Text 21522, 116 rader
Skriven 2015-03-13 16:16:25 av Lee Lofaso (2:203/2)
  Kommentar till text 21520 av mark lewis (1:3634/12.0)
Ärende: Meltdown
================
Hello Mark,

 ml>> but you certainly have misunderstood my statement(s)...

 LL>> "... i fully support your view."
 LL>> - Mark Lewis to Tim Richardson, 3-11-15

 LL>> No grey area in that quote.  None that I could find, anyway. And we
 LL>> all know where Tim Richardson stands on the subject of climate
 LL>> change.  :)

 ml> yes, i said that i fully support his view...

Yes, you did.  As I noted.  Several times.

 ml> that doesn't mean that i agree with it...

Yes, it does.  "... i fully support your view." leaves absolutely
no doubt about that.

 ml> it doesn't mean that i disagree with it...

The statement "... i fully support your view." does not
mean partially.  It means "fully".  If you do not understand
what a word means, use a dictionary.

 ml> on the other side of the coin, it also doesn't mean that i agree or
disagree
 ml> with others who have the opposite view...

Bullshit.  The word "fully" means "in full" - not "partial"
or "partially, or "with reservations" of any kind.

 ml> i fully support their viewpoint, too...

Your statement was very specific -

"... i fully support your view" - being in reference to
Tim Richardson's view and to nobody else's view.  Especially
given the fact that Tim was speaking for himself and not for
others, and that you addressed your messaage specifically
to Tim.

 ml>> more than once...

 LL>> Yes, Tim Richardson has stated his position many times, so as to
 LL>> leave no doubt in anybody's mind as to where he stands on this
 LL>> favorite subject of his.  And you have also left no doubt as to
 LL>> where you stand on this subject -

 ml> no...

There is no gray area in the statement "... i fully support your
view."

 ml> again you have misunderstood...

Not at all.

 ml> that someone supports the viewpoint of others does not mean that they
agree
 ml> or disagree with them...

You were very specific, stating "... i fully support your view."
being in reference to Tim Richardson's view.

 LL>> Then let there be no misunderstanding -

 LL>> "... i fully support your view."
 LL>> - Mark Lewis to Tim Richardson, 3-11-15

 LL>> - can only mean one thing:

 LL>> Mark Lewis fully supports Tim Richardson's view that
 LL>> climate change (global warming) is a scam.

 ml> right...

Then what the fuck are you arguing about?

 ml> i support his viewpoint, period. end of statement.

That is what I said.  And noted.  Several times.

 ml> that doesn't mean that i agree or disagree with it...

It means exactly what you wrote, asshole.

"... i fully support your view."

If you wanted it to mean something else, you should
have written something else.  But you didn't.  You wrote
what you did because that is what you wanted others (or
at least Tim Richardson) to believe - that you fully
support Tim Richardson's view.

 ml> it certainly doesn't mean that i have been conned as you were trying to
say
 ml> earlier, either...

The oil companies are trying to con as many people
as they can into believing that climate change/global
warming is non-issue, that man has done little to
impact the environment in which he lives.  By stating
that you fully support Tim's view, you are claiming
that you yourself are a climate change denier.

Does that mean you were conned by the oil companies
(or by Tim) to believe that nonsense?  Of course not.
But the alternative would mean calling yourself a
dunce.

--Lee

--- MesNews/1.08.05.00-gb
 * Origin: news://felten.yi.org (2:203/2)