Text 413, 96 rader
Skriven 2006-11-18 15:08:12 av MATT CLARK (1:123/140)
     Kommentar till en text av JOHNJWILSON
Ärende: SAME OL' LEFTWING STORY
===============================
> 
>  

MC> Then along comes some reporter 'on a mission', AFTER the fact, with
  > his/her mind already made up, making claims without a clue about what
  > had happened before they arrived at the scene.   And of course the
  > 'innocent civilians' are always going to feed them an earful, and
should
  > they see a dead child lying near by..  SHAZAM! ...they believe
  > everything  they have to say.  Left-witted idiots.
 
-> Still undecided as to your political leanings, eh? :-)


-> 
->  
-> -> MC>   The only way that many innocent people can get 
-> -> MC>   killed is if we were carpet bombing towns 
-> -> MC>   and cities.  We're not.
-> -> 
-> -> JW>   And you're sure?
-> -> 
-> -> If we were then the left-witted reporters would be all over it...
-> 
-> So NOW you're depending on them telling the truth!

Are you kidding?????


-> 
-> 
-> ...but yeah, I think you are correct. The real numbers depend on a lot
of
-> things, and keeping count is not priority one. 
-> so
-> -
-> Ya know, I can't, in my head, distinguish the difference
-> between 100,000 and 600,000. My brain just says "big number" to both.

Well if 100,000 is big, then 600,000 is six times a s big.

-> -> 
-> -> MC>  And has anyone asked about the number of 
-> -> MC>  'guilty' civilians killed?
-> -> 
-> -> JW>  And regular murders? And accidental deaths? 
-> -> JW>  From disease...etc...
-> -> 
-> -> All counted as 'innocent civilians' killed by the US no doubt.

 
 
 
MC>   Know of 'any' reports from the mainstream media 
MC>   that covers that number?   ANY AT ALL??  Of course not!!
MC>   That show's you right there that the spoiled brats 
MC>   running around, who call themselves 'journalists',
MC>   have an acute bias and/or an agenda to fulfill.
 
JW>   I've read a quiet mention in a few places about 
JW>   the strange quietitude. You'd have to be a 
JW>   conspiracy theory person though to think the
JW>   Administration would not like the news out? 
JW>   Right before and election?
 
MC>   They don't control the media.  If the gov' had control 
MC>   we'd hear nothing but 'rosey' reports about Iraq.  
MC>   The reality is the bulk of reports only cover the bad 
MC>   and give very little mention about the good. 
MC>   Ask any soldier.  Their stories are also largely ignored.


 
 
 
JW>   It'll be interesting to see if Lancet's number have ANY
JW>   justification, answering your questions would be a 
JW>   good first step...
 
MC>   Yes it would.  But don't hold your breath.
 
 


MC>    Meddling liars and dirt bags.
 
JW>   I'm putting you down as "Undecided"...:-)
 
MC>   :-))))



-> -> 
-> -> 
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5
 * Origin: Try Our Web Based QWK: DOCSPLACE.ORG (1:123/140)