Text 23001, 134 rader
Skriven 2015-04-08 12:12:00 av TIM RICHARDSON (1:123/140)
     Kommentar till en text av LEE LOFASO
Ärende: Fidonet Membership
==========================
On 04-07-15, LEE LOFASO said to MARK LEWIS:



----------------------------------------------------------------------
Area: 90-FIDONEWS  Message Number: 4211  Date: 03-20-15
From: MARK LEWIS
To: TIM RICHARDSON
Subject: The Global Warming Scam
----------------------------------------------------------------------

\|||/
(o o)
/----ooO--(_)---------\
|         Please        |
|     don't feed the    |
|        TROLLs!!       |
\--------------Ooo----/
|  |  |
-- --
|| ||
ooO Ooo

* Origin:  (1:3634/12)



ml>> illegal activity can only be determined by a court of law...
ml>> fidonet is not such an entity... please keep up...


LL>> Illegal activity has already been defined and determined (written,
LL>> enforced, and interpreted) by the various branches of government.
LL>> And it will continue to be done so in the future.


ml> sure...


LL>You seem to have a problem with that.  Why?


ml> but certain folk's actions have not been deemed illegal by a court of
LL>law...


LL>Not everybody in the world is guilty of having committed such acts,
LL>much less having been tried and convicted.  Your point (if you have
LL>one)?



Here's an interesting situation....


A sodomite went to a bakery and wanted a wedding cake for a pair of
same-sex sodomites who were getting married.


But the baker was a professing Christian and refused to make a `wedding' cake
for what the baker knew was an act strictly forbidden by their Christian
beliefs.


Rather than just accept the refusal...the sodomites loudly publicized the
bakery's refusal, threatened court action...and sparked off a bunch of hate
mail, physical threats, and of course, the obligatory threat of closure and
an end to the business.


PAGE 2!


A `Christian' went to a bakery owned and operated by a sodomite, ordered a
cake decorated with the Biblical passages that clearly declare sodomy and its
adherents, a sin!


The sodomite baker refused to make such a cake!


Here's two things right out of the hat:


1. In other words....there ARE sodomites out there who own and operate
bakeries to which a same-sex sodomite couple can go for any `wedding'
cake they want.

2. The only reason the sodomite community does their `bake the cake or
lose the bakery to litigation' stunt with non-sodomite, Christian bakeries
is to poke the non-sodomite segment of society in the eye.


And a third thing would be to point out the difference between the two above
cases:


Almost immediately the Christian bakery atarted recieving hate mail, threats,
outrage from the media....etc etc.


In the case of the sodomite baker's refusal to produce the cake ordered?



.....crickets!


Christians pretty well leave sodomites alone and don't go after them, either
physically or in the courts.


Sodomites go after Christians every way possible....threats, law
suits...setting up situations where they can raise a hue and cry of
`discriminatiob' against some Christian, cost them huge sums of money, even
their business.


Big hint:


Islamics detest sodomites! They kill them when they get the opportunity, even
throwing them off the roofs of high buildings, as happened recently.


But.....where's the outrage? Where's the loud, sodomite-defending media on
that one?


.....crickets....

---
*Durango b301 #PE* 
 * Origin: Check Out Doc's QWK Mail  Via Web BBS > DocsPlace.org  (1:123/140)