Text 31889, 150 rader
Skriven 2016-03-17 04:34:00 av Lee Lofaso (2:203/2)
  Kommentar till text 31887 av Bill McGarrity (24080.2fidonews)
Ärende: What kind of nonsense is this?
======================================
Hello Bill,

 LL>>> This is what Janis Kracht's monkey (Ross Cassell) had to say
 LL>>> about Tim Richardson (and all others Ross disagrees with) -

 BF>>> Can't you just ignore him, and let the rest of us make our own
 BF>>> decisions?

 RC>>> There was a reason why I fought to keep the dregs of the political
 RC>>> echoes out of here.. Tim obsesses over topics, he aint done with
 RC>>> climate change yet.

 LL>>>                       -=end quote=-

 BM>> which is the truth.  He has this quality of consistantly dredging BM>up
 BM> nonsense to prove his point. Once, twice, even three times is BK>ok but
 BM> once you're posting the same nonsense 10-15 times jut to BK>antagonize, it
 BM> gets to be a tad too much.

 LL>> Since when is expressing an opinion about climate change grounds
 LL>> for censorship or removal from fidonet?

 BM> Did I not explain that above? 10-15 times spewing the same thing over and
 BM> over again when the subject was dropped and was explained to the poster
 BM> we'd not discuss it anymore?

That's what Flat Earthers tried to tell Galileo.  But did it make
them right?  By censoring someone whose views they disagreed with,
Flat Earthers thought they could continue to fool the masses.  But
the only ones they were deluding were themselves.

 BM>>> So tell me, where was the feed cut.

 LL>>> Ask Ed.  He's the one who done it.

 BM>> No, he banned Richardson from his board, which is his right even BM>if it
 BM> was for a hangnail.

 LL>> That's what you keep telling me.  And every time I ask you to put
 LL>> up or shut up, you keep your mouth shut.  So where's your evidence?
 LL>> Where is your proof?  Does it exist?  Remember, you are the one who
 LL>> told me the cock and bull story about Ed having a discussion with
 LL>> Tim.  So prove it.  If you can.

 BM> Again, for the thrid time, ask Ed why.

You made the claim.  You support it, and substantiate it, if you can.
Otherwise, why should I, or anybody else, believe you (or Ed)?

 BM> It's his system and as I said, he can do whatever he wants with it.

Just because he can doesn't mean he should.  If an individual claims
to be in favor of free speech and acts in a far different manner, then
that individual has shown the world that he/she is not to be believed
or trusted.

 BM> What part of that do you not understand?

You made a claim, and failed to substantiate/support that claim.

I asked you to back up your claim with evidence/proof.  You have
been unable to do so.  That tells me you are either made it all
up, or have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.

 BM>>> I'm thinking you're just imagining it in your head.

 LL>>> I imagine lots of stuff in my head.
 LL>>> I also imagine lots of stuff outside my head.
 LL>>> But I cannot even begin to imagine what is in your head.

 BM>> Good... :)

 BM>>> It should stay there.

 LL>>> I would certainly hope so.

 BM>>>> Your arguement holds no water.

 LL>>>> There are no moderators in fidonet.  The participants
 LL>>>> themselves are the echo.  How many times does David have
 LL>>>> to tell you that?  How many times do others have to tell
 LL>>>> you that?

 BM>>> Then why are you always discussing it?

 LL>>> Because some folks still don't get it.

 BM>>> Why did you feel you needed to take over the DEBATE echo and declare
 BM>>> yourself the Moderator and Richardson your co-moderator?

 LL>>> The DEBATE echo belongs to everybody, as has always been the case.
 LL>>> If you had bothered to read the rules, you would have realized that.

 LL>>> Here are the rules for the DEBATE echo, as originally posted by me -

 BM>> Those are your rules...

 LL>> Those are everybody's rules.

 BM>> not the rules of the listed moderator.

 LL>> I am the listed moderator (the only one that counts).
 LL>> There may be other moderators.  Many others.  But there
 LL>> is only one that really counts.  And that one is me.

 BM> Mmmm... don't think so but it's your fantasy...

You have no idea what my fantasy is or might be.
Hell, I do not even know myself.  But I will when
I find it.  Kind of like shangri-la.  I will know
when I find it ...

 BM>> You highly complained when Roger was posting rules in FIDONEWS....

 LL>> Roger is not the moderator.

 BM>> yet you seem it's ok for you to do it in someone elses echo.

 LL>> The echo belongs to everybody.

 BM> Then why did you feel it necessary to put your name on it?

I put everybody's name on it.

 BM> Is it your Mt. Rushmore?

More like Mt. Driskill.

 BM>> How manly.

 LL>> "Is it manly?" - last words of Saddam Hussein

 BM> See where that got him...

Paradise.

 BM>> And you wonder why prople question your ethics.

 LL>> The ethics of fidonet.  That would make a really neat title
 LL>> for a psychostudy.  It could even earn me a PhD.  Somewhere.
 LL>> Worked for Wayne Chirnside, who earned hers that way ...

 BM> Go for it....

I already have my certificate.

--Lee

--- MesNews/1.08.05.00-gb
 * Origin: news://eljaco.se (2:203/2)