Text 8439, 33 rader
Skriven 2017-01-31 08:17:16 av Nicholas Boel (1:154/10)
   Kommentar till text 8438 av Michiel van der Vlist (2:280/5555)
�rende: FSP-1040.001 Draft #3
=============================
Hello Michiel,

On Tue Jan 31 2017 14:52:44, Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Nicholas Boel:

 MV> One can propose anything one wants. If someone insist on submitting a
 MV> proposal where it is proposed that pi shall be treated as equal to
 MV> three in Fidonet, the FTSC will not refuse it.

 MV> But as I already wrote, there is a difference between a proposal and a
 MV> standard. FTSC standards should be written on the basis of "if you do
 MV> it like this, it will work". A proposal to threat pi as three or
 MV> allowing "24" for the hour field, will never be promoted to a standard
 MV> since it violates the above basic rule.

Have you done anything with the proposal since it has been submitted? Here's
what a search on ftsc.org comes up with:

Found 0 documents containing 'FSP-1040'

Rather than big dealing the proposal, why don't we cover all the bickering and
arguing in the FTSC echo when it comes time to raise said proposal to a
standard. Unless you and the rest of the FTSC were planning on making it a
standard right away, bypassing the proposal stage? I didn't think that was how
things worked, though.. which is why I'm submitting said proposal in it's
original form rather than editing it for yours and Wilfred's needs only for it
to be a proposal.

Regards,
Nick

... "Не зна��. Я зде��ь ��олько рабо��а��."
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20161221
 * Origin: thePharcyde_ distribution system (Wisconsin) (1:154/10)