Text 379, 113 rader
Skriven 2006-11-17 12:16:15 av God Dan (1:138/666.0)
     Kommentar till en text av MATT CLARK
Ärende: left wing fundies are scary
===================================
-> On 16 Nov 06  10:08:12, MATT CLARK got back to GOD DAN 
-> Re: left wing fundies are scary

 ->  MC> More like sitting in a corner amusing yourself with your own
 ->  MC> imagination. 
 -> 
 -> I'm not the one imagining all powerful beings that enjoy watching 
 -> people die.  

 MC> Where are you getting 'enjoy' from.  Oh yes, that imagination of
 MC> yours, like I just said.  Keep talking, Mr.god dan.

Oh, so your god doesn't give a rats ass about what happens to 
his creations then.  

 ->  MC> People like you have no sense of right and wrong, so it's
 -> 
 -> Oh, really?  Because I don't buy into your religion I go around 
 -> killing people?
 
 -> Oh, wait a minute, that what religious zealots 

 MC> Not to be confused about zealots who believe in nothing.

And which ones are those that are going around killing people?  

 
 -> do to non-believers!  

 MC> Since you feel God doesn't exist, what's wrong with killing anyone? 
 MC> After all, they're just walking pieces of meat with no souls.

Once again, you avoid the very simple answer:  If you don't want 
others to kill you, you don't start off by killing them.  


 MC> And for your information, just as many, if not more people have died
 MC> at  the hands of atheists.  
 
Try again.  Religion has been the cause of more deaths than any 
other cause ever.  


 ->  MC> easy for you to  come around using some fake name while you crap 
 ->  MC> on the hopes, beliefs and  aspirations of other people. 
 -> 
 -> Who's crapping on their hopes or aspirations?  

 MC> Like I just said, people like you, just as you've demonstrated,
 MC> several  times now.  Work on the memory problem.

Stop projecting your need to get rid of everything that doesn't 
fit your myopic religious views and trying to pawn them off 
on the non-believers.  

 
 -> Oh, yeah:  That the religious groups that look undkindly ...

 MC> Wrong once again. Most religious peole try to spread the word.  It's
 MC> people  like yourself that hit bottom when they do.
 
The word is still being sporead with a sword.  


 -> ...at independent thought.  

 MC> Independent thought?  From you??   I've seen no such thing coming from
 MC> you.  Just the usual reliance on those you expect to provide physcal
 MC> proof. Nothing more. Your no account approach doesn't even begin to
 MC> prove your case.

IOW, you trust your belief to be real with absolutely no evidence 
of anything to back it up.  Too bad for you.  


 MC> I never claimed I could prove anything.  You're the one who's
 MC> demanding proof...all the while you can't live up to your own

Until you provide evidence why should I belive a thing you say about 
your 3 in one oily god?  


 MC> At least religious people make an attempt to explain God.  People like

Explain why your All Powerful Omnipotent God allows innocent people 
to suffer.  

 MC> haven't. All you've done is sit there waitibng for someone to spoon
 MC> feed you physical proof about something that is beyond physical.

Daisy, the Invisible Pink Hippo, is shitting on your head as we speak.  


 MC> If you're so sure God doesn't exist then you must have 'something' of
 MC> YOUR OWN to show for.  You don't.  All you've done is bark at those
 MC> who  have made such efforts.  Real 'independent'.

I just gave you Daisy.  Prove She doesn't exist.  

 MC> If you want to prove you're a 'fast runner', you'll never do it by 
 MC> faulting those whom you 'feel' don't run fast. Thus far that's all
 MC> you've  done around here. Chew on that Mr. 'independent thought'.  I
 MC> say all you'll  come back with is more of your smug bullshit. Give us
 MC> another demonstration.

I'll be waiting for your disproof of Daisy.  




... Belief is acceptance without question. Thinking requires effort.
--- OMX/Blue Wave/DOS v2.30
 * Origin: Soundly on the Fault Line (1:138/666.0)