Text 27526, 54 rader
Skriven 2015-09-03 09:29:02 av Michiel van der Vlist (2:280/5555)
     Kommentar till en text av Janis Kracht (1:261/38.0)
Ärende: Z1C
===========
Hello Janis,

On Tuesday September 01 2015 12:39, you wrote to me:

 >> Isn't that exactly what Matt says? The complaint was thrown out,
 >> exactly what Matt claims would happen to any complaint filed against
 >> Roy.

 JK> Roy was NOT a favorite of R10C Brenda Donovan.

Well.. she was awfully quick to kick him out of the nodelist when he was the
victim of a forest fire. No "he will be back" then...

 JK> As a matter of fact, she on occasion sent me Roy's "current" ip
 JK> address because he was known to switch now and then.

I don't see the link with how she handled the PC.

 JK>  Trust me when I tell you that Brenda examined the situation
 JK> carefully.

I never trust peple who say "trust me". ;-)

She certainly took her time. Bordering on violating P4 section 9.7... I will
give her the benefit of the doubt and go for the angle that taking her time was
for carefull considertion. The bottom line still is that despite the fact that
she did not like Roy, she ruled in his favour. Just as Matt said would happen.

It is moot though. In the end it did not matter what Brenda ruled. We might as
well have skipped that level if P4 did not mandate it. Her desicion would have
been appealed either way. Had it not been me, it would have been Roy that filed
the appeal and the issue would have landed on your desk anyway.

And _you_ didn't take all that long. You did not carefully consider. You called
it "ridiculous" right away. You didn't even bother to hide the fact that you
had a personal interest in the outcome. You said you had passworded out
unwelcome systems yourself. You made no secret of it that had the ruling been
in my favour, you'd consider that a restriction on the operation of your own
way of doing things. How can one expect a fair and unbiased ruling if the judge
has a personal interest in the outcome?

Roy knew in advance that he would get away with it. Just as Matt says.

 JK> And when the ZCC tossed out the complaint, her reasoning was validated
 JK> I believe.

We all know how that went with you waking comatose ZCs to vote without having a
clue what it was all about.


Cheers, Michiel

--- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20130111
 * Origin: Rheb genfu cnpvsvfg cvt fuvg chffl (2:280/5555)