Text 4012, 72 rader
Skriven 2009-04-02 03:54:53 av God Dan (1:138/666.0)
     Kommentar till en text av Ross Cassell
Ärende: Just for the fun of i
=============================
-> On 31 Mar 09  15:23:35, Ross Cassell got back to God Dan 
-> Re: Just for the fun of i

 GD> Debate what?  Ed and crew avoid all questions that aren't "of the body".
 GD> They ignore facts that are contradictory to what they state.

 RC> So what are your alternatives?

 RC> A Atheist mutual admiration society?

If it comes down to that, yes.  Few Echoes allow any religious debate. Those 
that do often allow only pro-religious commentary, often only along the 
lines of a particular religion.  
 
 GD> I've told you before, this is not a debate Echo.  It never was nor can it
 GD> ever be.  It is a place where fundy beliefs are BBQ'd right before their
 GD> eyes over the fires of facts.

 RC> and I told you that this will be a debate echo.

It'll never happen, as all you will accomplish is silencing all 
criticism of anything religious. That process is already underway.  


 RC>> There comes a point when Mr Sauer does not get nor deserves special
 RC>> protections for the stuff he unleashes himself, unto himself. For me

 GD> That's the biggest red herring I've seen yet.

 RC> If it doesnt comport with your agenda, everything is a red herring.

No, Cassell, what you threw in is a Red Herring.  It's not about special 
treatment for him.  

 RC> God Dan isnt your real name, Otto is his real name, your indignance is
 RC> ridiculous. 

He goes by 'Ross'.  You've ruled on that before. 

 RC> I have not ruled against it in here or in MATZDOBRE... I shall not
 RC> rule against it as long as I dont have a real names only rule. 

Of course you don't have it in MATZDOBRE.  The Echo was puposely 
designed to belittle a couple of people. I wonder what FIDO policy 
has to say about that... 

 GD> It's not a "Protection of Sauer."  It's the proper thing to do.  That you
 GD> call it the "Otto Rule" shows your contempt rather than true concern over
 GD> abuse of an Echo member's personal name.

 RC> I find no abuse in using the name someone was given by his parents, he
 RC> has been an adult for 30 years and has had ample time to have had it
 RC> changed legally. 

Continued usage and acceptance of another name is often sufficient, at 
least for first names. I know at least 3 people who's real first name is 
not what the use in public and pvt transactions. 

 RC> The rule I refer to as the Otto Rule in the crossfire echo, is named
 RC> after him because of his protests. Which isnt any different from

And widdle Timmy didn't get upset?  Hell, he cried the loudest.  

It's obvious to one and all that he does not use "Otto".  That name is 
used by others just for annoyance.  You calling it the "Otto Rule" is 
just another example of the practice.  



... Just who are you really?  John Brawley on a bad acid trip?
--- OMX/Blue Wave/DOS v2.30
 * Origin: Soundly on the Fault Line (1:138/666.0)