Text 6750, 68 rader
Skriven 2014-02-25 10:00:00 av TIM RICHARDSON (1:123/140)
     Kommentar till en text av MATT MUNSON
Ärende: Arizona discrimination
==============================
On 02-24-14, MATT MUNSON said to ALL:


MM>Because people got offended that they were required to bake cakes for same
MM>sex couples, states are now making discrimination legal where you can
MM>decline to serve people in your business based on religious purposes. Do
MM>most of you think this is a real dangerous idea?


There is a stopper to all this controversy that has been active since I was a
very young man.


In many places of businesses there used to be a sign in plain view that said
in large letters:


WE RESERVE THE RIGHT TO REFUSE SERVICE TO ANYONE!!


No need for court cases, lawyers, hurt feelings, or controversy. It has always
been a business proprietor's option to control their own business, and were
allowed to decide with whom and under what circumstances they do business
with. Until the homosexuals came along.


It doesn't strike anyone weird that, a sex offender comes out of prison and
society can limit `where' that person lives, `where' that person goes,
merchants refusing to have them on their premises? Even though they have in
most cases served the sentence laid on them as punishment for whatever they
did, society can treat them that way and there is no hue and cry over it?

Yet, a small, sex-degenerate segment of our society, a segment that transmits
some of the most deadly STD's in our population, a segment that has succeeded
in perverting the institution of marriage with their filth, is suddenly
entitled to a wedding cake, whether the baker wants to bake it for them or
not?


The only difference between a convicted sex offender and a homosexual is, the
sex offender is required to register.


BTW....there are homosexual beauty salons, homosexual botiques, homosexual
interior decorators, homosexual tailors, etc etc...the list is endless.


There is bound to be a homosexual bakery out there somewhere that these people
can get their stupid-ass wedding cake from.


The only reason the homosexuals involved in that particular instance are
pressing it, is to `get in yer face' with their degeneracy. If they can force
someone to make them a wedding cake, what makes you think they could be
prevented from forcing `mandated' instruction in homosexual practices on one
of your children or grandchildren in a public venue? Ever think of that?


Not many people have. Teaching our children that a perverted, desease-causing
activity like `homosexuality' comes under the blanket of `diversity', or
`equal rights', puts our future on a dark path. One day people will wake up
and regret their support of such degeneracy.



---
*Durango b301 #PE* 
 * Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 Join Us: www.DocsPlace.org (1:123/140)