Text 20540, 95 rader
Skriven 2015-01-10 10:41:00 av TIM RICHARDSON (1:123/140)
     Kommentar till en text av WARD DOSSCHE
Ärende: Re: The crack-pot century
=================================
On 01-09-15, WARD DOSSCHE said to TIM RICHARDSON:


TR>Worldwide poverty could have been erradicated by the money that went
TR>into the war in Iraq.


TR> Or by the vast sums we've been bilked out of by the `global warming' scam
TR> artists.


WD>If you wish to complain about that, write a letter to your congressman.


That hasn't done any good since long before I was born. The only way
politicians are connected in any way to their constituency is the ballot
box.


But by the time an election comes along a lot of damage can be done. And thats
a big reason why the taxpayers have been bilked out of so much money. It takes
less than two or three days of Congress to put stuff together, get majority
votes on it and send it to a president like Hussein who signs it into law.


And it takes years to get bad laws turned around or demolished. Obamacare is a
good example. It will take many years to repair the damage Hussein and his
cronies have done to the healthcare system here.


And `global warming' laws are some of the many bad laws it will take years to
change, all the money wasted on that idiocy will be non-recoverable, and
people will have been put to hardship energy-wise all for nothing!


Its a scam. And a lot of money has been wasted on it.


You know...you people continue to throw nothing but `why don't you write your
congressman'...or out and out insults at me. But the few simple questions I've
posed...nobody seems to have the answers to.


I'll ask again:


If `global warming' is so real....why the strong effort to suppress anyone who
is opposed to the notion?


If `global warming' is `man-made' as claimed, why the necessity to alter data?


If its so real...wouldn't it stand on its own without anyone having to
threaten opposition with damage to their careers? If its so real..why suppress
any papers in scientific publications that go contrary to it? Why tell each
other to delete any and all e-mails on the subject?


If it was real....there'd be no need for suppression of any opposite views.
There'd be real and regular discussion of it by both those who believe in it
and those who oppose it, without all the rancor...the insults...


Al Gore...one of its biggest proponents...won't even answer questions about
it, just stands up there and makes his wild-ass claims...ignores any and all
questions on the subject...then walks off the stage. And the few times he has
been in a situation he can't just `walk out' to avoid answering...he gets all
wound up, gets red in the face with pseudo anger, and starts spouting old,
already-debunked information...or goes off on a subject that has nothing to do
with what he was asked.


Of course...Gore has made millions off the scam, been given a meaningless
Nobel Prize, and been debunked so badly he has to go hide periodically to
avoid public embarassment. By the way...the very thing Gore blames the rest
of us for; having too big a `carbon footprint'...he himself plants all over
the place whenever he jets around the world in his private jet, not to mention
the electricity and natural gas he burns at his various homes and private
retreats.


So...if its so real....how come all you guys in here can do is try to shut the
subject down? Why not just answer a few simple questions on it? If its so real
you should have un-assailable evidence to back your position up. No need to
insult me or smart off at me over it. Your `proof' alone would be enough.


Many of you have insisted its real....that I'm all wet in my disbelief. Yet
you can't answer a few simple questions on the matter. Interesting.


---
*Durango b301 #PE* 
 * Origin: Check Out Doc's QWK Mail  Via Web BBS > DocsPlace.org  (1:123/140)