Text 932, 84 rader
Skriven 2012-07-19 15:42:37 av mark lewis (1:3634/12.0)
    Kommentar till text 925 av Torbjorn Mohn (2:211/37)
Ärende: .fidonet
================
WARNING: manual reflowing of quotes has been performed on this message

> right... if there are no message arriving here with that 2d address 
> in the path, i cannot map them...
> i note that kim has 5 addresses listed in nodelist.195...
> 2:22/222  BBBS Help - regional independent

 TM> That was the one i meant. MY TYPO.. sorry.... 2:22/222 is the one I
 TM> use from here, and the one where i collect the BBBS support echoes.
 TM> Still it's not there....

not a problem... with all those 2's, it is easy for anyone to typo it... i had
to be careful when i was typing them all out, too ;)

[trim]

>> Messages I write here, messages Bj•rn writes from 2:203/2
>> does not appear in the Fidonews echo there.
> on kim's system? which one? there could easily be a typo with all those 2's
> involved...

 TM> It's ONE system, with a number og AKA's... 2:22/222 and 2:222/2 and
 TM> 2:222/222 and 2:222/42 are all the same system. I dunno why he uses
 TM> different Node numbers.... When I telnet there and write a message,
 TM> i telnet bbbs.net which is 2:222/42.

ahh... ok... the AKAs on one system makes sense... it is what i do here as do
many others in the network...

>> Lots of other messages do, but I suspect that somwhere messages
>> passing through 2:203/2 outbound are filtered away?
> that is possible but i don't think that björn would be that stupid... 
> it would get found out and pretty quickly, i'd guess... i remember 
> back in the day when someone was stuffing the seenbys and how quickly 
> that it was found out who was doing it...

 TM> No, I did NOT mean that Björn is doing it, 

in the track from you back to kim's, björn is the first in the path... i'm not
saying that björn is doing it but that there may be a typo in his tosser
configs... i don't know... i don't knw what tosser he is using at this time...
it is the first logical place to inquire after looking yours over very
carefully... you haven't had to make any changes since björn and others moved
to that fancy new distribution system, have you? we know that he has as have
others as well but what those changes are i don't know...

 TM> what I suspect is that someone else is sensoring messages that has 
 TM> passed through 2:203/0 on their way?

i don't know... if that were so, i'd not be seeing your posts, would i?

the recent posts from you have this path...

  @ATH: 211/37 203/0 320/119 123/500

have you asked björn if kim is connected there? kim is obviously connected
somewhere... the question is where and the only way to find that out is to
ask... you've asked kim with no response... have you considered asking others
if kim is connected with them? maybe a post in enet.sysop or what ever it is
called is in order?

[trim]

>> I don't know what to conclude out of this, but somewhere out there
>> somthing rotten is still going on.
> it could be simple human error and it is taking other eyes to see
> it... i'd be checking that address you are writing for kim's 
> system... it isn't listed in the nodelist but it may have been typoed 
> in this message or possibly in the nodelist... some systems won't 
> process mail for nodes not in the nodelist... and then there's the 
> whole secure/insecure connection thing... a typo could easily result 
> in the mail being dumped into the insecure directory and then being 
> sent to /dev/nul...

 TM> I don't think this is the case here. Messages written in other
 TM> echoes at BCG-Box (bbbs.net) is flowing fine....

so that would seem to indicate that it is limited to one area... this could
still easily be a typo... or possibly even a security setting where kim's
system has somehow been set for readonly or writeonly...

)\/(ark

 * Origin:  (1:3634/12)