Tillbaka till svenska Fidonet
English   Information   Debug  
FNEWS_PUBLISH   4393
FN_SYSOP   41678
FN_SYSOP_OLD1   71952
FTP_FIDO   0/2
FTSC_PUBLIC   0/13598
FUNNY   0/4886
GENEALOGY.EUR   0/71
GET_INFO   105
GOLDED   0/408
HAM   0/16069
HOLYSMOKE   6196/6791
HOT_SITES   0/1
HTMLEDIT   0/71
HUB203   466
HUB_100   264
HUB_400   39
HUMOR   0/29
IC   0/2851
INTERNET   0/424
INTERUSER   0/3
IP_CONNECT   719
JAMNNTPD   0/233
JAMTLAND   0/47
KATTY_KORNER   0/41
LAN   0/16
LINUX-USER   0/19
LINUXHELP   0/1155
LINUX   0/22090
LINUX_BBS   0/957
mail   18.68
mail_fore_ok   249
MENSA   0/341
MODERATOR   0/102
MONTE   0/992
MOSCOW_OKLAHOMA   0/1245
MUFFIN   0/783
MUSIC   0/321
N203_STAT   924
N203_SYSCHAT   313
NET203   321
NET204   69
NET_DEV   0/10
NORD.ADMIN   0/101
NORD.CHAT   0/2572
NORD.FIDONET   189
NORD.HARDWARE   0/28
NORD.KULTUR   0/114
NORD.PROG   0/32
NORD.SOFTWARE   0/88
NORD.TEKNIK   0/58
NORD   0/453
OCCULT_CHAT   0/93
OS2BBS   0/787
OS2DOSBBS   0/580
OS2HW   0/42
OS2INET   0/37
OS2LAN   0/134
OS2PROG   0/36
OS2REXX   0/113
OS2USER-L   207
OS2   0/4786
OSDEBATE   0/18996
PASCAL   0/490
PERL   0/457
PHP   0/45
POINTS   0/405
POLITICS   0/29554
POL_INC   0/14731
PSION   103
R20_ADMIN   1121
R20_AMATORRADIO   0/2
R20_BEST_OF_FIDONET   13
R20_CHAT   0/893
R20_DEPP   0/3
R20_DEV   399
R20_ECHO2   1379
R20_ECHOPRES   0/35
R20_ESTAT   0/719
R20_FIDONETPROG...
...RAM.MYPOINT
  0/2
R20_FIDONETPROGRAM   0/22
R20_FIDONET   0/248
R20_FILEFIND   0/24
R20_FILEFOUND   0/22
R20_HIFI   0/3
R20_INFO2   3206
R20_INTERNET   0/12940
R20_INTRESSE   0/60
R20_INTR_KOM   0/99
R20_KANDIDAT.CHAT   42
R20_KANDIDAT   28
R20_KOM_DEV   112
R20_KONTROLL   0/13259
R20_KORSET   0/18
R20_LOKALTRAFIK   0/24
R20_MODERATOR   0/1852
R20_NC   76
R20_NET200   245
R20_NETWORK.OTH...
...ERNETS
  0/13
R20_OPERATIVSYS...
...TEM.LINUX
  0/44
R20_PROGRAMVAROR   0/1
R20_REC2NEC   534
R20_SFOSM   0/340
R20_SF   0/108
R20_SPRAK.ENGLISH   0/1
R20_SQUISH   107
R20_TEST   2
R20_WORST_OF_FIDONET   12
RAR   0/9
RA_MULTI   106
RA_UTIL   0/162
REGCON.EUR   0/2056
REGCON   0/13
SCIENCE   0/1206
SF   0/239
SHAREWARE_SUPPORT   0/5146
SHAREWRE   0/14
SIMPSONS   0/169
STATS_OLD1   0/2539.065
STATS_OLD2   0/2530
STATS_OLD3   630/2395.095
STATS_OLD4   0/1692.25
SURVIVOR   0/495
SYSOPS_CORNER   0/3
SYSOP   0/84
TAGLINES   0/112
TEAMOS2   0/4530
TECH   0/2617
TEST.444   0/105
TRAPDOOR   0/19
TREK   0/755
TUB   0/290
UFO   0/40
UNIX   0/1316
USA_EURLINK   0/102
USR_MODEMS   0/1
VATICAN   0/2740
VIETNAM_VETS   0/14
VIRUS   0/378
VIRUS_INFO   0/201
VISUAL_BASIC   0/473
WHITEHOUSE   0/5187
WIN2000   0/101
WIN32   0/30
WIN95   0/4288
WIN95_OLD1   0/70272
WINDOWS   0/1517
WWB_SYSOP   0/419
WWB_TECH   0/810
ZCC-PUBLIC   0/1
ZEC   4

 
4DOS   0/134
ABORTION   0/7
ALASKA_CHAT   0/506
ALLFIX_FILE   0/1313
ALLFIX_FILE_OLD1   0/7997
ALT_DOS   0/152
AMATEUR_RADIO   0/1039
AMIGASALE   0/14
AMIGA   0/331
AMIGA_INT   0/1
AMIGA_PROG   0/20
AMIGA_SYSOP   0/26
ANIME   0/15
ARGUS   0/924
ASCII_ART   0/340
ASIAN_LINK   0/651
ASTRONOMY   0/417
AUDIO   0/92
AUTOMOBILE_RACING   0/105
BABYLON5   0/17862
BAG   135
BATPOWER   0/361
BBBS.ENGLISH   0/382
BBSLAW   0/109
BBS_ADS   0/5290
BBS_INTERNET   0/507
BIBLE   0/3563
BINKD   0/1119
BINKLEY   0/215
BLUEWAVE   0/2173
CABLE_MODEMS   0/25
CBM   0/46
CDRECORD   0/66
CDROM   0/20
CLASSIC_COMPUTER   0/378
COMICS   0/15
CONSPRCY   0/899
COOKING   32689
COOKING_OLD1   0/24719
COOKING_OLD2   0/40862
COOKING_OLD3   0/37489
COOKING_OLD4   0/35496
COOKING_OLD5   9370
C_ECHO   0/189
C_PLUSPLUS   0/31
DIRTY_DOZEN   0/201
DOORGAMES   0/2053
DOS_INTERNET   0/196
duplikat   6002
ECHOLIST   0/18295
EC_SUPPORT   0/318
ELECTRONICS   0/359
ELEKTRONIK.GER   1534
ENET.LINGUISTIC   0/13
ENET.POLITICS   0/4
ENET.SOFT   0/11701
ENET.SYSOP   33888
ENET.TALKS   0/32
ENGLISH_TUTOR   0/2000
EVOLUTION   0/1335
FDECHO   0/217
FDN_ANNOUNCE   0/7068
FIDONEWS   24099
FIDONEWS_OLD1   0/49742
FIDONEWS_OLD2   0/35949
FIDONEWS_OLD3   0/30874
FIDONEWS_OLD4   0/37224
FIDO_SYSOP   12852
FIDO_UTIL   0/180
FILEFIND   0/209
FILEGATE   0/212
FILM   0/18
Möte HOLYSMOKE, 6791 texter
 lista första sista föregående nästa
Text 6785, 143 rader
Skriven 2014-03-13 09:54:00 av TIM RICHARDSON (1:123/140)
     Kommentar till en text av EARL CROASMUN
Ärende: Arizona discrimination
==============================
On 03-12-14, EARL CROASMUN said to TIM RICHARDSON:


>> Your objection to same-sex marriage is based on your objection to certain
>> sexual practices. You even refer to those who are emotionally attracted to
>> people of the same sex as "sodomites" even though a given person may have
>> NEVER had sex of ANY kind. I am sorry you cannot see this.


> You brought this up as a (very poor) strawman to cover your confusion over
> what's actually going on in this case.


EC>You insist on using your objections to a sex act as an objection to
EC>marriage. THAT is a classic example of a "strawman" argument.


You are trying to make *ME* the subject of this discussion, in order to cover
your objection to the baker having his right to refuse to participate in a
same-sex sodomite `marriage' because `sodomy' violates the baker's strongly-
held religious principles.


It has nothing whatever to do with *what* I do or do not object to.


EC>I pointed out that the two were very different things, which is not even
EC>close to being a "strawman" argument.


This is a same-sex sodomite `marriage'.  The "strawman" argument you recently
presented was all over the board.

> This is a case of two same-sex sodomites getting `married' in Massechusetts
> (where sodomite marriage is legal), wanting to `celebrate' that in
> Colorado, and wanting to make a Christian baker participate by baking
> them a cake that does so.


EC>It has nothing to do with sodomy, and it has nothing to do with
EC>"participating."


And a male and female couple getting `married' has nothing to do with sex
relations, and the preacher `marrying' them is not a participant in that
union, either.


The preacher, the reception caterer, the flower shop, the tuxedo and wedding
dress renters, the baker who bakes the wedding cake....


ALL are participants in what is KNOWN to be occuring: a formal cerimony to
celibrate a joining of two people who the whole world KNOWS are in all
likelyhood going to engage in sexual relations!


Its even sometimes refered to as a sort of `industry'!

> So far in this case, I don't see anyone claiming this whole thing is `for
> immigration purposes' or any claim that they (either one or both) were
> merely `emotionally attracted to each other only and no sex was
> involved', or merely so `one could take care of the other', or `spousal
> benefits'...or any of the other strawmen you've tossed up to try to win
> your case.


EC>I made no claims as to why they got married.


Nor did I. It is implicit in the very act of `marriage'. Its older than the
modern age we live in.


EC>I pointed out
EC>that you WERE making assumptions, and that your assumptions are only
EC>assumptions that have no basis in fact.  I was not tossing up strawmen, I
EC>was knocking them down.  The term has an actual meaning.



> By the way...sex between two people of the same sex is `sodomy'. It has
>been defined as such since the days of Abraham and Lot, when the two
>cities Sodom and Gommorah were destroyed over the practice of
>homosexuality (among other things).


EC>Historically incorrect.  The Supreme Court's majority opinion in Lawrence
EC>v Texas goes into the history of sodomy laws.


EC>http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Lawrence_v._Texas/Opinion_of_the_Court


Historically correct. To a devout, practicing Christian, the Bible supercedes
any court of the United States.


EC>The term covers different-sex as well as same-sex, as well as a wide
EC>variety of specific sex acts.  The application you are making has only
EC>been common in the last few decades.  More generally, through history, the
EC>term has been used for ANY sex act that is not for the purpose of
EC>procreation.  If you really want to use the term "sodomite" to apply to
EC>anyone who has given or received oral sex with anyone of either sex,
EC>anyone who has engaged in sex where either participant had a vasectomy or
EC>tubal ligation, or where a condom or any other contraceptive was involved,
EC>well, that would be more historically accurate, but it would not support
EC>your argument very well.


You are all over the board, here. We both know perfectly well what we are
discussing, without all that stuff you've thrown in to cover your weak
argument.


The bottom line is, was, and will remain:


Two same-sex sodomites went to a Christian baker to order a cake to celibrate
a same-sex sodomite `marriage'.


Such a `marriage' is strictly against the deeply-held religious principles of
the baker, and they refused, on religious grounds, to be a participant in any
way to sodomy.


There is either the right to practice one's religion in this nation, or their
isn't.


If these two same-sex sodomites succeed in prevailing over this Christian
baker, then the First Amendment of the Constitution is no longer valid.


Incidently, if this part of the First Amendment gets shredded, the entire
Amendment becomes meaningless, and `Freedom of the Press' is no longer valid,
either. Very scary.


---
*Durango b301 #PE* 
 * Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 Join Us: www.DocsPlace.org (1:123/140)