Text 5179, 206 rader
Skriven 2009-04-24 00:23:44 av Ed Hulett (1:123/789.0)
   Kommentar till text 5175 av Ross Sauer (1:123/789.0)
Ärende: COGNITIVE DIFFICULTY.....
=================================
Ross Sauer -> Ed Hulett wrote:
 RS> "Ed Hulett -> Ross Sauer" <1:123/789.0> wrote in
 RS> news:9263$HOLYSMOKE@JamNNTPd:

 EH>>>> That is a lie. The extreme left is comprised of people like
 EH>>   you.

 RS>>> BULL-SHIT.

 EH>> You are in denial.

 RS> I've never been to Egypt.

You also resemble an idiot.

 RS>>>>> As to "eradicating religion," among progressives, that's a
 EH>>   damn EH>>   lie.

 EH>>>> Hahahahahahahaha!!!!!

 EH>>>> Have you read some of the atheist sites on the web?

 RS>>> Fine. Show me.

 EH>> Just read some of the atheist sites.

 RS> Like I said, SHOW ME.

Are you unable to use Google? I know you are always searching for KITTEH!.

 RS> Unless you're too stupid to do so.

Do you not understand plain English?

 RS>>>>> It's the theocratic right-wing Christians that want our
 EH>>>>   government to keep RS> on shoving mandatory Christian rites
 EH>>   among EH>>   everyone.

 EH>>>> That is nonsense.

 RS>>> Again, BULL-SHIT.

 EH>> Just like the rest of the extreme left, you think that including
 EH>> alternatives to the theory of evolution is "shoving Christian
 EH>> mandatory rites among everyone" (sic).

 RS> You have no idea what is the "extreme left."

Yes, I do and you fit right in.

 RS> Here they are, stupid.
 RS> http://www.cpusa.org/

Those are the fringe. You are the extreme left.

 RS> If you continue to whine about your imaginary "extreme left," no wonder
 RS> you joined your cult.

Hahahahahahahahahaha!!!!

Are you trying to unseat Ceppa as the most stupid person in FIDO?

 RS>>>>> One example: Mandating the Pledge of Allegiance in schools, as
 EH>>>>   it is now. RS> With that "under God" in it, that was stuck
 EH>>   into it EH>>   during McCarthyism in RS> 1954.

 EH>>>> Blah blah blah...

 RS>>> Is this a fact, or not?

 EH>> No one is mandating the pledge. "[U]nder Gad" is a part of the pledge
 EH>> now and will remain so. It makes you look foolish to continue whining
 EH>> about it.

 RS> BUllSHIT.
 RS> http://www.politicalbase.com/issues/mandatory-pledge-of-allegiance/31/

You dig up some fringe group with a website? Now try to use Google for
something constructive.

 RS>>>>> Don't forget groups that continue to try to shove their
 EH>>>>   religious dogma RS> into science classrooms, even though they
 EH>>   have EH>>   jack shit to actually back RS> up their suppositions.

 EH>>>> Like I said, you people want to eradicate religion from
 EH>>   society. You EH>> keep pointing to Jefferson's comment in a letter
 EH>>   to a Baptist minister EH>> where he talked of a "wall of separation"
 EH>>   between church and state as EH>> if it was stated as such in the
 EH>>   Bill of Rights.

 RS>>> Fine. *WHICH* religion you want in our government, which is what
 RS>>> Jefferson was addressing in that letter?

 EH>> Good grief, you do go on about some silly things. I support the First
 EH>> Amendment -- "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment
 EH>> of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise there of;..."

 RS> Quit running away from your whines.

You have literally worn that term out. I'm not running from anything. I gave
you an answer to you question.

 RS>>> If the loudest religion in government pushers had their way,
 EH>>   *YOUR* RS> religion would be illegal.

 EH>> You don't know what you are talking about. No religion, other than
 EH>> Islam, wants theocratic control of government.

 EH>>>> What you people keep ignoring is that the real language in the
 EH>>   First EH>> Amendment states something entirely different. "Congress
 EH>>   shall make EH>> not law respecting the establishment of religion, or
 EH>>   prohibiting the EH>> free exercise thereof;...

 RS>>> And this means as the Supreme Court keeps stating, over and over
 EH>>   and RS> over is that our government is *NEUTRAL* regarding religion.

 EH>> Exactly!

 RS> And you theocrats continue to run to the courts.

Huh? When have I or the LDS Church ran to the courts WRT the First Amendment?

 EH>>>> You people want to prohibit the free exercise of religion
 EH>>   wherever you EH>> find it.

 RS>>> That is simply a damn lie, pushed by theocrats.

 EH>> No, it is not. It's the truth.

 RS> In your conservafairyland.

Grow up.

 RS>>> Tell you what.
 RS>>> You have a public park you walk/drive past on a regular basis?

 EH>> Yes.

 RS>>> Suppose one day you see a monument having been erected there,
 EH>>   glorifying RS> Islam, complete with loudspeakers gving a call to
 EH>>   prayer several times a RS> day.

 EH>> Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!

 EH>> Do they have mosques in Wisconsin that have loud speakers giving the
 EH>> call to prayer? To my knowledge that only happens in majority Muslim
 EH>> countries.

 RS> No.

Then what's with the silly question?

 EH>> The closest Islamic congregational building from here is about 4 miles
 EH>> away. It's also very small.

 RS> Want a bigger one?

I couldn't care less as long as it's on their own property.
 .
 RS>>> Would you just ignore it? Fat chance.

 EH>> A loud speaker calling to prayer is different than an innocuous Ten
 EH>> Commandments on display in a court of law.

 RS> Because all of them are against the Constitution.

No, they are not. The display of the Ten Commandments is not unconstitutional.

 RS>>> So why should you ditwit "Christian" theocrats be allowed to
 EH>>   stick your RS> Christian crap in any public area?

 EH>> Why shouldn't we? What bother is it to you to have to walk by a
 EH>> display of the "Ten Commandments" on your way into court?

 RS> Because it's religious bigotry. PERIOD.

Yes, you display religious bigotry all the time.

 RS>>> Look up Roy Moore, then get back to me.

 EH>> Why should I? You want to make a point, make it!

 RS> Look it up, that is, if you're not too stupid to do so.

Right after you look up the various atheist sites that want to get rid of any
semblance of religion.

 RS> FTB cultist.

Oh my, you really told me, did you.

Ed

-- 
"The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is
to fill the world with fools." --Herbert Spencer

"The principle of spending money to be paid by posterity, under
the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale."
 --Thomas Jefferson

Linux User# 416016
Linux Machine# 379711

--- Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105)
 * Origin: Fidonet Via Newsreader - http://www.easternstar.info (1:123/789.0)