Text 9969, 220 rader
Skriven 2013-08-22 11:27:01 av Roy Witt (1:387/22)
   Kommentar till text 9965 av Lee Lofaso (2:203/2)
Ärende: How to raise a panic
============================
Lee Lofaso wrote to Roy Witt:

 LL> Hello Roy,

 LL>>> IOW, the phrase "elected ... more than twice" is reference to a
 LL>>> particular president who serves one or two consecutive terms.

 RW>>> George Washington and FDR...the latter served 4 terms, which is the
 RW>>> reason for the 22nd amendment. Roosevelt wasn't very effect during
 RW>>> his 3rd and 4th terms.

 LL>>> Consecutive terms.  You got that right.  And so did Bill Clinton -

 RW>> Bill hasn't been right since the day he was born.

 LL> And Republicans claim they are against abortion.  What hypocrites!

Who said anything about abortion in this discussion. Please try to keep
up...

 LL>>> If that same person were to be elected to another term, he/she
 LL>>> would be a different president.

 RW>>> Wrong. That person would fit the description of 'elected' to a 1st
 RW>>> and 2nd consecutive term...

 LL>>> Dear boy,

 RW>> I'm not your boy, nigger.

 LL> Good god, I should hope not.

Thankfully, I'm not as black as you think.

 LL>>> you really should learn how to count.  FDR was one president, not
 LL>>> four presidents.

 RW>> You should learn how to count, properly. FDR was one president who
 RW>> served, but not all of, 4 terms in office.

 LL> FDR was elected to four terms, but his term in office was for 12
 LL> consecutive years, from 1933 to 1945.  One president, not four.

Four terms, read A-22 again.

 LL>>> Grover Cleveland was two presidents, not one.

 RW>> The 22nd didn't apply to him,

 LL> Irrelevant.

As are you.

 RW>> but had he served after such 22nd amendment, he couldn't serve a
 RW>> third.

 LL> Grover Cleveland served one term as the 22nd President,
 LL> but not a second term.

Yes he served a second term, as you're about to prove.

 LL> Grover Cleveland served one term as the 24th President,
 LL> but not a second term.

His 2nd term...count the man, not the number of Presidents.

 LL> Even though there was no constitutional provision barring
 LL> either president from being elected to a consecutive term(s).

Never has been, which makes your statement irrlevent.

 LL>>> Here is an example, which I thought I had made clear the first time

 RW>> When yuor mind is as clear as mud, there isn't anything that is
 RW>> clear.

 LL> Thank God for Everclear.

That'll cloud your brain in stupor...

 LL>>> Grover Cleveland, 22nd President of the United States, 1885-1889.
 LL>>> Grover Cleveland, 24th President of the United States, 1893-1897.
 LL>>> One person (Grover Cleveland), two elected presidents (22, 24).

 RW>> Read the amendment again...

 LL> What is it you fail to understand?

Looking at yourself in mirrors and asking yourself that question won't do
you any good.

 RW>> your example doesn't fly with Cleveland either.

 LL> Grover Cleveland is dead.  So is the other Grover Cleveland.

So is everybody else born in 1840...

 RW>>> You're attempting to apply the 22nd Constitutioal amendment to a
 RW>>> person who it wouldn't apply to. i.e. GC was President two times
 RW>>> but much earlier than the 22nd amendment was passed by Congress in
 RW>>> 1947 and ratified by the states in 1951..

 LL>>> Bill Clinton is the 42nd President of the United States.

 RW>> Oh, well in that case, he was elected to an 8 year term?

 LL> Bill Clinton's term in office included having been elected to two
 LL> consecutive terms.

So, that makes him ineligible to run for President for a 3rd term...

 LL>   The same is true of several other presidents,
 LL> such as Dwight D. Eisenhower, Ronald Reagan, George W. Bush, Barack
 LL> Obama ...

We wish so on the latter, but unfortunately, it isn't true. As is
everything else you have to say.

 LL>>> If elected in 2016, he would also be the 45th President of
 LL>>> the United States.  See how that works?  One person, two
 LL>>> presidents.

 RW>> Read the amendment again. Clear your mind of all the mud first.

 LL> Bill Clinton is a lawyer.  As such, he knows the true meaning
 LL> of the word "is".  So does Hillary, but she's keeping quiet.

Bill Clinton is like you, he doesn't know shit if he has to ask what the
meaning of is, is...

 LL>>> This also works with Jimmy Carter.  And George H.W. Bush.  And
 LL>>> George W. Bush.  As for Barack Obama, he'll have to wait until he
 LL>>> sits out a term before he can become another president.

 RW>> Wrong. Jimmy Carter and HW Bush could run again,

 LL> Of course they can.  They are both alive, aren't they?

Yeup. Plus they've only been elected President once...

 RW>> but W couldn't

 LL> Of course he can.  He's still alive.  Not that he'd win.
 LL> But he is still alive.

He's still alive, but he isn't elegible to run for President...

 RW>> as he has already served his two terms,

 LL> If elected to another term, it would be a new first term.
 LL> See how that works?

I see how confused you are. W can't run for a 3rd term.

 RW>> nor will Hussein Obama ever be President again.

 LL> Not to worry.  President Clinton will appoint him to be a justice
 LL> on the US Supreme Court.  That will keep him happy, and quite busy.

See, I told you that you are confused.

 LL> I'm talking about Hillary, not Bill.  So don't get your hopes up.

Hillary isn't going to be President. You heard it here first.

 RW>>> No Constitutional Amendments have ever been retroactive and
 RW>>> the 22nd is no exception.

 LL>>> We can pass an amendment to repeal the 22nd amendment,

 RW>> What's this 'we' BS, do you have a mouse in your pocket?

 LL> Me and Hillary.  We are channelling.  My thoughts are her thoughts,
 LL> and her thoughts are my thoughts ...

No wonder the two of you are so fucked up in the brain.

 LL>>> just like we passed an amendment (21st) to repeal the 18th
 LL>>> amendment (prohibition).  In fact, legislation has been introduced
 LL>>> in the house to do just that ...

 RW>> By whom?

 LL> US Rep. Sherrod, I think.  He brings it up every few years.  Hasn't
 LL> gotten past committee yet, but one day it will.  Just give him a few
 LL> more tries ...

He should get a clue...if it doesn't get past committee, it isn't going
anywhere but into his back pocket.

 RW>> What fool would want to bring back prohibition?

 LL> US Senator Rand Paul?  Or US Representative Paul Ryan?

Rand is working on ridding the nation of forced union labor. Meanwhile,
Paul Ryan is working on defunding Obama Care.

 RW>>> More Lofaso moronic rambling deleted because of the deceptive
 RW>>> writing by the author.

 RW>> Repeated for your clarity...

 LL> Rubbing eyes.

If you didn't spew so much shit and sputter, you would also be able to see
clearly.

 RW>>           R\%/itt

 LL> Looks like somebody is holding a bubbly drink ...

Well then, go piss in it and take a swig...


         R\%/itt


--- GoldED+/W32 1.1.5-31012
--- D'Bridge 3.92
 * Origin: Lone Star BBS San Antonio, Texas - USA - (1:387/22)