Text 24556, 73 rader
Skriven 2015-05-16 11:43:21 av mark lewis (1:3634/12.0)
  Kommentar till text 24546 av Michiel van der Vlist (2:280/5555.1)
Ärende: The totally incompetent
===============================
 On Sat, 16 May 2015, Michiel van der Vlist wrote to mark lewis:

 MvdV>> So you are pulling a "Janis" on me....

 ml> absolutely not...

 MvdV> Absolutely yes.

you just don't get it...

 ml> there's a reason why folks send private netmail instead of posting 
 ml> publically...

 MvdV> The reasons are irrelevant. If these people do not want to have
 MvdV> their arguments or their identity made public, so be it. But then
 MvdV> you should not have used it against me in the public debate.

i didn't use it against you in a public debate... you seem to forget that i do
not debate...

 MvdV> There is no way I can verify any of it or even know what exactly
 MvdV> they said. There is no defence against it. For all I know, these
 MvdV> people do not exist and you just made it up.

the fact remains, though, that your previously posted words say something
different than you are trying to say now... sure i could go back and dig up
your posts but why? to rub your nose in them? there's no fun in that and, in
fact, there's no fun in the network any more... certainly no fun in arguing all
the time...

 MvdV> If these people do not want to enter the public debate, you
 MvdV> should not have mentioned them at all. Doing it anyway, is
 MvdV> "pulling a Janis" on me. 

you're funny...

 MvdV> BTW, may I remind you that in Janis' case, her informer turned ou
 MvdV> to have given her errouneous information?

 ml> "did"... past tense... what about now?

 MvdV> My original statement was:

 MV> It may be OK by your interpretation of policy, but over here, it was
 MV> never acceptable. A coordinator that can't find the time or the
 MV> motivation to check on his FTN stuff more often than once every few
 MV> weeks should step down and make room for someone who can. Period.

yes but that's not the post or part of the post where you pitted Z2 against Z1
with your statements...

 MvdV> There is no mention of any particular zone, region or net, other
 MvdV> than "here". My region has been cleaned up and I will continue to
 MvdV> keep it clean as long as I carry the hat.

that's a GoodThing<tm>...

 MvdV> If this has been turned into a Z1 against Z2 issue - as your
 MvdV> anonymous informers claim - than it must have been you doing it,
 MvdV> as it certainly wasn't me. 

 MvdV>> Contrary to you who directed your response at Z3 only.

 ml> i've never complained about Z3...

 MvdV> Typo: s/Z3/Z2/. But you knew that.

actually i didn't know... i suspected but it is not for me to put words in your
mouth...

)\/(ark

 * Origin:  (1:3634/12)