Text 31885, 154 rader
Skriven 2016-03-17 00:50:20 av Lee Lofaso (2:203/2)
  Kommentar till text 31881 av Bill McGarrity (24074.2fidonews)
Ärende: What kind of nonsense is this?
======================================
Hello Bill,

[..]

 LL>> This is what Janis Kracht's monkey (Ross Cassell) had to say
 LL>> about Tim Richardson (and all others Ross disagrees with) -

 BF>> Can't you just ignore him, and let the rest of us make our own
 BF>> decisions?

 RC>> There was a reason why I fought to keep the dregs of the political
 RC>> echoes out of here.. Tim obsesses over topics, he aint done with
 RC>> climate change yet.

 LL>>                       -=end quote=-

 BM> which is the truth.  He has this quality of consistantly dredging up
 BM> nonsense to prove his point. Once, twice, even three times is ok but once
 BM> you're posting the same nonsense 10-15 times jut to antagonize, it gets to
 BM> be a tad too much.

Since when is expressing an opinion about climate change grounds
for censorship or removal from fidonet?

 BM> It's sorta like the thing Ross was saying about you.

What Ross Cassell said about me was criminal.  Janis Kracht should
have revoked his node immediately.  The fact that she chose to do
nothing speaks volumes about her lack of character.  But then, pond
scum do tend to attract each other.

[..]

 LL>> Ross Cassell does not believe in the concept of free speech,
 LL>> as embedded in the 1st Amendment (or elsewhere).  He believes
 LL>> only in free speech for himself and his small circle of like-
 LL>> minded friends.

 BM>>> Why do you bring him into it when it's always been
 BM>>> possible to link to others.

 LL>>> Ross Cassell has no legitimate authority to order the feed cut
 LL>>> of anybody in this echo.  He is not the editor/moderator of this
 LL>>> echo.  He is nothing more than a silly little boy who has nothing
 LL>>> better to do with himself than either jerk off or try to pretend
 LL>>> to be master of the universe, using fidonet as his playtoy.

 BM>> He didn't order a feed cut to Ed.

 LL>> He blackmailed Ed into submission.

 BM>> He spoke to Ed over giving Richardson a time out for his insanity.

 LL>> Permanent Time Out = Feed Cut

 BM> Where did I say, or Ross ever say, it  was permenant.

Do you see any messages by Tim Richardson posted from Ed's board?
Been a while, hasn't it?  There's a reason why ...

 BM>> When Ed spoke to Richardson over it, Richardson went nuts on Ed
 BM>> calling him every name in the book.

 LL>> Prove it.

 BM>> If I was Ed, I would have done the same thing.

 LL>> I don't suck cock.
 LL>> Not Ross' cock.
 LL>> Not Ed's cock.
 LL>> Not anybody's cock.
 LL>> But I do like pussy.
 LL>> I love pussy.
 LL>> I really love pussy.
 LL>> Pussy Galore.
 LL>> James Bond's favorite girlfriend.
 LL>> Or one of them, anyway.

 BM>> So tell me, where was the feed cut.

 LL>> Ask Ed.  He's the one who done it.

 BM> No, he banned Richardson from his board, which is his right even if it was
 BM> for a hangnail.

That's what you keep telling me.  And every time I ask you to put
up or shut up, you keep your mouth shut.  So where's your evidence?
Where is your proof?  Does it exist?  Remember, you are the one who
told me the cock and bull story about Ed having a discussion with
Tim.  So prove it.  If you can.

 BM>> I'm thinking you're just imagining it in your head.

 LL>> I imagine lots of stuff in my head.
 LL>> I also imagine lots of stuff outside my head.
 LL>> But I cannot even begin to imagine what is in your head.

 BM> Good... :)

 BM>> It should stay there.

 LL>> I would certainly hope so.

 BM>>> Your arguement holds no water.

 LL>>> There are no moderators in fidonet.  The participants
 LL>>> themselves are the echo.  How many times does David have
 LL>>> to tell you that?  How many times do others have to tell
 LL>>> you that?

 BM>> Then why are you always discussing it?

 LL>> Because some folks still don't get it.

 BM>> Why did you feel you needed to take over the DEBATE echo and declare
 BM>> yourself the Moderator and Richardson your co-moderator?

 LL>> The DEBATE echo belongs to everybody, as has always been the case.
 LL>> If you had bothered to read the rules, you would have realized that.

 LL>> Here are the rules for the DEBATE echo, as originally posted by me -

 BM> Those are your rules...

Those are everybody's rules.

 BM> not the rules of the listed moderator.

I am the listed moderator (the only one that counts).
There may be other moderators.  Many others.  But there
is only one that really counts.  And that one is me.

 BM> You highly complained when Roger was posting rules in FIDONEWS....

Roger is not the moderator.

 BM> yet you seem it's ok for you to do it in someone elses echo.

The echo belongs to everybody.

 BM> How manly.

"Is it manly?" - last words of Saddam Hussein

 BM> And you wonder why prople question your ethics.

The ethics of fidonet.  That would make a really neat title
for a psychostudy.  It could even earn me a PhD.  Somewhere.
Worked for Wayne Chirnside, who earned hers that way ...

--Lee

--- MesNews/1.08.05.00-gb
 * Origin: news://eljaco.se (2:203/2)