has very large lips, just like a
 RW>high yeller nigger.

 LL> You been watchin' far too many episodes of "Duck Dynasty" and
 LL> "Swamp People."

 LL> --Lee

 LL> --- MesNews/1.06.00.00-gb
 LL>  * Origin: news://felten.yi.org (2:203/2)

Bill

Telnet: bbs.tequilamockingbirdonline.net
IRC: irc.tequilamockingbirdonline.net Ports: 6661-6670 SSL: +6697
Radio: radio.tequilamockingbirdonline.net:8010/live


... Look TWICE.... Save a life.  Motorcycles are EVERYWHERE!!
--- MultiMail/Win32 v0.49
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32
 * Origin: TequilaMockingbird Online - Toms River, NJ (1:266/404)