Text 5934, 94 rader
Skriven 2013-01-23 11:05:28 av mark lewis (1:3634/12.42)
   Kommentar till text 5900 av Nicholas Boel (17100.fidonews)
Ärende: Z4
==========
 ML> no... you can't count the percentage based on the number of 
 ML> people... out of the 10 or so times i've randomly polled his 
 ML> system during all this crap in here, i've connected with him 9 
 ML> times... only one time was i unable to but i attribute that to DNS 
 ML> problems which cleared up after a reboot of the firewall... so 
 ML> there's a 90% connection rate from my end... maybe i just got 
 ML> lucky and others haven't? based on this i should play the lottery?

 NB> The DNS problems I can agree with. But after they came up, I was
 NB> attacked by our Z1C while trying to discuss nodelist entries.

i'm sorry... i don't see that at all in the thread... not until afterward :?

 NB> You apparantly missed the topic I was supporting from the get-go, 
 NB> and sided with Janis from the start. :( 

i don't think so... in this topic, i got involved and irritated with you due to
the language you chose to use which read as very demeaning... it was after that
language that janis responded in kind and then put you in the twit bin...

 ML> since he apparently carries the full feed, he's probably reading 
 ML> all of this anyway... i'm extremely surprised that he has the 
 ML> restraint that he does because if i were him, i'd have blown this 
 ML> place all to hell with the  speculation and crap and really shoved 
 ML> some folks back in their places where they belong... but that's me 
 ML> and not him...

 NB> You know what? That would probably be fucking AWESOME if he replied
 NB> here. It woudl shut all of us up (or me, anyways). I would love for
 NB> him to show up and tell people off here. Maybe he has no idea what
 NB> is actually going on? 

i dunno... i do know that i have written OOB (out of band) messages to several
Z4 sysops and let them know of the shennanigans being pulled and the attempt to
remove Z4 from the nodelist... at least one of them was a Z4 at one time...
what they've done with that information i have no idea... but for fucktards to
sit out here lamblasting away when they don't have the first clue, well... they
get what they deserve and it will come around soon enough... karma has a way of
sneaking up on folks ya know? ;)

 NB>> I have seen it for myself. I tried connecting to both his BBS and
 NB>> his mailer a few times now (not one after the other, but at random
 NB>> times)

 ML> hunh?? bbs and mailer? the nodelist only lists mailers... where'd
 ML> you find info on connecting to his bbs?

 NB> I've seen random posts over the years in ads echos (yeah, I still
 NB> look at those, and call some randomly -- for those of you who
 NB> don't, you're killing our trade here). So I tried he MOMIA BBS. I
 NB> go a little further than the nodelist implies, as I'm sure you do.
 NB> You're just causing another reason for argument here.

no, i was asking a serious question... no clue how you saw that as an attempt
to start an argument :?

 ML> while i tend to agree, i can easily see extenuating circumstances 
 ML> and have been seeing their possibility contrary to others who 
 ML> insist on playing their "i'm right" games... paul's theory should 
 ML> have been thought of before by those stirring up all the shit but 
 ML> it didn't fit their agenda so they refused to look in that 
 ML> direction... i've pointed out over and over and over how we, as a 
 ML> network, are subject to the whims of the internet that so many 
 ML> have chosen to use for their main transport mechanism... i've been 
 ML> shouted down about that, too... until it came back and slapped them
 ML> square in their faces...

 NB> You, should have been on of the first to see Paul's response. Yet
 NB> you still argue. 

i was up and read it as soon as it came in, yes... i'm not arguing either...
i'm simply stating that i've pointed out things like this to others and yet
/they/ kept on... i won't mention any names but they live in Z2... i don't know
why you seem to see some things in reverse of what they are or what they state
but you do at times :?

 NB> Actually, the only reason we're still talking about this right now
 NB> is because you came into the conversation to say your piece. Janis
 NB> had already netmailed me, and we're done talking about it. Now all
 NB> of a sudden I'm in an argument wit you, which was unnecessary.

then why didn't you say that you had already been in contact with her via
netmail and it was all handled and over with?? YOU could have stopped it from
the get-go instead of letting it continue on... there was no way for me to know
about that conversation from out here :/

 NB> FIGHT-O-NET+1

Lack of Communication 101 - score A+

)\/(ark

--- 
 * Origin:  (1:3634/12.42)