Text 5554, 66 rader
Skriven 2009-04-29 01:57:45 av Dan Ceppa (1:138/666.0)
     Kommentar till en text av Jeff Binkley
Ärende: A FUNDY PAIL FULL OF SHIT
=================================
-> On 28 Apr 09  15:47:00, Jeff Binkley got back to Dan Ceppa 
-> Re: A FUNDY PAIL FULL OF SHIT

 DC> DC>Like hell you do.  You know you can't produce the evidence.
 DC> DC>That's why  you made than lame attempt to pawn you role off on
 DC> DC>me.  It's not working. Your "logic" isn't.
 
 DC> JB> I never claimed I was going to provide you evidence.  I simply
 DC> JB> do not  believe you.  I am not sure why you are having such a
 DC> JB> difficult time  understanding this.  
 DC> 
 DC>It doesn't matter if you believe me or not, Jeff.  

 JB> It does to me.  It may not to you.  That is your issue to deal with.
 
Wrong. Jeff.  Once again you try to dkvert your need to provide evidence 
for the negative.  One of these days, you'll understand why.  
 
 DC>The fact is that I've got your promissory note and you can't prove 
 DC>that I don't. 

 JB> I don't care whether you do or not.  You are welcome to keep it, frame
 JB> it and hang it on the wall.  I don't care.  

That's right, Jeff, pretend that:  

A: You never stated that you could prove a negative.
B: Proved that negative and claim victory.  

 DC>That only means that you are being obstinate.  It still doesn't prove
 DC>I don't have that note. 

 JB> It means I don't believe you.  We've been over this how many times
 JB> now,  5 or 6 ? 

Yep, and you still haven't gotten it.  

 DC>It's your comprehension that is a fault.  Try as much as you like,
 DC>but you  cannot prove I don't have the document.  All you have done
 DC>so far is  to refuse to pay.  

 JB> I am not trying to prove that you have the document or not.  As soon

Yes, you are.  

 DC>Jeff, you are the one who has clained to not be able to prove a
 DC>negative  but have done so.  You still haven't peovwn that I don't

 JB> You lie again.  I made no such claim in this entire discussion thread.
 JB> I demand you show where I made such a claim.  You can't.  
 
You asked me to provide the proof, Jeff.  You know, that proof you get.  


 JB> limits.  It tears at the heart of your extremist arguments but I don't
 JB> expect you or your pup to recognize it.  Neither of you have shown any
 JB> understanding of basic mathematics and logic.

What extremist argument?  Proving a negative is easy for you.  You 
stated just in the past.  Have you forgotten how to do it already?  



... "Hey, don't look at that man behind that curtain!" -- OZ
--- OMX/Blue Wave/DOS v2.30
 * Origin: Soundly on the Fault Line (1:138/666.0)