Text 20439, 102 rader
Skriven 2015-01-06 14:04:00 av TIM RICHARDSON (1:123/140)
     Kommentar till en text av BJÖRN FELTEN
Ärende: The crack-pot century
=============================
On 01-05-15, BJöRN FELTEN said to TIM RICHARDSON:


TR> It is a hoax. A big one. Perpetrated on the taxpayers of the world by
TR> politicians, pseudo-academics, and trumpeted by the mainstream media.


BF>The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure
BF>and the intelligent are full of doubt.


BF>-- Bertrand Russell



You sure picked the right one to `quote'; Those who trumpet the `global
warming' morphed into `climate change' morphed into `geo-engineering' to
`save the planet' sure are `cocksure'.


So `cocksure' they are claiming the so-called `science' as *settled*!


No room for doubt.... no questions allowed....no opposition or peer-review
tolerated; `settled' period! All skepticism denied!


Any and all who DARE to raise even the slightest doubt or objection to the
expenditure of public monies on such things, before some of the material
submitted to `prove' the global warming stance is studied in depth and
verified legitimately, are castigated, ridiculed, marginalized, and ignored.


In fact...if you study the `quote' you fling out there at me above, you will
realize that supposedly-intelligent people willy-nilly declaring the `science
is settled', while ignoring the quickly-accumulating evidence to the contrary
of what they claim is `settled', are exactly the individuals Russell was
refering to when he stated that.


There is far too much accumulating evidence against the `global warming'
claims to go into in one post.


Again...I'll just ask a couple of easy questions I have yet to recieve a
sensible reply to:


If `global warming' is so real....why the need to delete e-mails on the
subject?


By the way....any and all universities, government agencies, or entities who
recieve taxpayer money to engage in `research' or financially support persons
salaries and/or activities (travel, apparatus, computers, salaries, financial
subsidies of any sort), whatever material, communications, or research results
they generate, obtain, or conclude, is taxpayer property and is not subject to
being withheld from the bottom-line owner (the taxpayers) thereof.


Which means, deleting material that taxpayer money funded (e-mails, methods of
obtaining results, etc) is a crime.


So...why all the deception? What are they afraid of having become public?


If its all so legitimate....why all the ill-legitimate methods of concealment?


So far...neither you or anyone else has answered any of those perfectly
legitimate questions.


Instead...you've heaped insult after insult on me. Which raises yet another
legitimate question:


If its all so real....why is it you must ridicule me? Why do you not present
me with some `content' in place of `insults'?


Are you so unsure of your own position that you can't bring some content to
the discussion? Only insults and put-downs?


Inless and until you do....do you really not see that you only prove my
expressed doubt and objections to be legitimate?


Are you really so blinded by your side's `science is settled' claims that you
cannot answer a couple of easy questions?







---
*Durango b301 #PE* 
 * Origin: Check Out Doc's QWK Mail  Via Web BBS > DocsPlace.org  (1:123/140)