Text 1317, 59 rader
Skriven 2006-05-20 01:37:44 av Janis Kracht (1:261/38)
   Kommentar till text 1316 av Philip Lozier (1:267/169)
Ärende: Immediate Action Require
================================
Hi Phil,

>>>> Yes,
>>>> 1:202/22 works for me...

>>> Hmmmm... In today's FidoNet the guy could probably set up the number and go
>>> right to an echomail source and =possibly= get a feed, depending on who he
>>> contacts.  Scary thought.

>> I don't know about your software, but mine would balk at a node not
>> in the nodelist.. even if it was an internet node.

> ECHOMAIL?  Note above I said echomail source. Maybe for netmail, but not
> echomail being distributed?  :>

Yes, BBBS would balk at a node who was not in the nodelist if I tried to send
it any type of mail.

>I wasn't saying *I* would offer echomail to an unlisted node... was just being

I know that :)

>"funny" thinking about a few months back when somebody got reuinted with their
> old net after recieveing, and sending (seen by everybody) echomail on his old
> node number.  Your system will NOT balk at echomail that is being distributed
> with the rest of it... what mailer or tosser checks "echomail" origin lines
> against the nodelist.

If that fellow was a downlink of mine, BBBS would balk.  It takes in ANYBODY's
echomail though <grin>...


> What stops it so long as the echo uplink has them configured in?

Dunno.. BBBS does check the node for a node number I guess.. and a dialable
point (I mean like a phone number,etc.).

> Maybe you misunderstood the point, even though there really was no point....
>just an observation from what has already happened, and to the reality of what
> FidoNet is today to itself when it all boils down to it.  Or maybe is it that
> you -thought- I meant something else, and were looking for an opportunity to
> belittle me because I blame the degression of FidoNet in Z1 on those who have
> ignored the -real- issues here and made the biggest things out of the most
> unimportant crap as if we still had 30,000 nodes (and part of that loss a
> result of it) to worry about... and I make no secrets about it?

Geez, Phil, gimme a break.  All I was saying is exactly what I said.. quit
reading crap into stuff. :)


> Name the issues with the above software that you "don't know about".

Nevermind :) Not worth the trouble to explain <grin>

Take care,
Janis

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag-5
 * Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)