Tillbaka till svenska Fidonet
English   Information   Debug  
FIDONEWS_OLD4   0/37224
FIDO_SYSOP   12852
FIDO_UTIL   0/180
FILEFIND   0/209
FILEGATE   0/212
FILM   0/18
FNEWS_PUBLISH   4393
FN_SYSOP   41678
FN_SYSOP_OLD1   71952
FTP_FIDO   0/2
FTSC_PUBLIC   896/13598
FUNNY   0/4886
GENEALOGY.EUR   0/71
GET_INFO   105
GOLDED   0/408
HAM   0/16069
HOLYSMOKE   0/6791
HOT_SITES   0/1
HTMLEDIT   0/71
HUB203   466
HUB_100   264
HUB_400   39
HUMOR   0/29
IC   0/2851
INTERNET   0/424
INTERUSER   0/3
IP_CONNECT   719
JAMNNTPD   0/233
JAMTLAND   0/47
KATTY_KORNER   0/41
LAN   0/16
LINUX-USER   0/19
LINUXHELP   0/1155
LINUX   0/22090
LINUX_BBS   0/957
mail   18.68
mail_fore_ok   249
MENSA   0/341
MODERATOR   0/102
MONTE   0/992
MOSCOW_OKLAHOMA   0/1245
MUFFIN   0/783
MUSIC   0/321
N203_STAT   924
N203_SYSCHAT   313
NET203   321
NET204   69
NET_DEV   0/10
NORD.ADMIN   0/101
NORD.CHAT   0/2572
NORD.FIDONET   189
NORD.HARDWARE   0/28
NORD.KULTUR   0/114
NORD.PROG   0/32
NORD.SOFTWARE   0/88
NORD.TEKNIK   0/58
NORD   0/453
OCCULT_CHAT   0/93
OS2BBS   0/787
OS2DOSBBS   0/580
OS2HW   0/42
OS2INET   0/37
OS2LAN   0/134
OS2PROG   0/36
OS2REXX   0/113
OS2USER-L   207
OS2   0/4786
OSDEBATE   0/18996
PASCAL   0/490
PERL   0/457
PHP   0/45
POINTS   0/405
POLITICS   0/29554
POL_INC   0/14731
PSION   103
R20_ADMIN   1121
R20_AMATORRADIO   0/2
R20_BEST_OF_FIDONET   13
R20_CHAT   0/893
R20_DEPP   0/3
R20_DEV   399
R20_ECHO2   1379
R20_ECHOPRES   0/35
R20_ESTAT   0/719
R20_FIDONETPROG...
...RAM.MYPOINT
  0/2
R20_FIDONETPROGRAM   0/22
R20_FIDONET   0/248
R20_FILEFIND   0/24
R20_FILEFOUND   0/22
R20_HIFI   0/3
R20_INFO2   3207
R20_INTERNET   0/12940
R20_INTRESSE   0/60
R20_INTR_KOM   0/99
R20_KANDIDAT.CHAT   42
R20_KANDIDAT   28
R20_KOM_DEV   112
R20_KONTROLL   0/13259
R20_KORSET   0/18
R20_LOKALTRAFIK   0/24
R20_MODERATOR   0/1852
R20_NC   76
R20_NET200   245
R20_NETWORK.OTH...
...ERNETS
  0/13
R20_OPERATIVSYS...
...TEM.LINUX
  0/44
R20_PROGRAMVAROR   0/1
R20_REC2NEC   534
R20_SFOSM   0/340
R20_SF   0/108
R20_SPRAK.ENGLISH   0/1
R20_SQUISH   107
R20_TEST   2
R20_WORST_OF_FIDONET   12
RAR   0/9
RA_MULTI   106
RA_UTIL   0/162
REGCON.EUR   0/2056
REGCON   0/13
SCIENCE   0/1206
SF   0/239
SHAREWARE_SUPPORT   0/5146
SHAREWRE   0/14
SIMPSONS   0/169
STATS_OLD1   0/2539.065
STATS_OLD2   0/2530
STATS_OLD3   0/2395.095
STATS_OLD4   0/1692.25
SURVIVOR   0/495
SYSOPS_CORNER   0/3
SYSOP   0/84
TAGLINES   0/112
TEAMOS2   0/4530
TECH   0/2617
TEST.444   0/105
TRAPDOOR   0/19
TREK   0/755
TUB   0/290
UFO   0/40
UNIX   0/1316
USA_EURLINK   0/102
USR_MODEMS   0/1
VATICAN   0/2740
VIETNAM_VETS   0/14
VIRUS   0/378
VIRUS_INFO   0/201
VISUAL_BASIC   0/473
WHITEHOUSE   0/5187
WIN2000   0/101
WIN32   0/30
WIN95   0/4288
WIN95_OLD1   0/70272
WINDOWS   0/1517
WWB_SYSOP   0/419
WWB_TECH   0/810
ZCC-PUBLIC   0/1
ZEC   4

 
4DOS   0/134
ABORTION   0/7
ALASKA_CHAT   0/506
ALLFIX_FILE   0/1313
ALLFIX_FILE_OLD1   0/7997
ALT_DOS   0/152
AMATEUR_RADIO   0/1039
AMIGASALE   0/14
AMIGA   0/331
AMIGA_INT   0/1
AMIGA_PROG   0/20
AMIGA_SYSOP   0/26
ANIME   0/15
ARGUS   0/924
ASCII_ART   0/340
ASIAN_LINK   0/651
ASTRONOMY   0/417
AUDIO   0/92
AUTOMOBILE_RACING   0/105
BABYLON5   0/17862
BAG   135
BATPOWER   0/361
BBBS.ENGLISH   0/382
BBSLAW   0/109
BBS_ADS   0/5290
BBS_INTERNET   0/507
BIBLE   0/3563
BINKD   0/1119
BINKLEY   0/215
BLUEWAVE   0/2173
CABLE_MODEMS   0/25
CBM   0/46
CDRECORD   0/66
CDROM   0/20
CLASSIC_COMPUTER   0/378
COMICS   0/15
CONSPRCY   0/899
COOKING   32712
COOKING_OLD1   0/24719
COOKING_OLD2   0/40862
COOKING_OLD3   0/37489
COOKING_OLD4   0/35496
COOKING_OLD5   9370
C_ECHO   0/189
C_PLUSPLUS   0/31
DIRTY_DOZEN   0/201
DOORGAMES   0/2053
DOS_INTERNET   0/196
duplikat   6002
ECHOLIST   0/18295
EC_SUPPORT   0/318
ELECTRONICS   0/359
ELEKTRONIK.GER   1534
ENET.LINGUISTIC   0/13
ENET.POLITICS   0/4
ENET.SOFT   0/11701
ENET.SYSOP   33888
ENET.TALKS   0/32
ENGLISH_TUTOR   0/2000
EVOLUTION   0/1335
FDECHO   0/217
FDN_ANNOUNCE   0/7068
FIDONEWS   24099
FIDONEWS_OLD1   0/49742
FIDONEWS_OLD2   0/35949
FIDONEWS_OLD3   0/30874
Möte FTSC_PUBLIC, 13598 texter
 lista första sista föregående nästa
Text 394, 247 rader
Skriven 2005-06-29 07:03:06 av Scott Little (3:712/848)
Ärende: FRL-1016.001 RC1
========================
**********************************************************************
FTSC                             FIDONET TECHNICAL STANDARDS COMMITTEE
**********************************************************************

Publication:  FRL-1016
Revision:     1 (release candidate 1)
Title:        Integration of IP-Nodes in the nodelist
Author:       Lothar Behet
Issue Date:   8 July 2005
Review Date:  N/A
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Contents:
              1. Required fields according to FTS-0005, basic flags
                 for IP-nodes
              2. Optional extensions
              3. Addendum
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Status of this document
-----------------------

  This document is a Fidonet Reference Library document (FRL).

  This document preserves FSP-1012.003, which was incorporated into
  FTS-5000.002 and FTS-5001.002.

  This document is released to the public domain, and may be used,
  copied or modified for any purpose whatever.


Abstract
--------

  A variety of nodelist flags designed to aid the transfer of FidoNet
  Technology mail over IP links have entered common usage.
  This document specifies a new protocol for handling a session
  between two Fidonet Technology systems, and requests discussion
  and suggestions for improvements from the Fidonet community.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

1.  Description of the nodelist format
--------------------------------------

  Every node entry contains the following 8 fields:

  keyword,node_number,node_name,location,sysop_name,
                                    phone_number,baud_rate,flags

  Certain fields have defined values according to FTS-0005.

1.1.  Implementation for IP-connectivity
      Because of the limited characterset in the phone_field and
      to avoid any misinterpretion by conventional dialing, the
      ip-specific address-information is entered in another field
      and there are additional flags required.

1.1.1.  Field #1 (keyword) is PVT for an ip-only node without
        conventional phone number related connectivity. In this
        case, the phone field contains "-Unpublished-" according
        to FTS-0005.

1.1.2.  Field #2 (node_number) contains the node number within
        his net and zone.

1.1.3.  Field #3 (node_name) is used for the FQDN (Fully
        Qualified Domain Name) or the static ip-address.

1.1.4.  Field #4 (location) contains the geographical location
        of the node. While some nets/regions cannot supply their
        ip-only nodes with a adequate link, these nodes may be
        collected in a seperate net or region, until their
        original net/region support additional ip-connectivity.
        This special net/region is definitely a temporary solution
        for routing within a region or zone!

1.1.5.  Field #5 (sysop_name) represants the name of the system
        operator.

1.1.6.  Field #6 (phone_number) contains the phone_number for
        conventional connectivity. In case of an ip-only node
        it must contain "-Unpublished-".

1.1.7.  Field #7 (baud_rate) contains the maximum baud rate for
        conventional connectivity or 300 in case of an ip_only
        node.

1.1.8.  Field #8 (flags) represents operational definitions for
        the node. The ip-flags consist of two parts:
        A basic transport and an optional non-standard port,
        seperated by a colon.
        The default port may be omitted, but is listed as
        optional parameter in this document. In some cases,
        two flag names are mentioned:
        The second one is supported by some software nowadays,
        but these values may conflict with other programs, which
        not completely decode the length of each individual flag
        (i.e. TELN conflicts with the T-flag for online-time)
        The additional flags for ip-nodes are:

1.1.8.1.  IBN[:24554]
          (old flag from Argus: BND[:24554])
          BinkP protocol

1.1.8.2.  IFC[:60179]
          Raw protocol as used by ifcico

1.1.8.3.  ITN[:23]
          (old flag from Argus: TEL[:23])
          Telnet protocol. Some variants of ifcico support
          Telnet on port 60177, which should be added as
          additional flag ITN:60177.

1.1.8.4.  IVM[:3141]
          Vmodem protocol according to Ray Gwinn's SIO-package
          for OS/2

1.1.8.5.  IP
          General flag for special protocol specifications, if
          the flags 1.1.8.1. to 1.1.8.4. are not conclusive.

1.1.9.  Comments on the proposed nodelist flags
        The additional flagnames in () are supported at this
        moment by Argus, based on the use in z2r50. But the
        TEL[NET]-flag stays in conflict with  the generally in
        all zones and regions used T-flag (online time according
        to FSC-0062).


2.  Optional extensions for future use
--------------------------------------

  While the above mentioned flags (1.1.8.1 to 1.1.8.4) define a
  minimum set of operational flags for ip-nodes, several additions
  are already foreseeable at this moment.

2.1.  Additional sessions_handshake parameters
      There is at least one program, which supports several
      transport protocols according to chapter 1.1.8. on a
      single port. If other programs should imitate this habit,
      then the following extension to the flag suite 1.1.8.
      (transport[:port[:handshake]]) is advised:

2.1.1.  FTS-0001 session handshake:   1
2.1.2.  Yoohoo session handshake  :   Y
2.1.3.  EMSI sessions handshake   :   E
2.1.4.  BinkP sessions handshake  :   B

2.2.  Non-handshaking protocols
      While the definitions until this chapter describe direct
      handshaking sessions with optional password authentification,
      there are several other methods for the tunneling of fidonet
      data via the internet available.
      The setup of these connections does not rely on the nodelist
      (at this moment of writing), but we can think of standard
      setup procedures to use the nodelist for configuration of
      this additional transport methods.
      Therefore the following flags 2.2.1. to 2.2.4. are advised
      for at least informational purpose.

2.2.1.  IFT
        FTP (File Transfer Protocol)
        generally FTP via "anonymous" access does not implement
        any privacy or security, so it should just be used as an
        informational flag for interested downlinks.
        Session authentification can be arranged by individual
        configuration for both participants.

2.2.2.  ITX
        TransX, an Email based method for mostly Uuencoded
        data transfer of packets and files. TransX implements
        transfer verification with optional acknowledgement
        messages.

2.2.3.  IUC
        Uuencoded packet (one packet per message)

2.2.4.  IMI
        Mime based content encapsulation with standard
        multipart messages

2.2.5.  ISE
        SEAT encapsulation with optional acknowledgement messages

2.2.6.  IEM
        Email based (generally, without exact specification at this
        moment)


2.3.    Address information for email based procedures
        This can be stored on several places:

2.3.1.  flag suffix         this gives many possiblities, but may
                            interfere with the maximum length of a
                            nodelist entry (158 chars in case of
                            MakeNl).
        General flag format:    <flag>[:<@address]
        flag:         ITX,IUC,IMI,ISE,IEM
        @address:  an email address containing the "@" character

2.3.2.  location            Does not interfere with ip-mailer, but
                            suppresses another field in the nodelist

2.3.3.  System_name         prohibits ip-mailer operation at the same
                            time and requires additional logic for
                            a reliable retrieval

2.3.4.  Hints for address specification (email flags)
        According to the maximum line lenght of a nodelist entry,
        IEM:<@address> should be prefered for several formats on
        the same address, while each flag can hold its individual
        address, if required.
        If such an entry does not match the line length requirement,
        then the location may be used for the most general address
        (normally IEM:@address>).

        This should allow a maximum flexibility for email
        representation in the limited environment of the
        St.Louis nodelist format.


3.  Addendum
------------

  This proposal is based on a maximum compatibility to generally used
  definitions and standards within the Fidonet community.

  Future developments might make additions necessary, if they can not
  be expressed with the existing set of flags.


A.  History
-----------

  Rev.1,      991001: Initial public version prepared for FTSC
  Rev.2,      990611: Moved 2.2.4 to 2.2.6
                      Added 2.2.4, 2.2.5, 2.3 and 4
  Rev.3,      990627: Added some explanations in 2.2.1 to 2.2.5
  ------      050708: Reassigned to FRL-1016.001

**********************************************************************


-- Scott Little  [fidonet#3:712/848 / sysgod@sysgod.org]

--- GoldED+/W32 1.1.5-31012
 * Origin: Cyberia: 100% Grade "A" mansteak baby. (3:712/848)