Text 6029, 43 rader
Skriven 2013-01-25 19:52:40 av Roy Witt (1:387/22)
   Kommentar till text 6007 av Nicholas Boel (17207.fidonews)
Ärende: Z4
==========
Nicholas Boel wrote to Roy Witt:

 RW>> So, you could have done this all on your own, using a PVT listing
 RW>> and no one would be the wiser, if you didn't put a 'location' in the
 RW>> listing. Meanwhile, your new node could be working on this RC to get
 RW>> his shit together.

 NB> Well, it sort of happened like that. Except instead of a PVT listing
 NB> under my net, he was told to use a "temporary" node number under the
 NB> RC -- which Joe has pointed out a great bit today, that that
 NB> shouldn't have happened (/unless/ the RC was also the acting NC).

After reading some of the BS (pun intended) going back and forth now, that
RC is the NC of the net...I thought you said that your friend was in CA,
(whoops, just realized that CA is Canada and not California). Now I
understand it perfectly.

 NB> The RC should have let the applicant know who the appropriate NC was,
 NB> so he could go from there.

Your friend was using 140/999 or 17/999?

 NB>>> He actually did, amusingly enough. And told him that the netmail
 NB>>> has to be setup directly with the RC. You see, we've already tried
 NB>>> that and let him know it wasn't working properly.. so there's
 NB>>> really only one thing left to do..

 RW>> List him in your net.

 NB> Agreed. I have one more option that we're going to try, which is
 NB> still the promoted way of doing things, just bypassing the person
 NB> that couldn't get his shit together. We'll see how that goes, I
 NB> guess.

More later...



         R\%/itt


--- GoldED+/W32 1.1.5-31012
 * Origin: Texas Lone-Star - Texan, American, USAian  (1:387/22)