Text 597, 180 rader
Skriven 2007-02-06 03:43:00 av WAYNE CHIRNSIDE (1:123/140)
     Kommentar till en text av OLEG DOLGIKH
Ärende: Re: Hell?
=================
-=> OLEG DOLGIKH wrote to WAYNE CHIRNSIDE <=-

 OD> Hello WAYNE.

 OD> 05 Feb 07 21:20, you wrote to me:


 OD>> Read something on the history of witch hunts. It started as a big
 OD>> ugly hoax, but ended up with real witches sacrificing real babies
 OD>> to the devil.

 WC> Hey ignorant guy.
 WC> I'm from Marblehead Massachussetts.

 OD> So? It automatically makes you an expert? I don't think so.

Have you read the Salem MA. town archives of the rye ergot
infestation that blighted Salem those years?
I have.
Seen the PBS documentary of same and of similar instances
in Europe as well as more contempary  accounts in Italy the
later involving hallucinations and deaths???

 WC> Right next to Salem Massachussetts of Witch hanging fame.

 OD> So you do come from a stupid part of a stupid country. What were you so
 OD> proud of again?

The stupid part of the country from which sprung Paul Revere. General
George C. Patton, Thomas Paine.
Marblehead, birthplace of the American Navy - U.S.S. Hannah.
General George Glover , Vice President Gerry, The Boston Tea Party
and American Independence from the British.
Plymouth Rock whereupon the settlers disembarked from the Mayflower.

Just off the top of my head.
I can look up thousands of more pages of historical
U.S. Background if you like?
Oh, the U.S.S. Constitution docked in Boston, Bunker Hill.... 

 WC> What's your evidence for "real witches?"

 OD> Are you daft? They sacrificed babies to the devil! 

So didn't the Indians of Central and South American.
U.S. Army cavalry troops distributed smallpox infected blankets to 
native Americans.
Manifest Destiny was pursued in the name of God.
The Crusades.
Iraq II.
So what.
All acts of men.
People.
People being those things manifestly real.

I dont know if it
 OD> worked or not, most likely not, but they fucking sacrificed fucking
 OD> babies to the fucking devil, that's "real witch" in my book.

What use would you have for a book?
I cannot for a moment believe you capable of reading with comprehension.

 WC> Rye ergot is the latest explaination for those reports from Salem and
 WC> Europe.

 OD> Yeah, modern science can tell us an exact kind of crop failures we had
 OD> several centuries ago. 

IDIOT.
Albert Hoffman - Swiss scientist at Roche Phamacuticals
Discoverer of Lysergic Acid Di-ethylidamide.
LSD.
Rye ergot is the precursor chemical in it's synthesis.
Modern experiments have demonstrated ergot in rye converted to LSD
in the bread baking process.
Thus hallucinations and belief in the supernatural, ghosts. hobgoblins
and Gods and other stupid nonsense to keep those like you ignorant 
weak and powerless.
Religion is the opiate of the masses.


Not. This kind of "explaination" is even more
 OD> full of shit than "witch did it" theory.


 WC> You have an awful lot of beliefs for a rational person don't you?

 OD> Unlike you, i don't pose as a 100%-percent rational guy.

 
You're ignorant.
Willfully ignorant.
People the world over die needlessly for the likes of you.

 OD> RS>>> Bullshit. Pure, unadulterated, bullshit.

 WC> Yeah, every word you wrote.

 OD> You wish =)

Wishing has no foundation in reality.
Wish all you like but naught will come of it.


 OD>>> The same stuff they told people about not killing and not
 OD>>> stealing and whatnot. Bullshit too?

Killing is manifestly real.
Stealing is manifestly real.
Spooks, Santa, Batman and Gods are not.

 WC> Piles and piles of this effluent flows copiously from your blowhole

 OD> Ok, ok, i get it, you know how this shitting shit out of your
 OD> full-of-shit shit of a body business works. 


Big deal, you've a dictionary and proved you can lookup
effluent.
It spews from you effortlessly and prodigiously.

Can we please get back to
 OD> how abysmally wrong and arrogant you are?

Sure.
What would you care to know about me?

Care to point out anything wrong I've said?
Demonstrably wrong that is?
With substanative support for any such contention? 

 OD> RS>>> Unless you can actually show some clear evidence
 OD> RS>>> otherwise...

 OD>>> Don't worry, you'll get plenty of evidence in time =)

 WC> There is no time, it's a human convention to measure entropy you
 WC> silly.

 OD> So, in one sentence you claimed physical phenomena does not exist AND
 OD> gave said phenomena's kinda physical definition? God you are stupid.

Time has substance?
Gads it is you that is woefully ignorant.
What is the substance of time?
How many protons?
Quarks or bosons.
What's the atomic weight of time?

Entropy is a physical phenominon, not time.
Time is a concept.

 OD> All that to show you know the word 'entropy'? Probably have a knowing
 OD> of nukular fishun too.

I like fishing ( correct spelling of fishing to the left)
Fresh water Bass and salt water Sea Bass, Grouper, snook, flounder 
and other kinds of fish.

Rutherford knew something iof nuclear *fission*

 OD> Time is not a measure of entropy, if you must know. saying this is like
 OD> saying space is a measure of size.

Gads, you're far more ignorant than most who dare enter here!
Time IS a manmade concept describing entropy.

Entropy is disorder, heat death, a law of thermodynamics 
that is imminently provable, reliably repeatably provable
and a physical phenominon that occurs over time with
time merely being that human convention employed to describe it.

You're just another fool.

... It is the best of all possible worlds said Dr. Pangloss to Candide
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ give it a read sometime.
Next to you Dr. Pangloss is a super genius.

--- MultiMail/Linux v0.47
 * Origin: Doc's Place BBS Fido Since 1991 docsplace.tzo.com (1:123/140)