Text 1466, 53 rader
Skriven 2008-03-24 20:20:32 av mark lewis (1:3634/12.0)
   Kommentar till text 1401 av Alexey Vissarionov (2:5020/545)
Ärende: Nomination
==================
 FR>>> After all, isn't the purpose of FTSC to make the lives of the *C
 FR>>> easier by streamlining the technical policies and enhancing the
 FR>>> overall operation of the network?

 ml>> no! the FTSC's only purpose in life is to document existing
 ml>> practise... nothing else...

 AV>> You mean, we have nothing to deal with reviewing standards,
 AV>> auditing proposals, pointing out possible incompatibility|security
 AV>> issues etc?

 ml> no... reviewing standards and auditing proposals falls within
 ml> "document existing practise"... pointing out incompatibility and
 ml> security issues would fall in with reviewing prospective proposals
 ml> before they are accepted...

 AV> So, do you mean we should sit on our asses and wait for someone to
 AV> point these issues out for us?

where do you get that from my statements? do you not understand my last
sentenence in the above? here's i'll state it again...

 ml> pointing out incompatibility and security issues would fall in 
 ml> with reviewing prospective proposals before they are accepted...

so, in other words, the task of pointing incompatibilities and security issues
would/should come BEFORE the proposal is accepted by the FTSC, period.

what's so hard about that?

 ml>> the FTSC doesn't create the practise or come up with something,
 ml>> document it and force it into place and make everyone comply with
 ml>> it...

 AV>> Why, being such a reversionist, you have accepted your nomination
 AV>> as a FTSC candidate?

 ml> did you really have to ask that? surely you already know the 
 ml> answer?

 AV> Yes, it was a rhetorical question...

obviously...

 ml> or are you asking me a "candidate question"?

 AV> ... but it would be nice if you answer it.

since it is rhetorical, i think i'll pass ;)

)\/(ark

 * Origin:  (1:3634/12)