Tillbaka till svenska Fidonet
English   Information   Debug  
FNEWS_PUBLISH   4393
FN_SYSOP   41678
FN_SYSOP_OLD1   71952
FTP_FIDO   0/2
FTSC_PUBLIC   0/13598
FUNNY   0/4886
GENEALOGY.EUR   0/71
GET_INFO   105
GOLDED   0/408
HAM   0/16069
HOLYSMOKE   6322/6791
HOT_SITES   0/1
HTMLEDIT   0/71
HUB203   466
HUB_100   264
HUB_400   39
HUMOR   0/29
IC   0/2851
INTERNET   0/424
INTERUSER   0/3
IP_CONNECT   719
JAMNNTPD   0/233
JAMTLAND   0/47
KATTY_KORNER   0/41
LAN   0/16
LINUX-USER   0/19
LINUXHELP   0/1155
LINUX   0/22090
LINUX_BBS   0/957
mail   18.68
mail_fore_ok   249
MENSA   0/341
MODERATOR   0/102
MONTE   0/992
MOSCOW_OKLAHOMA   0/1245
MUFFIN   0/783
MUSIC   0/321
N203_STAT   924
N203_SYSCHAT   313
NET203   321
NET204   69
NET_DEV   0/10
NORD.ADMIN   0/101
NORD.CHAT   0/2572
NORD.FIDONET   189
NORD.HARDWARE   0/28
NORD.KULTUR   0/114
NORD.PROG   0/32
NORD.SOFTWARE   0/88
NORD.TEKNIK   0/58
NORD   0/453
OCCULT_CHAT   0/93
OS2BBS   0/787
OS2DOSBBS   0/580
OS2HW   0/42
OS2INET   0/37
OS2LAN   0/134
OS2PROG   0/36
OS2REXX   0/113
OS2USER-L   207
OS2   0/4786
OSDEBATE   0/18996
PASCAL   0/490
PERL   0/457
PHP   0/45
POINTS   0/405
POLITICS   0/29554
POL_INC   0/14731
PSION   103
R20_ADMIN   1121
R20_AMATORRADIO   0/2
R20_BEST_OF_FIDONET   13
R20_CHAT   0/893
R20_DEPP   0/3
R20_DEV   399
R20_ECHO2   1379
R20_ECHOPRES   0/35
R20_ESTAT   0/719
R20_FIDONETPROG...
...RAM.MYPOINT
  0/2
R20_FIDONETPROGRAM   0/22
R20_FIDONET   0/248
R20_FILEFIND   0/24
R20_FILEFOUND   0/22
R20_HIFI   0/3
R20_INFO2   3206
R20_INTERNET   0/12940
R20_INTRESSE   0/60
R20_INTR_KOM   0/99
R20_KANDIDAT.CHAT   42
R20_KANDIDAT   28
R20_KOM_DEV   112
R20_KONTROLL   0/13259
R20_KORSET   0/18
R20_LOKALTRAFIK   0/24
R20_MODERATOR   0/1852
R20_NC   76
R20_NET200   245
R20_NETWORK.OTH...
...ERNETS
  0/13
R20_OPERATIVSYS...
...TEM.LINUX
  0/44
R20_PROGRAMVAROR   0/1
R20_REC2NEC   534
R20_SFOSM   0/340
R20_SF   0/108
R20_SPRAK.ENGLISH   0/1
R20_SQUISH   107
R20_TEST   2
R20_WORST_OF_FIDONET   12
RAR   0/9
RA_MULTI   106
RA_UTIL   0/162
REGCON.EUR   0/2056
REGCON   0/13
SCIENCE   0/1206
SF   0/239
SHAREWARE_SUPPORT   0/5146
SHAREWRE   0/14
SIMPSONS   0/169
STATS_OLD1   0/2539.065
STATS_OLD2   0/2530
STATS_OLD3   708/2395.095
STATS_OLD4   0/1692.25
SURVIVOR   0/495
SYSOPS_CORNER   0/3
SYSOP   0/84
TAGLINES   0/112
TEAMOS2   0/4530
TECH   0/2617
TEST.444   0/105
TRAPDOOR   0/19
TREK   0/755
TUB   0/290
UFO   0/40
UNIX   0/1316
USA_EURLINK   0/102
USR_MODEMS   0/1
VATICAN   0/2740
VIETNAM_VETS   0/14
VIRUS   0/378
VIRUS_INFO   0/201
VISUAL_BASIC   0/473
WHITEHOUSE   0/5187
WIN2000   0/101
WIN32   0/30
WIN95   0/4288
WIN95_OLD1   0/70272
WINDOWS   0/1517
WWB_SYSOP   0/419
WWB_TECH   0/810
ZCC-PUBLIC   0/1
ZEC   4

 
4DOS   0/134
ABORTION   0/7
ALASKA_CHAT   0/506
ALLFIX_FILE   0/1313
ALLFIX_FILE_OLD1   0/7997
ALT_DOS   0/152
AMATEUR_RADIO   0/1039
AMIGASALE   0/14
AMIGA   0/331
AMIGA_INT   0/1
AMIGA_PROG   0/20
AMIGA_SYSOP   0/26
ANIME   0/15
ARGUS   0/924
ASCII_ART   0/340
ASIAN_LINK   0/651
ASTRONOMY   0/417
AUDIO   0/92
AUTOMOBILE_RACING   0/105
BABYLON5   0/17862
BAG   135
BATPOWER   0/361
BBBS.ENGLISH   0/382
BBSLAW   0/109
BBS_ADS   0/5290
BBS_INTERNET   0/507
BIBLE   0/3563
BINKD   0/1119
BINKLEY   0/215
BLUEWAVE   0/2173
CABLE_MODEMS   0/25
CBM   0/46
CDRECORD   0/66
CDROM   0/20
CLASSIC_COMPUTER   0/378
COMICS   0/15
CONSPRCY   0/899
COOKING   32689
COOKING_OLD1   0/24719
COOKING_OLD2   0/40862
COOKING_OLD3   0/37489
COOKING_OLD4   0/35496
COOKING_OLD5   9370
C_ECHO   0/189
C_PLUSPLUS   0/31
DIRTY_DOZEN   0/201
DOORGAMES   0/2053
DOS_INTERNET   0/196
duplikat   6002
ECHOLIST   0/18295
EC_SUPPORT   0/318
ELECTRONICS   0/359
ELEKTRONIK.GER   1534
ENET.LINGUISTIC   0/13
ENET.POLITICS   0/4
ENET.SOFT   0/11701
ENET.SYSOP   33888
ENET.TALKS   0/32
ENGLISH_TUTOR   0/2000
EVOLUTION   0/1335
FDECHO   0/217
FDN_ANNOUNCE   0/7068
FIDONEWS   24099
FIDONEWS_OLD1   0/49742
FIDONEWS_OLD2   0/35949
FIDONEWS_OLD3   0/30874
FIDONEWS_OLD4   0/37224
FIDO_SYSOP   12852
FIDO_UTIL   0/180
FILEFIND   0/209
FILEGATE   0/212
FILM   0/18
Möte HOLYSMOKE, 6791 texter
 lista första sista föregående nästa
Text 6771, 146 rader
Skriven 2014-03-08 10:22:00 av TIM RICHARDSON (1:123/140)
     Kommentar till en text av EARL CROASMUN
Ärende: Arizona discrimination
==============================
EC>Not really the baker's concern as to whether a wedding is "necessary" or
EC>not.


Firstly, where it is NOT the baker's concern about the `wedding', it IS the
baker's concern about what he's seen as becoming part and parcel to.


Sodomy, and same-sex `weddings' between two sodomites BECOMES his concern when
two same-sex sodomites walk into his place of business and try to make HIM a
party to it all against his strongly-held Christian beliefs.


THEN it certainly becomes the bakers' concern.


EC>Otherwise the act that you consider immoral is going to take
EC>place, with or >> without a cake, with or without a wedding, with or
EC>without any marriage of any type.


Secondly, what *I* consider immoral isn't any part of this discussion.


We are talking about a *Christian* baker, who has strongly-held Christian
beliefs, who refuses to be any part of what they KNOW to be a sodomite
relationship.


And before you come back with the `celibacy' argument, I must inform you that
the notion of `marriage' between two people (whatever their sex) isn't
typically about `celibacy'. that would be a VERY rare instance. The very term
`marriage' between two people carries the `physical' side of the intended
relationship in an implicit, usually-unspoken manner. But its there, and
everyone knows it.


So leave the `celibacy' stuff out of it. This is a `homosexual' relationship,
and `sodomy' is involved.


EC>Looked up the Colorado case.  Some interesting details.  First, same-sex
EC>marriage was not recognized in Colorado.  As far as the baker was
EC>concerned, it was not a "marriage" at all.


So then...what's the court case all about?


EC>Second, they had ALREADY gotten married in Massachusetts, where it was
EC>legally recognized.  This was a cake to celebrate the Mass. wedding well
EC>AFTER the fact.  The baker could not have possibly been a participant in
EC>the marriage in any way, since it had ALREADY HAPPENED before the two men


So then, in other words, `sodomy' was already involved (pretending that these
two same-sex sodomites were both `virgins' before this sham wedding in MASS
took place).


Then why (pray tell) come all the way out to this city in Colorado, to THIS
bakery, and do a court case for being refused a `wedding' cake celibrating a
sodomy-relationship between two same-sex sodomites?


This whole thing begins to smack of a put-up job.


EC>Third, the baker testified that he would have refused
EC>to bake a cake regardless of whether it was a "wedding" or a "commitment
EC>ceremony" or a "civil union" ceremony (same-sex civil unions were
EC>recognized in Colorado.


And rightly so. Scripture in the bible is very specific and clear on this
matter. A God-fearing, righteous man does not even allow the appearance of
evil to enter into their life. That is taught in several places in the bible.


First Thesalonians, chapter 5, verses 15 through 22 (I won't quote them all,
just the relevant ones):


15: See that none render evil for evil unto any man; but ever follow that
which is good, both among yourselves and to all men.

21: Prove all things; hold fast that which is good.

22: Abstain from all appearance of evil.

1st Peter, chapter 3, verse 11:

11: Let him eschew evil and do good;


You cannot be a Christian, knowing full well the act or even implication of
sodomy is an evil, and take part in it on ANY level.

A Christian would know from scriptural teachings that sodomy is considered a
great evil by God.

The Hebrew word `qadesh' in Hebrew texts is the word meaning males who engage
in sexual relationships with other men or animals.


To a Christian, the act of sodomy is a great evil, forbidden by God. And, to a
Christian, even the appearance of evil is abhorant, and to be avoided at all
costs.


EC>So it had nothing to do with any legal or
EC>religious implications of a "marriage." He just did not like the idea that
EC>two gay men were together in any way by any name.


You bring in a fact not in any of the evidence. You cannot possibly know what
he `just did not like'.


It isn't a matter of `what he likes'.


The bottom line is; he is a practicing Christian. And by Christian scriptures,
he is forbidden to do evil, or participate in evil on any level. Or even allow
the appearance of evil into his life or any aspect of his life; business,
family, or private and personal.


And THAT is what is being attacked, here. His Christianity.


If the sodomites can take this guy down, its just one more step down the road
to destroying all moral and principled life in this country.


I see it as either Religious Freedom is real or it isn't. If these two
sodomites win against this baker, Religious Freedom becomes a things of the
past. One more tear in the Constitution.





---
*Durango b301 #PE* 
 * Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 Join Us: www.DocsPlace.org (1:123/140)