Text 25884, 91 rader
Skriven 2015-06-24 23:06:34 av mark lewis (1:3634/12.73)
  Kommentar till text 25854 av David Drummond (3:640/305)
Ärende: That old Nazi thingy once again
=======================================
25 Jun 15 05:19, you wrote to Bill McGarrity:

 DD> On 24/06/2015 10:43 PM, Bill McGarrity -> David Drummond wrote:

 DD>>> Maybe that is why Bill thinks that every male has participated in
 DD>>> "rape" - the womenfolk in his area are not that impressed with his
 DD>>> performance and changed their minds.

 BM>> Can you really be any more laughable?  I never said all males have
 BM>> participated in "rape".  Get your head out of your ass and start using
 BM>> it to understand my words.

 DD> And yet you find it incomprehensible that Michiel nor I have never been in
 DD> the situation you put forth?

hahahahaha... all things cosidered, that you and michiel and others didn't get
any in your youth is quite easy to see... hell, i had more than my share and i
didn't lose my cherry until i was 18 but i was also pretty educated in the arts
of seduction and the activities... hell, i'd ben reading books like "the happy
hooker" and the rest of that series since i was ~8 when i first started smoking
(anything)... why did it take 10 years? i was/am a choosy bastard... sure i
could have jumped all of the neighborhood girls that were out for any tom, dick
or harry, but i didn't... while it made them chase me even more, it also raised
me to a level above them and those that chose to bed them...

 BM>> Your attempt at trivializig the fact over my sexual prowess must come
 BM>> from a deep seeded envy you have when it comes to women.

 DD> I am not impressed with "sexual prowess" - it just points to males'
 DD> oppression of women.

bullshit... it just points to your own lack of prowess... i seriously laugh
outloud when i hear today's commercials about erectile disfunction...
especially the comment about "if you have an erection that lasts for more than
four hours you need to call your doctor"... i'm asking what's the problem with
that??? hell, that's just about the time that the 4th or 5th nut is coming
around... if you can't keep up with that then there's something seriously
wrong... and this isn't even taking in to account the simple fact of keeping
your mind in the game... sure, i can see if someone can't concentrate on the
activities at hand and losing their erection or (as a female) their lube and/or
interest... the mind plays an important part in sexual encounters... while
either one of you may be ""all up for it"" it only takes one to be distracted
from the activity to lead to failure...

casual sex? that's a bullshit argument... all sex is casual unless it is forced
and that's a completely different discussion than this one started out to be or
is now... the question is what is "forced sex"... the problem is stupid humans
trying to clarify what they think is forced sex and what is not... even worse
is how the females are treated... look at the ""sand countries"" and how they
stone rape victims instead of the rapers... like it is the females' fault...
and let's not even mention their prolific homosexuality where young boys are
used instead of defiling females... let's also not stop to look at those
females that are all up for the encounter and even pushing for it and then
suddenly at some point in the midst of the activities are backing out for some
reason... the "damage"" (as it were) has already been done... the penetration
has already happened... the action is ongoing and now you're gonna call foul??

 DD>>> I guess that's what happens with casual sex - if one tales time to
 DD>>> get to know the woman one can impress her with what a nice chap one
 DD>>> is and make her disinclined to find such fault.

 BM>> Guess you've only been with one woman then, which is both commendable
 BM>> and explains your above statement but if that is indeed the case, your
 BM>> position on the ongoing topic is moot as you've not had enough
 BM>> interactive experience to pass judgement on the possibilities.

 DD> While I have not "been" with a great number of women it has been more than
 DD> one. None of these were on the first time I met them.

yay! goodie goodie for you! that doesn't make you any master or any better than
anyone else... but you talk like it does... like you are better than anyone
else...

 DD> I guess that make your "multiple conquest" model a moot point with me.

actually, it is a sad point that you just don't fit the model... :shrug:

 DD> That I wave worked in the education industry for more than two decades
 DD> constantly surrounded by young, and not so young adults suggests that I
 DD> have a little experience with the females of the species. Indeed I have
not
 DD> bedded them all - but that is not my style.

yay... good for you... but could it possibly be that none are/were interested?
you held no path of advancement for them?z

)\/(ark

... Chat mode is DISABLED during Quantum Leap
---
 * Origin:  (1:3634/12.73)