Text 407, 84 rader
Skriven 2006-11-18 09:28:52 av JOHNJWILSON (1:123/140)
     Kommentar till en text av MATT CLARK
Ärende: SAME OL' LEFTWING STORY
===============================
-> >
 
-> Then along comes some reporter 'on a mission', AFTER the fact, with
-> his/her mind already made up, making claims without a clue about what
-> had happened before they arrived at the scene.   And of course the
-> 'innocent civilians' are always going to feed them an earful, and should
-> they see a dead child lying near by..  SHAZAM! ...they believe
everything 
-> they have to say.  Left-witted idiots.

Still undecided as to your political leanings, eh? :-)

 
-> MC>   The only way that many innocent people can get 
-> MC>   killed is if we were carpet bombing towns 
-> MC>   and cities.  We're not.
-> 
-> JW>   And you're sure?
-> 
-> If we were then the left-witted reporters would be all over it...

So NOW you're depending on them telling the truth!


...but yeah, I think you are correct. The real numbers depend on a lot of
things, and keeping count is not priority one. 
so
-
Ya know, I can't, in my head, distinguish the difference
between 100,000 and 600,000. My brain just says "big number" to both.

Same with computers. I had an 8k PET, I now have a 256MB,
Hard drives are in terra bytes now....
my slow machine is 1GHz...
one thousand million cycles. Every second. My head hurts.
 
-> 
-> MC>  And has anyone asked about the number of 
-> MC>  'guilty' civilians killed?
-> 
-> JW>  And regular murders? And accidental deaths? 
-> JW>  From disease...etc...
-> 
-> All counted as 'innocent civilians' killed by the US no doubt.
-> 
-> 
-> 
-> MC>   Know of 'any' reports from the mainstream media 
-> MC>   that covers that number?   ANY AT ALL??  Of course not!!
-> MC>   That show's you right there that the spoiled brats 
-> MC>   running around, who call themselves 'journalists',
-> MC>   have an acute bias and/or an agenda to fulfill.
-> 
-> JW>   I've read a quiet mention in a few places about 
-> JW>   the strange quietitude. You'd have to be a 
-> JW>   conspiracy theory person though to think the
-> JW>   Administration would not like the news out? 
-> JW>   Right before and election?
-> 
-> They don't control the media.  If the gov' had control we'd hear nothing 
-> but 'rosey' reports about Iraq.  The reality is the bulk of reports only 
-> cover the bad and give very little mention about the good. Ask any
soldier.
-> Their stories are also largely ignored.
-> 
-> 
-> 
-> JW>   It'll be interesting to see if Lancet's number have ANY
-> JW>   justification, answering your questions would be a 
-> JW>   good first step...
-> 
-> Yes it would.  But don't hold your breath.
-> 
-> 
-> MC>    Meddling liars and dirt bags.
-> 
-> JW>   I'm putting you down as "Undecided"...:-)
-> 
->   :-))))
-> 
-> 
-> 
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5
 * Origin: Try Our Web Based QWK: DOCSPLACE.ORG (1:123/140)