Text 20988, 87 rader
Skriven 2015-02-04 01:28:00 av TIM RICHARDSON (1:123/140)
     Kommentar till en text av DALE SHIPP
Ärende: Re: Assumptive questions
================================
On 02-03-15, DALE SHIPP said to TIM RICHARDSON:


-=> On 02-01-15  19:16,  Tim Richardson <=-
-=> spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Assumptive questions <=-


TR> Germany called for the references to the slowdown in warming to be
TR> deleted, saying looking at a time span of just 10 or 15 years was
TR> "misleading" and they should focus on decades or centuries.


DS>That sounds like a very reasonable position when one is talking about
DS>climate and not weather.


TR> Belgium objected to using 1998 as a starting year for statistics, as
TR> it was exceptionally warm and makes the graph look flat - and suggested
TR> using 1999 or 2000 instead to give a more upward-pointing curve.


DS>Maybe they should have used 1940 or earlier?



NASA launched a satelite to measure the CO2 in the atmosphere and where it was
coming from.


Sometime around Christmas 2014 they released data from the satelite.


BIG SURPRISE!!!!!


They had assumed it would show CO2 increases emitted were from the Northern
Hemisphere, and be largely due to industrialization and coal burning.


But....it wasn't!!!!


They had created a `computer animation' to show CO2 coming from industrialized
nations and traveling around the globe, and thought the satelite would `prove'
their theory. It didn't!


In fact....it showed that the primary sources of CO2 are from below the
equator, and are from `tropical rain forests'! Their `animation' had it
all worked out....it was `Man's fault' with burning fossil fuels!


But but but....the satelite tore their little `animation' to shreds! It seems
the actual source of most of the emissions are from the rain forest areas
in the Southern Hemisphere! In fact...Europe, Indoa and the United States
hardly even register!


In other words....CO2 increases and decreases are natural phenomena, and have
nothing whatever to do with Man!


By the way....that `97% concensus' Hussein and his `echo chamber' have been
touting?


Well....here's a `consensus' they don't want anyone to know about:


Pretty well all climate scientists agree that `global warming' has stopped or
slowed down in recent years...according to two scientists with the Cato
Institute; Patrick Michaels and Chip Knappenberger.


"This is in direct opposition to the IPCC's contention that global warming is
accelerating, and supports arguments that the amount of warming that will
occur over the remainder of  the 21st century as a result of human fossil fuel
usage will be at the low endd of the IPCC projections, or even lower," they
said...and added "Low-end warming yields low-end impacts."





---
*Durango b301 #PE* 
 * Origin: Check Out Doc's QWK Mail  Via Web BBS > DocsPlace.org  (1:123/140)