Text 10223, 59 rader
Skriven 2018-11-10 00:21:32 av andrew clarke (3:633/267)
Ärende: FTS-1 and FTS-4
=======================
09 Nov 18 02:34, Andrew Leary wrote to Björn Felten:

 BF>>    Well, you've now seen my attempts. I'm sure that with you
 BF>> onboard the FTSC could really start making a difference, cleaning
 BF>> out all the dusty old stuff and paving way for some novelties.

 AL> FTS-1 really could be split into several documents.  The stored message
 AL> definition section is useful information, but not absolutely required
 AL> for a FTS-1 compatible implementation.  The packet header and packed
 AL> message definitions are the key components to how things work in
 AL> FidoNet.  The FTS-1 session protocol is largely obsolete, although in
 AL> theory any dialup node is required to support inbound FTS-1 sessions
 AL> during their Zone's Mail Hour.

Some of this has been spoken about years ago then forgotten about.

Andrew Leary is spot on.

Policy4 refers only to FTS-1 with regards to ZMH. Obviously this only applies
to the small number of dialup nodes we have in 2018, relative to Internet
nodes.

For dialup nodes, honouring ZMH was (and still is) the absolutely bare minimum
necessary to be nodelisted. Their phone number could be freely used for
BBS/voice/fax/other services outside ZMH. There were a few dialup nodes in the
mid '90s that operated that way.

Expanding on Andrew's suggestion, I propose that:

1. FTS-0001.017 should be issued, superceding FTS-0001.016.

2. The newly issued FTS-0001.017 is used solely as a reference document that
only points to other documents, for ease of maintenance.

3. FTS-0001.016 should be renamed FSC-0001.016 to be used as an historical
reference, and is otherwise left completely untouched. This completely bypasses
potential issues with the document's copyright.

4. We prioritise documenting the required (non-optional) parts of a compatible
node, especially Internet nodes, as they are the obvious majority of FidoNet in
2018.

5. Ensure these parts are documented separately, again for ease of maintenance,
and refer to them in the new FTS-1.

6. (optional, but probably sensible) Have FTS-0001.017 refer to (and apply to)
FSC-0001.016 in the case of remaining dialup nodes. Effectively this would mean
the new FTS-1 would apply only to Internet nodes. This could obviously change
in future as the need arises, with further issues of FTS-1.

7. Re-document the optional parts (eg. stored message format) as time and
interest permits. In the interim simply refer to the appropriate section in
FSC-0001.016.

Regards
Andrew

--- GoldED+/BSD 1.1.5-b20180707
 * Origin: Blizzard of Ozz, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (3:633/267)