Text 25869, 75 rader
Skriven 2015-06-25 19:56:13 av David Drummond (3:640/305)
  Kommentar till text 25865 av Bill McGarrity (18057.2fidonews)
Ärende: That old Nazi thingy once again
=======================================
On 25/06/2015 7:32 AM, Bill McGarrity -> David Drummond wrote:

 DD>> And yet you find it incomprehensible that Michiel nor I have never been
 DD>> in the situation you put forth?

 BM> Yes. Reasoning... no where did I say the act started out as "rape".... you
 BM> assumed that.  Even in situations where partners previously had relations
there
 BM> is always that one time where a woman. in the case of a hetrosexual
liason,
 BM> could somewhere during that time think to herself and say NO.  Problem is,
she
 BM> may not be able to effectively convey her feelings.

And that is the siuation I have never found myself in - and it sounds as if
Michiel has the same lack.

 BM>> Your attempt at trivializig the fact over my sexual prowess must come
from a
 BM>> deep seeded envy you have when it comes to women.

 DD>> I am not impressed with "sexual prowess" - it just points to males'
 DD>> oppression of women.

 BM> Then why did you bring the subject up? Your words are as plain as day
above.  I
 BM> used prowess, you used performance.

I am trying to decide why a woman would change her mind mid-act.

 DD>>> I guess that's what happens with casual sex - if one tales time to get
 DD>>> to know the woman one can impress her with what a nice chap one is and
 DD>>> make her disinclined to find such fault.

 BM>> Guess you've only been with one woman then, which is both commendable and
 BM>> explains your above statement but if that is indeed the case, your
 BM>> position on the ongoing topic is moot as you've not had enough
interactive experience to
 BM>> pass judgement on the possibilities.

 DD>> While I have not "been" with a great number of women it has been more
 DD>> than one. None of these were on the first time I met them.

 BM> Good... but the "issue" I speak of may not occur during a "first time"
 BM> encounter.  Is that too hard to understand?

I have never experienced such a thing in a subsequent encounter.

 DD>> I guess that make your "multiple conquest" model a moot point with me.

 DD>> That I wave worked in the education industry for more than two decades
 DD>> constantly surrounded by young, and not so young adults suggests that I
 DD>> have a little experience with the females of the species. Indeed I have
 DD>> not bedded them all - but that is not my style.

 BM> I have educated many young teenagers and adults as well and no one is
asking if
 BM> you've bedded them.  I really don't care.

I was trying to point out that I have had much interaction with women over the
years.

 BM> The possibility of a "rape" being committed after initial consent occurs
more often that you realize, whether you
 BM> want to believe it or not...

Never with me. If you have, where does this difference come from?

-- 

Regards
David

--- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.
 * Origin: Here (3:640/305)