Text 21660, 187 rader
Skriven 2015-03-17 14:20:00 av TIM RICHARDSON (1:123/140)
     Kommentar till en text av NICHOLAS BOEL
Ärende: Re: Global Warming Con
==============================
On 03-16-15, NICHOLAS BOEL said to TIM RICHARDSON:


TR> In any case....I've made my point.


NB>FINALLY. So does that mean you're done and you'll exit the echo gracefully
NB>now? Doubtful.


No...it doesn't.


In fact....here's a little tid bit to illustrate one of the things I've been
talking about.


Senator Jeff Sessions is on the Senate Environment and Public Works committee.


In the past week or so the committee was taking testimony from Gina McCarthy
from the Environmental Protection Agency.


Now...She is touted in her bio as `an environmental health and air quality
expert'.


She was there to ask for the EPA's budget to be increased about 6%.


And here is a short exchange between them


Sessions: "I mean, where does the money come from?


He then asked her to address statistics on droughts, hurricanes and other
weather events being cited as `climate change'.


Sessions: "I'm not inclined to increase your funding. So now you say we've got
a danger and a crisis out there...yet a scientist found that we've had fewer
droughts in recent years. Do you dispute that?"


McCarthy: "I don't know in what context a scientists is making statements like
that." (a `non-answer)


And she stone-walled her way through a whole bunch of questions.


On hurricanes?


McCarthy:"I cannot answer that question. Its a very complicated issue."


On temperature?


McCarthy:"I do not know what the temperature models actually are predicting
that you are refering to."


Sessions:"Is the temperature increasing less than models predict or more than
that?"


McCarthy:"I can't answer that."


Sessions' point....and one I've made in here and elsewhere several times.. is
that these so-called `experts' are pouring our money down a shithole, and even
some of THEM don't have answers!


In 2013 the EPA's appropriation was $8,344 MILLION! Thats 8 point 344 BILLION!


They like to put it in `millions'....that way the taxpayer doesn't see the *B*
word, and gets the impression it isn't costing much.


It gets better.....


She's asking for over $500 million dollars to be added to the EPA's budget,
and (like some of you in here) she can't even answer a few simple questions
on a subject she's *supposed* to know all about!


Sessions:"This is a stunning developement, that the head of the Environmental
Protection Agency - who should know more than anybody else in the world, who
is imposing hundreds of billions of dollars in cost to prevent this climate
temperature increase - doesn't know whether their projections are right or
wrong!"


You see the problem?


They're taking BILLIONS of our dollars for an agency that doesn't even know
whether what they're doing is the right thing or not!


And before you try to dance over the EPA's `only 8 point-something billion'
and Sessions coming up with `hundreds of billions'....what the EPA does and
imposes in regulation DOES in fact cost hundreds of billions of dollars.


The taxpayers are not just out what money of theirs the treasury pours down
the shithole called `EPA'...but lost jobs in many industries that are hurt
by EPA's iron-fisted control over them.


This is a good insight into how the U.S. government runs; they piss away
many billions of our tax dollars every year...and most of them don't know
what they're doing! They can't even answer a few simple questions on the
subject they throw our money away on!


Oh and by the way....here's a question for you I ran across recently:


`If the science is so `settled' and there's such massive `concensus'
on it...then why is so much money being spent `researching' it? If
this science is so `settled'...there's nothing more to research!' Right?


TR> Now...don't step off the edge of the Earth!


NB>Good to know you still believe the Earth is flat. Keep up the good work!


Oh I don't really (but...you already knew that).


But....at one time it was the `scientific concensus' that it was!


And it was `scientists' who professed it!


Other `scientific consensus' notions debunked:


Hollow Earth


Phlogiston


Heliocentric Astronomy


Astrology


`Rain Follows the Plow' theory


Aristotelian Physics


Luminiferous Aether


The Lunar Effect


Craniosacral Therapy


Crystal Healing


and on and on.......




---
*Durango b301 #PE* 
 * Origin: Check Out Doc's QWK Mail  Via Web BBS > DocsPlace.org  (1:123/140)