Text 6323, 159 rader
Skriven 2009-05-15 20:53:28 av JOHNJWILSON (1:123/140)
     Kommentar till en text av ED HULETT
Ärende: Hello!
==============
-> I, for instance, have an entire life separate of this echo. I have many
things
-> that I can stay busy doing. With the attack dog gone for however long he
-> decides, I am able to forget this silly place.

Ah. So that's what kept you here. 

Opposite particles clash and become non-existent. :-)

 
->  TR> I can't help but notice neither you or your hateful friend have
said one
->  TR> single word against Islam of any note, even since the day of 9/11.

9/11 didn't cause me to 'hate Islam' Or Iranians, Iraqi's ...it did cause
me to ponder what it would be like to have a life with no hope for any
future and being convinced that suicide was a holy act lavishly rewarded.
Damn! A lot of minds are taught that, believe that, will act on that. It
seems that nowhere can you be where being lied to is out of fashion. Plato
thought it was necessary 'the noble lie'... A memorable quote from Soren
Kierkegaard "Language is the art of concealing thought." Take THAT, media!
:-)

-> Well, there's that thing about tolerance and diversity they keep going
on
-> about. Although, I haven't witnessed either WRT Christianity.

2 points there for Mormons. 
-> 

->  TR> radical religion, it is a mind-set that calls for the death and.or
-> destruction
->  TR> of anyone who does not convert to its backward, repressive tenets,
you
->  TR> immediately start screaming `intolerance! Bigotry!'

For scores of years Muslims, Jews and Christians have lived peacefully,
side by side...(e.g., Turkey, Spain) A time of  different commerce, power,
greed, politics...
-> 
-> There's that tolerance and diversity thing again. Only for thee and not
for me
-> and all that.

-> 
->  TR> But.........(aside: get ready folks) if the 19 hijackers had all
been
-> radical
->  TR> *Christians*....

..and the religious fanatics who plant car bombs in public
->  TR> market areas and kill sometimes dozens of innocent people in one
single
->  TR> event.....you people would be screaming for blood!

Kinda hard to be angry at the people of Jonestown.
-> 
-> Bingo.

Unbingo.
-> 
->  TR> You say nothing about religious radicals who set up rocket and
mortar
-> launch
->  TR> sites inside civilian homes, in residential areas, and launch those
-> rockets
->  TR> and mortars at civilian and military targets without regard to
which is
->  TR> which.
-> 
-> They are just "defending" themselves.

If you believe that non-Muslims are infidels with no souls - and of no
worth to Allah whatever, killing them causes no regret whatever. If it
results in hatred to them so much the better; so much more reason to
kill...
-> 
->  TR> Yet, you scream for a president's or a secretary of defense's head
if a
-> U.S.
->  TR> military attack on a known terrorist launch site happens to kill a
few
-> civilians.
-> 
-> Another bingo.

Another unBingo.
A wild exaggeration to make an exaggerated point. 

**************
->
(Limbaugh, Falwell) 
 
-> Their mere existence is enough for the Sauers of the world to cheer
their
-> death.
->
Their power and influence is slightly scary. But, hey, there's always
someone if you want to spend your time looking for scary :-)
 
 
-> That would require consistency from Sauer and his ilk.

"A foolish consistency is the hob-goblin of small minds."  Emerson

-> 
->  TR> You and your butt buddy come in here and revile someone because
they
-> belong to
->  TR> the Mormon Church, but say not a word about those who are real
religious
->  TR> fanatics, and deliberate murderers besides.


-> 
-> Well, you know how dangerous I am.

And you work with what you've got. There being a noted absence of fanatic
deliberate murders on line, it's "Pick on Mormon's Month"! I hope you
picked up that serious laud of Atheists...by a Mormom. I gave the URK a few
posts back... 
-> 

->  TR> Your credibility as a `religion' critic, along with your butt
buddy, is
-> non-
->  TR> existent!...

Well, as a working atheist, that would automatically become a religion
critic. I know a very intelligent man who sees no worth at all in Dali,
Picasso, etc...he's an art critic and a very poor one.  

 You are fakes (not to coin a phrase).....both of you. Your
-> entire
->  TR> purpose in this echo is to insult, belittle, and revile.

True! How else to show superiority but by finding fault? (I have only one
fault: excessive modesty...) There's no desire to convince or even argue
but to show, by finding human error, to prove their moral/intellectual
superiority.    
Being a master poet, of course MY feelings of such is justified.
Ahem (With apologies to Walter Savage Landor)

I strive with none for none are worth of my strife.
Science I loved and next to science, Art
I warmed my hands on the fires of life
They sink but I'm not quite ready to depart.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^


Ah, Wilson, you've done it AGAIN (Preen)





--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5
 * Origin: Doc's Place BBS Fido Since 1991 docsplace.tzo.com (1:123/140)